When and How to Regulate: Everyday Emotion-Regulation Strategy Use and Stressor Intensity

Affective Science - 2022
Elisabeth S. Blanke1, Jennifer A. Bellingtier2, Michaela Riediger2, Annette Brose1
1Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, 10099, Berlin, Germany
2Department of Developmental Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany

Tóm tắt

AbstractContextual factors shape emotion regulation (ER). The intensity of emotional stimuli may be such a contextual factor that influences the selection and moderates the effectiveness of ER strategies in reducing negative affect (NA). Prior research has shown that, on average, when emotional stimuli were more intense, distraction was selected over reappraisal (and vice versa). This pattern was previously shown to be adaptive as the preferred strategies were more efficient in the respective contexts. Here, we investigated whether stressor intensity predicted strategy use and effectiveness in similar ways in daily life. We examined five ER strategies (reappraisal, reflection, acceptance, distraction, and rumination) in relation to the intensity of everyday stressors, using two waves of experience-sampling data (N = 156). In accordance with our hypotheses, reappraisal, reflection, and acceptance were used less, and rumination was used more, when stressors were more intense. Moreover, results suggested that distraction was more effective, and rumination more detrimental the higher the stressor intensity. Against our hypotheses, distraction did not covary with stressor intensity, and there was no evidence that reappraisal, reflection, and acceptance were more effective at lower levels of stressor intensity. Instead, when examined individually, reflection and reappraisal (like distraction) were more effective at higher levels of stressor intensity. In sum, stressor intensity predicted ER selection and moderated strategy effectiveness, but the results also point to a more complex ER strategy use in daily life than in the laboratory.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aldao, A., Sheppes, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9662-4

Beckwé, M., Deroost, N., Koster, E. H. W., De Lissnyder, E., & De Raedt, R. (2014). Worrying and rumination are both associated with reduced cognitive control. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 78(5), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0517-5

Blanke, E. S., Brose, A., Kalokerinos, E. K., Erbas, Y., Riediger, M., & Kuppens, P. (2020). Mix it to fix it: Emotion regulation variability in daily life. Emotion, 20(3), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000566

Blanke, E. S., Kalokerinos, E. K., Riediger, M., & Brose, A. (2020). The shape of emotion regulation: Trait emotion regulation as density distributions of states. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(3), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000586.

Blanke, E. S., Schmidt, M. J., Riediger, M., & Brose, A. (2020). Thinking mindfully: How mindfulness relates to rumination and reflection in daily life. Emotion, 20(8), 1369–1381. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000659

Blanke, E. S., Neubauer, A. B., Houben, M., Erbas, Y., & Brose, A. (2021). Why do my thoughts feel so bad? Getting at the reciprocal effects of rumination and negative affect using dynamic structural equation modeling. Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000946

Bonanno, G. A., & Burton, C. L. (2013). Regulatory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504116

Brans, K., Koval, P., Verduyn, P., Lim, Y. L., & Kuppens, P. (2013). The regulation of negative and positive affect in daily life. Emotion, 13(5), 926–939. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032400

Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., Gerstorf, D., & Voelkle, M. C. (2020). The measurement of within-person affect variation. Emotion, 20(4), 677–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000583

Ford, B. Q., Gross, J. J., & Gruber, J. (2019). Broadening our field of view: The role of emotion polyregulation. Emotion Review, 11(3), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919850314

Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138

Genet, J. J., & Siemer, M. (2012). Rumination moderates the effects of daily events on negative mood: Results from a diary study. Emotion, 12(6), 1329–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028070

Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271

Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781

Haines, S. J., Gleeson, J., Kuppens, P., Hollenstein, T., Ciarrochi, J., Labuschagne, I., Grace, C., & Koval, P. (2016). The wisdom to know the difference: Strategy-situation fit in emotion regulation in daily life is associated with well-being. Psychological Science, 27(12), 1651–1659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616669086

Lennarz, H. K., Hollenstein, T., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Kuntsche, E., & Granic, I. (2019). Emotion regulation in action: Use, selection, and success of emotion regulation in adolescents’ daily lives. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025418755540

Mehta, A., Formanowicz, M., Uusberg, A., Uusberg, H., Gross, J. J., & Suri, G. (2020). The regulation of recurrent negative emotion in the aftermath of a lost election. Cognition and Emotion, 34(4), 848–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1682970

Mehta, A., Young, G., Wicker, A., Barber, S., & Suri, G. (2017). Emotion regulation choice: Differences in US and Indian populations. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(2), 202–219. last retrieved on Nov 5th 2021. https://ijip.in/pdf-viewer/?id=12404

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x

Ortner, C. N. M., & Pennekamp, P. (2020). Emotion malleability beliefs and event intensity and importance predict emotion regulation in daily life. Personality and Individual Differences, 159,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109887

Raes, F., Hermans, D., Williams, J. M. G., Bijttebier, P., & Eelen, P. (2008). A “triple W”-model of rumination on sadness: Why am I feeling sad, what’s the meaning of my sadness, and wish I could stop thinking about my sadness (but I can’t!). Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(4), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-007-9137-y

Richter, D., & Schupp, J. (2015). The SOEP Innovation Sample (SOEP IS). Schmollers Jahrbuch, 135(3), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.135.3.389

Riediger, M., Schmiedek, F., Wagner, G. G., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). Seeking pleasure and seeking pain: Differences in prohedonic and contra-hedonic motivation from adolescence to old age. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02473.x

Schmiedek, F., & Neubauer, A. B. (2020). Experiments in the wild: Introducing the within-person encouragement design. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(2), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1627660

Sheppes, G. (2020). Transcending the “good & bad” and “here & now” in emotion regulation: Costs and benefits of strategies across regulatory stages. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 61, pp. 185–236). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.09.003

Sheppes, G., & Meiran, N. (2007). Better late than never? On the dynamics of online regulation of sadness using distraction and cognitive reappraisal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(11), 1518–1532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207305537

Sheppes, G., & Meiran, N. (2008). Divergent cognitive costs for online forms of reappraisal and distraction. Emotion, 8(6), 870–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013711

Sheppes, G., Scheibe, S., Suri, G., Radu, P., Blechert, J., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Emotion regulation choice: A conceptual framework and supporting evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030831

Siebert, S., Blanke, E. S., & Brose, A. (2017). Everyday experiences in the SOEP Innovation Sample (EE-SOEP-IS): A multi-method study. In J. Britzke & J. Schupp (Ed.), SOEP Wave Report 2016 (pp. 69–72). DIW Berlin. Retrieved on Nov 5th 2021. https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.560446.de/wave_report_2016.pdf

Troy, A. S., Saquib, S., Thal, J., & Ciuk, D. J. (2019). The regulation of negative and positive affect in response to daily stressors. Emotion, 19(5), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000486

Troy, A. S., Shallcross, A. J., Brunner, A., Friedman, R., & Jones, M. C. (2018). Cognitive reappraisal and acceptance: Effects on emotion, physiology, and perceived cognitive costs. Emotion, 18(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000371

Vanderhasselt, M. A., Brose, A., Koster, E. H. W., & De Raedt, R. (2016). Co-variation between stressful events and rumination predicts depressive symptoms: An eighteen months prospective design in undergraduates. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 87, 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.09.003

Veilleux, J. C., Hyde, K. C., Chamberlain, K. D., Higuera, D. E., Schreiber, R. E., Warner, E. A., & Clift, J. B. (2021). The “thinking threshold”: A therapeutic concept guided by emotion regulation flexibility. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ke9uf

Wang, M., Liu, S., Liao, H., Gong, Y., Kammeyer-Mueller, J., & Shi, J. (2013). Can’t get it out of my mind: Employee rumination after customer mistreatment and negative mood in the next morning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 989–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033656

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6). https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063

Webb, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 775–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027600

Wenzel, M., Blanke, E. S., Rowland, Z., & Brose, A. (2021). The costs and benefits of mindfulness and reappraisal in daily life. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ca7hg

Wenzel, M., Blanke, E. S., Rowland, Z., & Kubiak, T. (2021). Emotion regulation dynamics in daily life: Adaptive strategy use may be variable without being unstable and predictable without being autoregressive. Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000967

Wenzel, M., Rowland, Z., Weber, H., & Kubiak, T. (2020). A round peg in a square hole: Strategy-situation fit of intra- and interpersonal emotion regulation strategies and controllability. Cognition and Emotion, 34(5), 1003–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1697209

Wilms, R., Lanwehr, R., & Kastenmüller, A. (2020). Emotion regulation in everyday life: The role of goals and situational factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 877. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00877

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Affective Science

Thông tin tác giả