What is the value added by caseworkers?

Labour Economics - Tập 14 Số 2 - Trang 135-151 - 2007
Michael Lechner1,2,3,4, Jeffrey A. Smith2,5,6
1CEPR, London, United Kingdom
2IZA, Bonn, Germany
3University of St. Gallen, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economic Research (SIAW), Switzerland
4ZEW Mannheim, Germany
5NBER, United States
6University of Michigan, United States

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abbring, 2004, Analyzing the effect of dynamically assigned treatments using duration models, binary treatment models and panel data models, Empirical Economics, 29, 5, 10.1007/s00181-003-0188-y

Atag, Ernst, Young Consulting, 1999. RAV-Evaluation: Schlussbericht (Atag, Ernst and Young Consulting, Bern).

Bell, 2002, Screening (and creaming?) applicants to job training programs: The AFDC Homemaker Home Health Aide demonstrations, Labour Economics, 9, 279, 10.1016/S0927-5371(02)00006-4

Benitez-Silva, H., Buchinsky, M., Rust, J., 2004. How large are the classification errors in the social security disability award process? NBER Working Paper No. 10219.

Bera, 1984, Testing the normality assumption in limited dependent variable models, International Economic Review, 25, 563, 10.2307/2526219

Berger, 2000, Evaluating profiling as a means of allocating government services, 59

Black, 2003, Is the threat of reemployment services more effective than the services themselves? Evidence from random assignment in the UI system, American Economic Review, 93, 1313, 10.1257/000282803769206313

Caliendo, M., Hujer, R., Thomsen, S., 2004, Effect heterogeneity, profiling and targeting: How can we improve the efficiency of labour market policies? Unpublished manuscript, J.W. Göthe Universität.

Colpitts, 2002, Targeting reemployment services in Canada, 283

Davidson, 1984, Convenient specification tests for logit and probit models, Journal of Econometrics, 25, 241, 10.1016/0304-4076(84)90001-0

Dehejia, 2005, Program evaluation as a decision problem, Journal of Econometrics, 125, 141, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.006

2002

Eberts, 2002, A Frontline Decision Support System for one-stop centers, 337

Fredricksson, P., Johansson, P., 2003. Program evaluation and random program starts, Uppsala University Department of Economics Working Paper No. 2003:1.

Frölich, 2003, vol. 524

Gerfin, 2002, Microeconometric evaluation of active labour market policy in Switzerland, Economic Journal, 112, 854, 10.1111/1468-0297.00072

Heckman, 1999, The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs, vol. 3A, 1865

Horace, 2000, Multiple comparisons with the best, with economic applications, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 1, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(200001/02)15:1<1::AID-JAE551>3.0.CO;2-Y

Imbens, 2000, The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions, Biometrika, 87, 706, 10.1093/biomet/87.3.706

Lechner, 1999, Earnings and employment effects of continuous off-the-job training in East Germany after unification, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 17, 74, 10.2307/1392240

Lechner, 2001, Identification and estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments under the conditional independence assumption, 43

Lechner, M., Smith, J., 2003. What is the value added by caseworkers?” IZA Working Paper No. 728.

Manski, 2004, Statistical treatment rules for heterogeneous populations, Econometrica, 75, 1221, 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00530.x

O'Leary, 2002, Targeting reemployment bonuses, 161

Orme, 1988, The calculation of the information matrix test for binary data models, The Manchester School, 56, 370, 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1988.tb01339.x

Rubin, 1980, Discussion of paper by D. Basu, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 591, 10.2307/2287653

Sianesi, 2004, An evaluation of the active labour market programmes in Sweden, Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 133, 10.1162/003465304323023723

White, 1982, Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models, Econometrica, 50, 1, 10.2307/1912526