What is the Strength of the Link Between Objective and Subjective Indicators of Urban Quality of Life?

Applied Research in Quality of Life - Tập 1 Số 1 - Trang 79-96 - 2006
Rod McCrea1, Tung‐Kai Shyy2, Robert J. Stimson1
1Centre for Research into Sustainable Urban and Regional Futures (CR-SURF), School of Geography, Planning and Architecture, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
2Centre for Research into Sustainable Urban and Regional Futures (CR-SURF), School of Geography, Planning and Architecture, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrews F, Withey SB (1976) Social indicators of well-being: Americans perceptions of quality of life. Plenum, New York

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001a) Australian standard geographic classification. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001b) Census of population and housing: basic community profiles. Retrieved September 2004.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001c) 2001 Census dictionary. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

Beattie P, Mackenroth T, Newman C (2004) Draft South East Queensland Regional Plan: for consultation. Queensland Government, Office of Urban Management, Department of Local Government, Planning, Sport and Recreation, Brisbane

Blomquist GC, Berger MC, Hoehn JP (1988) New estimates of quality of life in urban areas. Am Econ Rev 78(1):89–107

Bowling A, Windsor J (2001) Towards the good life: a population survey of dimensions of quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies 2:55–81

Boyer R, Savageau D (1981) Places rated almanac. Rand McNally, Chicago, Illinois

Campbell A, Converse P, Rodgers W (1976) The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. Sage, New York

Cicerchia A (1999) Measures of optimal centrality: indicators of city effect and urban overloading. Soc Indic Res 46:276–299

Cummins RA (2000) Objective and subjective quality of life: an interactive model. Soc Indic Res 52(1):55–72

DeNeve KM (1999) Happy as an extraverted clam? The role of personality for subjective well-being. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 8(5):141–144

Diener E (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 95(3):542–575

Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL (1999) Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 125(2):276–302

Evans S, Huxley P (2002) Studies of quality of life in the general population. Int Rev Psychiatry 14(3):203–211

Goodchild MF (2000) New horizons for the social sciences: Geographic information systems. In: Social Sciences for a Digital World: building Infrastructure and Databases for the Future (Vol. 2004). Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, pp. 163–172

Goodchild MF, Anselin L, Appelbaum RP, Harthorn BH (2000) Toward spatially integrated social science. Int Reg Sci Rev 23(2):139–159

Hayes N, Joseph S (2003) Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective well-being. Pers Individ Differ 34(4):723–727

Headey B, Wearing A (1989) Personality, life events, and subjective well-being-toward a dynamic equilibrium-model. J Pers Soc Psychol 57(4):731–739

Headey B, Holmstrom E, Wearing A (1984) The impact of life events and changes in domain satisfactions on well-being. Soc Indic Res 15(3):203–227

Headey B, Veenhoven R, Wearing A (1991) Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Soc Indic Res 24(1):81–100

Kahneman D (1999) Objective happiness. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Sage, New York

Lance CE, Lautenschlager GJ, Sloan CE, Varca PE (1989) A comparison between bottom-up, top-down, and bidirectional models of relationships between global and life facet satisfaction. J Person 57(3):601–624

Marans RW, Rodgers W (1975) Toward an understanding of community satisfaction. In: Hawley A, Rock, V (eds) Metropolitan America in contemporary perspective. Halsted, New York

McCrea R, Stimson R, Western J (2005) Testing a moderated model of satisfaction with urban living using data for Brisbane-South East Queensland, Australia. Soc Indic Res 72(2):121–152

Michalos AC, Zumbo BD (1999) Public services and the quality of life. Soc Indic Res 48(2):125–156

Rogerson R, Findlay AM, Morris AS, Coombes MG (1989) Indicators of quality of life – some methodological issues. Environ Plann A 21(12):1655–1666

Schwarz N, Strack F (1999) Reports of subjective well-being: judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In: Kahneman D, Diener E (eds) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Sage, New York, New York, pp. 61–84

Schwarz N, Strack F, Kommer D, Wagner D (1987) Soccer, rooms, and the quality of your life – mood effects on judgments of satisfaction with life in general and with specific domains. Eur J Soc Psychol 17(1):69–79

Schwirian KP, Nelson AL, Schwirian PM (1995) Modeling urbanism – economic, social and environmental-stress in cities. Soc Indic Res 35(2):201–223

Sirgy MJ, Cornwell T (2001) Further validation of the Sirgy et al.'s measure of community quality of life. Soc Indic Res 56(2):125–143

Sirgy MJ, Cornwell T (2002) How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Soc Indic Res 59(1):79–114

Sirgy MJ, Rahtz DR, Cicic M, Underwood R (2000) A method for assessing residents' satisfaction with community-based services: a quality-of-life perspective. Soc Indic Res 49(3):279–316

Stover ME, Leven CL (1992) Methodological issues in the determination of the quality-of-life in urban areas. Urban Studies 29(5):737–754

Turksever ANE, Atalik G (2001) Possibilities and limitations for the measurement of the quality of life in urban areas. Soc Indic Res 53(2):163–187

Vitterso J, Nilsen F (2002) The conceptual and relational structure of subjective well-being, neuroticism, and extraversion: once again, neuroticism is the important predictor of happiness. Soc Indic Res 57(1):89–118