What drives conditional cooperation in public good games?
Tóm tắt
Extensive experimental research on public good games documents that many subjects are “conditional cooperators” in that they positively correlate their contribution with (their belief about) contributions of other subjects in their peer group. The goal of our study is to shed light on what preference and decision-making patterns drive this observed regularity. We consider reciprocity, conformity, inequality aversion and residual factors, such as confusion and anchoring, as potential explanations. Effects of these drivers are separated by varying how others’ contributions are determined and the informational content of the conditioning variable across treatments. Assuming additive separability of the effects of the four drivers, we find that, of the average conditionally cooperative behavior, at least 40 percent is driven by residual factors. For the remainder, most is accounted for by inequality aversion, some by conformity and very little by reciprocity. These findings carry an important message for how to interpret conditional cooperation observed in the lab. We also discuss what these findings mean for understanding conditional cooperation in fundraising applications in the field.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Al-Ubaydli, Omar, & Lee, Min Sok. (2012). Do you reward and punish in the way you think others expect you to? Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(3), 336–343.
Alpizar, Francisco, Carlsson, Fredrik, & Johansson-Stenman, Olof. (2008). Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5), 1047–1060.
Andreoni, James. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy,, 1447–1458.
Andreoni, James. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.
Andreoni, James. (1995). Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion? American Economic Review, 85(4), 891–904.
Andreoni, James. (2006). Leadership giving in charitable fund-raising. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8(1), 1–22.
Ashley, Richard, Ball, Sheryl, & Eckel, Catherine. (2010). Motives for giving: A reanalysis of two classic public goods experiments. Southern Economic Journal, 77(1), 15–26.
Axelrod, Robert. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1095–1111.
Bardsley, Nicholas, & Sausgruber, Rupert. (2005). Conformity and reciprocity in public good provision. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(5), 664–681.
Battigalli, Pierpaolo, & Dufwenberg, Martin. (2007). Guilt in Games. American Economic Review, 97(2), 170–176.
Becker, G. S. (1974). A Theory of Social Interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1063–1093.
Bernheim, B Douglas. (1994). A theory of conformity. Journal of Political Economy, 102(5), 841–877.
Bikhchandani, Sushil, Hirshleifer, David, & Welch, Ivo. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151–170.
Bolton, Gary E., & Ockenfels, Axel. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193.
Burton-Chellew, Maxwell N., El Mouden, Claire, & West, Stuart A. (2016). Conditional cooperation and confusion in public-goods experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(5), 1291–1296.
Cappelletti, Dominique, Güth, Werner, & Ploner, Matteo. (2011). Unravelling conditional cooperation. Jena Economic Research Papers,, (2011–047).
Charness, Gary, & Dufwenberg, Martin. (2006). Promises and Partnership. Econometrica, 74(6), 1579–1601.
Charness, Gary, & Cheung, Tsz. (2013). A restaurant field experiment in charitable contributions. Economics Letters, 119(1), 48–49.
Charness, Gary, Samek, Anya, & van de Ven, Jeroen. (2020). What is Considered Deception in Experimental Economics?, 2020. Version from June 29.
Chaudhuri, Ananish. (2011). Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature. Experimental Economics, 14(1), 47–83.
Chou, Eileen, McConnell, Margaret, Nagel, Rosemarie, & Plott, Charles R. (2009). The control of game form recognition in experiments: understanding dominant strategy failures in a simple two person “guessing’’ game. Experimental Economics, 12(2), 159–179.
Cooper, David J. (2014). A note on deception in economic experiments. Journal of Wine Economics, 9(2), 111–114.
Croson, Rachel, & Shang, Jen (Yue). (2008). The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions. Experimental Economics, 11, 221–233.
Croson, Rachel, Handy, Femida, & Shang, Jen. (2009). Keeping up with the Joneses: The relationship of perceived descriptive social norms, social information, and charitable giving. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 19(4), 467–489.
Dawes, Christopher T., Fowler, James H., Johnson, Tim, McElreath, Richard, & Smirnov, Oleg. (2007). Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature, 446(7137), 794.
Dufwenberg, Martin, & Kirchsteiger, Georg. (2004). A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 47(2), 268–298.
Edwards, James T., & List, John A. (2014). Toward an understanding of why suggestions work in charitable fundraising: Theory and evidence from a natural field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 114, 1–13.
Ellingsen, Tore, Johannesson, Magnus, Tjøtta, Sigve, & Torsvik, Gaute. (2010). Testing guilt aversion. Games and Economic Behavior, 68(1), 95–107.
Engler, Yola, Kerschbamer, Rudolf, & Page, Lionel. (2018). Guilt averse or reciprocal? Looking at behavioral motivations in the trust game. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 4(1), 1–14.
Falk, Armin. (2007). Gift exchange in the field. Econometrica, 75(5), 1501–1511.
Falk, Armin, & Fischbacher, Urs. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293–315.
Falk, Armin, Fehr, Ernst, & Fischbacher, Urs. (2005). Driving forces behind informal sanctions. Econometrica, 73(6), 2017–2030.
Fehr, Ernst, & Schmidt, Klaus M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868.
Fehr, Ernst, & Fischbacher, Urs. (2004). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 185–190.
Ferraro, Paul J., & Vossler, Christian A. (2010). The Source and Significance of Confusion in Public Goods Experiments. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 10 (1).
Fischbacher, Urs. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.
Fischbacher, Urs, Gächter, Simon, & Fehr, Ernst. (2001). Are People Conditionally Cooperative ? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment. Economics Letters, 71(3), 397–404.
Frey, Bruno S., & Meier, Stephan. (2004). Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing “Conditional Cooperation’’ in a Field Experiment. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1717–1722.
Gächter, Simon. (2007). Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications. In Bruno S. Frey & Alois Stutzer (Eds.), Economics and Psychology. A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field (pp. 19–50). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Goeschl, Timo, & Lohse, Johannes. (2018). Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused? European Economic Review, 107, 185–203.
Goeschl, Timo, Kettner, Sara Elisa, Lohse, Johannes, & Schwieren, Christiane. (2018). From Social Information to Social Norms: Evidence from Two Experiments on Donation Behaviour. Games, 9 (4).
Greiner, Ben. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 114–125.
Gul, Faruk, & Pesendorfer, Wolfgang. (2016). Interdependent preference models as a theory of intentions. Journal of Economic Theory, 165, 179–208.
Gunnthorsdottir, Anna, Houser, Daniel, & McCabe, Kevin. (2007). Disposition, history and contributions in public goods experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62(2), 304–315.
Herne, Kaisa, Lappalainen, Olli, & Kestilä-Kekkonen, Elina. (2013). Experimental comparison of direct, general, and indirect reciprocity. Journal of Socio-Economics, 45, 38–46.
Hertwig, Ralph, & Ortmann, Andreas. (2008). Deception in experiments: Revisiting the arguments in its defense. Ethics & behavior, 18(1), 59–92.
Houser, Daniel, & Kurzban, Robert. (2002). Revisiting Kindness and Confusion in Public Goods Experiments. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1062–1069.
Janssen, Dirk-Jan., Füllbrunn, Sascha, & Weitzel, Utz. (2019). Individual speculative behavior and overpricing in experimental asset markets. Experimental Economics, 22(3), 653–675.
Johnson, Tim, Dawes, Christopher T., Fowler, James H., McElreath, Richard, & Smirnov, Oleg. (2009). The role of egalitarian motives in altruistic punishment. Economics Letters, 102(3), 192–194.
Keser, Claudia. (1996). Voluntary contributions to a public good when partial contribution is a dominant strategy. Economics Letters, 50(3), 359–366.
Krawczyk, Michał. (2019). What should be regarded as deception in experimental economics? Evidence from a survey of researchers and subjects. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 79, 110–118.
Laffont, Jean-Jacques. (1975). Macroeconomic constraints, economic efficiency and ethics: An introduction to Kantian economics. Economica, 42(168), 430–437.
Ledyard, John. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In John Kagel & Alvin Roth (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics. USA: Princeton University Press.
Levine, David K. (1998). Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1(3), 593–622.
List, John A., & Lucking-Reiley, David. (2002). The Effects of Seed Money and Refunds on Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign. Journal of Political Economy, 110(1), 215–233.
De Quidt, Jonathan, Haushofer, Johannes, & Roth, Christopher. (2018). Measuring and bounding experimenter demand. American Economic Review, 108(11), 3266–3302.
Rabin, Matthew. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review,, 1281–1302.
Recalde, María P., Riedl, Arno, & Vesterlund, Lise. (2018). Error-prone inference from response time: The case of intuitive generosity in public-good games. Journal of Public Economics, 160, 132–147.
Rigdon, Mary L., McCabe, Kevin A., & Smith, Vernon L. (2007). Sustaining cooperation in trust games. The Economic Journal, 117(522), 991–1007.
Rotemberg, Julio J. (2008). Minimally acceptable altruism and the ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 66(3), 457–476.
Shang, Jen, & Croson, Rachel. (2009). A Field Experiment in Charitable Contribution: The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods. The Economic Journal, 119(540), 1422–1439.
Thöni, Christian, & Volk, Stefan. (2018). Conditional cooperation: Review and refinement. Economics Letters, 171, 37–40.
Tversky, Amos, & Kahneman, Daniel. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
Velez, Maria Alejandra, Stranlund, John K., & Murphy, James J. (2009). What motivates common pool resource users? Experimental evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(3), 485–497.
Vesterlund, Lise. (2003). The informational value of sequential fundraising. Journal of Public Economics, 87(3–4), 627–657.
Wilson, Bart J. (2014). The meaning of deceive in experimental economic science. In The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics: Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Wilson, Bart J., Jaworski, Taylor, Schurter, Karl E., & Smyth, Andrew. (2012). The ecological and civil mainsprings of property: An experimental economic history of whalers’ rules of capture. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 28(4), 617–656.