What determines the acceptance of Climate Smart Technologies? The influence of farmers' behavioral drivers in connection with the policy environment

Abadi, 2020, The contribution of diverse motivations for adhering to soil conservation initiatives and the role of conservation agriculture features in decision-making, Agr. Syst., 182, 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102849 Aguilar-Gallegos, 2015, Information networks that generate economic value: a study on clusters of adopters of new or improved technologies and practices among oil palm growers in Mexico, Agr. Syst., 135, 122, 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.01.003 Amadu, 2020, Understanding the adoption of climate-smart agriculture: a farm-level typology with empirical evidence from southern Malawi, World Dev., 126, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104692 Arbuckle, 2015, Understanding farmer perspectives on climate change adaptation and mitigation, Environ. Behav., 47, 205, 10.1177/0013916513503832 Ariti, 2018, Farmers’ participation in the development of land use policies for the central Rift Valley of Ethiopia, Land Use Policy, 71, 129, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.051 Arslan, 2015, Climate smart agriculture? Assessing the adaptation implications in Zambia, J. Agric. Econ., 66, 753, 10.1111/1477-9552.12107 Aryal, 2018, Adoption of multiple climate-smart agricultural practices in the Gangetic plains of Bihar, India, Int J Clim Chang Strateg Manag, 10 Asamblea Legislativa de la República de Costa Rica, 2020, Ley 2762 Ley sobre el régime de relaciones entre productores, beneficiadores y exportadores de café, Decreto Legislativo N, 9872 Ascough, 2002, Computer use and satisfaction by Great Plains producers: ordered logit model analysis, Agron. J., 94, 1263, 10.2134/agronj2002.1263 Autio, 2021, Constraints for adopting climate-smart agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Southeast Kenya, Agr. Syst., 194, 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103284 Baca, 2014, An integrated framework for assessing vulnerability to climate change and developing adaptation strategies for coffee growing families in mesoamerica, PloS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0088463 Bemelmans-Videc, 1998 Benitez-Altuna, 2021, Factors affecting the adoption of ecological intensification practices: a case study in vegetable production in Chile, Agr. Syst., 194, 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103283 Beza, 2018, Exploring farmers’ intentions to adopt mobile short message service (SMS) for citizen science in agriculture, Comput. Electron. Agric., 151, 295, 10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.015 Blackman, 2012, Does eco-certification have environmental benefits? Organic coffee in Costa Rica, Ecol. Econ., 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.001 Bopp, 2019, The role of farmers’ intrinsic motivation in the effectiveness of policy incentives to promote sustainable agricultural practices, J. Environ. Manage., 244, 320, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.107 Borrás, 2011, Policy learning and organizational capacities in innovation policies, Sci. Public Policy, 38, 725, 10.3152/030234211X13070021633323 Bouroncle, 2017, Mapping climate change adaptive capacity and vulnerability of smallholder agricultural livelihoods in Central America: ranking and descriptive approaches to support adaptation strategies, Clim. Change, 141, 123, 10.1007/s10584-016-1792-0 Bruno, 2022, Determinants of household recycling intention: the acceptance of public policy moderated by habits, social influence, and perceived time risk, Environ. Sci. Policy, 136, 1, 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.010 Bunn, 2015, A bitter cup: climate change profile of global production of Arabica and Robusta coffee, Clim. Change, 129, 89, 10.1007/s10584-014-1306-x Campbell, 2014, Sustainable intensification: what is its role in climate smart agriculture?, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 8, 39, 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.002 Carter, 2018, Climate-smart land use requires local solutions, transdisciplinary research, policy coherence and transparency, Carbon Manag, 1 Chandra, 2018, Climate-smart agriculture: perspectives and framings, Clim. Pol., 18, 526, 10.1080/14693062.2017.1316968 de Groot, 2012, How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies, Environ. Sci. Policy, 19–20, 100, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.004 de Oca, 2021, Adoption pathway analysis: representing the dynamics and diversity of adoption for agricultural practices, Agr. Syst., 191 de Vries, 2021, Psychology: The missing link in transitions research, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 41, 42, 10.1016/j.eist.2021.09.015 Dessart, 2019, Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: A policy-oriented review, 417 Edmondson, 2019, The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions, Res. Policy, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.010 Engler, 2019, Toward understanding conservation behavior in agriculture as a dynamic and mutually responsive process between individuals and the social system, J. Soil Water Conserv., 74, 74A, 10.2489/jswc.74.4.74A Faisal, 2020, Modeling smallholder livestock herders’ intentions to adopt climate smart practices: an extended theory of planned behavior, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 27, 39105, 10.1007/s11356-020-09652-w Faling, 2019, Cross-boundary policy entrepreneurship for climate-smart agriculture in Kenya, Policy. Sci., 52, 525, 10.1007/s11077-019-09355-1 Faridi, 2020, Attitude components affecting adoption of soil and water conservation measures by paddy farmers in Rasht County, Northern Iran, Land use policy, 99, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104885 Feder, 1993, The adoption of agricultural innovations: a review, Technol Forecast Soc Change, 43, 215, 10.1016/0040-1625(93)90053-A Feder, 1985, Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey, Econ Dev Cult Change, 33, 255, 10.1086/451461 Fraley, 2002, Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation, J. Am. Statistical Assoc., 97, 611, 10.1198/016214502760047131 Fusco, 2020, How to improve the diffusion of climate-smart agriculture: what the literature tells us, Sustainability (Switzerland), 10.3390/su12125168 Gardezi, 2022, Prioritizing climate-smart agriculture: an organizational and temporal review, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang., 10.1002/wcc.755 Gazheli, 2015, The behavioral basis of policies fostering long-run transitions: stakeholders, limited rationality and social context, Futures, 69, 14, 10.1016/j.futures.2015.03.008 Giua, 2022, Smart farming technologies adoption: which factors play a role in the digital transition?, Technol Soc, 68, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101869 Greene, 2003 Greene, 2009 Hair, 2010 Harvey, 2018, Climate change impacts and adaptation among smallholder farmers in Central America, Agric Food Secur, 7, 57, 10.1186/s40066-018-0209-x Harvey, 2021, Transformation of coffee-growing landscapes across Latin America. A review, Agron Sustain Dev, 41, 10.1007/s13593-021-00712-0 Hermans, 2021, Why we should rethink ‘adoption’ in agricultural innovation: empirical insights from Malawi, Land Degrad. Dev., 32, 1809, 10.1002/ldr.3833 Hochman, 2017, Smallholder farmers managing climate risk in India: 2. Is it climate-smart?, Agr. Syst., 151, 61, 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.11.007 Honig, 2015, The conditions under which farmers are likely to adapt their behaviour: a case study of private land conservation in the Cape Winelands, South Africa, Land Use Policy, 48, 389, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.016 Howlett, 2013, Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: assessing policy portfolio design, Politics and Governance, 1, 170, 10.17645/pag.v1i2.95 Huttunen, 2014, The need for policy coherence to trigger a transition to biogas production, Environ Innov Soc Transit, 12, 14, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.002 Hyland, 2018, Factors underlying farmers’ intentions to adopt best practices: the case of paddock based grazing systems, Agr. Syst., 162, 97, 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.023 ICAFE, 2022 IMN, MINAE, 2021 INEC, 2021 IPCC, 2022, Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability Islam, 2017, Determinants and implications of crop production loss: an empirical exploration using ordered probit analysis, Land Use Policy, 67, 527, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.021 Jorgensen, 2015, Understanding farmer intentions to connect to a modernised delivery system in an Australian irrigation district: a reasoned action approach, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 58, 513, 10.1080/09640568.2013.864620 Kanda, 2022, Policy coherence in a fragmented context: the case of biogas systems in Brazil, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 87, 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102454 Kangogo, 2021, Adoption of climate-smart agriculture among smallholder farmers: does farmer entrepreneurship matter?, Land Use Policy, 109, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105666 Kaufman, 2021, Behaviour in sustainability transitions: a mixed methods literature review, Environ Innov Soc Transit, 40, 586, 10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.010 Kern, 2009, Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector, Policy Sci, 42, 391, 10.1007/s11077-009-9099-x Kernecker, 2021, Farmer-centered ecological intensification: using innovation characteristics to identify barriers and opportunities for a transition of agroecosystems towards sustainability, Agr. Syst., 191, 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103142 Khoza, 2021, A gender-differentiated analysis of climate-smart agriculture adoption by smallholder farmers: application of the extended technology acceptance model, Gend. Technol. Dev., 25, 1, 10.1080/09718524.2020.1830338 Kivimaa, 2021, Interplay between low-carbon energy transitions and national security: an analysis of policy integration and coherence in Estonia, Finland and Scotland, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 75, 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102024 Kivimaa, 2013 Kuehne, 2017, Predicting farmer uptake of new agricultural practices: a tool for research, extension and policy, Agr. Syst., 156, 115, 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.06.007 Kuntosch, 2018, Linking system perspectives with user perspectives to identify adoption barriers to food security innovations for smallholder farmers – evidence from rural Tanzania, Food Secur, 10, 881, 10.1007/s12571-018-0821-4 Lalani, 2016, Smallholder farmers’ motivations for using conservation agriculture and the roles of yield, labour and soil fertility in decision making, Agr. Syst., 146, 80, 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.04.002 Lambin, 2014, Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions, Glob. Environ. Chang., 28, 129, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.007 Leeuwis, 2011, Rethinking communication in innovation processes: creating space for change in complex systems, Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 17, 21, 10.1080/1389224X.2011.536344 Leeuwis, 2004 Li, 2021, Climate change risk perceptions, facilitating conditions and health risk management intentions: evidence from farmers in rural China, Clim. Risk Manag., 32 Liang, 2012, An empirical research on poor rural agricultural information technology services to adopt, Procedia Eng, 29, 1578, 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.176 Liao, 2003, Knowledge management technologies and applications—literature review from 1995 to 2002, Expert Syst. Appl., 25, 155, 10.1016/S0957-4174(03)00043-5 Long, 2016, Barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture in Europe: evidence from the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy, J. Clean. Prod., 112, 9, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.044 Maestre-Andrés, 2019, Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature, Climate Policy, 19, 1186, 10.1080/14693062.2019.1639490 Magro, 2019, Policy-mix evaluation: governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies, Res. Policy, 48, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.010 Makate, 2019, Effective scaling of climate smart agriculture innovations in African smallholder agriculture: a review of approaches, policy and institutional strategy needs, Environ. Sci. Policy, 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.01.014 Markard, 2008, Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework, Res Policy, 37, 596, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004 McCarthy, 2018, 31 Meemken, 2021, Sustainability standards in global agrifood supply chains, Nat Food., 10.1038/s43016-021-00360-3 Mills, 2018, Understanding farmers’ motivations for providing unsubsidised environmental benefits, Land Use Policy, 76, 697, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.053 Mohr, 2021, Acceptance of artificial intelligence in German agriculture: an application of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior, Precis. Agric., 22, 1816, 10.1007/s11119-021-09814-x Molina-Maturano, 2021, Understanding smallholder farmers’ intention to adopt agricultural apps: the role of mastery approach and innovation hubs in Mexico, Agronomy, 11, 10.3390/agronomy11020194 Muscat, 2021, Food, energy or biomaterials? Policy coherence across agro-food and bioeconomy policy domains in the EU, Environ. Sci. Policy, 123, 21, 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.001 Mwongera, 2017, Climate smart agriculture rapid appraisal (CSA-RA): A tool for prioritizing context-specific climate smart agriculture technologies, Agr. Syst., 151, 192, 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.009 Napoleon, 2011, A new method for dimensionality reduction using K- means clustering algorithm for high dimensional data set, Int. J. Comput. Appl., 13 Nilsson, 2012, Understanding policy coherence: analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU, Environ. Policy Gov., 22, 395, 10.1002/eet.1589 Nilsson, 2016, Public acceptability towards environmental policy measures: value-matching appeals, Environ. Sci. Policy, 61, 176, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.013 Notenbaert, 2017, Targeting, out-scaling and prioritising climate-smart interventions in agricultural systems: lessons from applying a generic framework to the livestock sector in sub-Saharan Africa, Agr. Syst., 151, 153, 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.017 OECD, 2019, Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development 2019. Empowering people and ensuring inclusiveness and equality, policy coherence for sustainable development 2019, OECD Publishing, Paris. Ornstein, 2014 Panhuysen, 2020 Pannell, 2020, The roles of adoption and behavior change in agricultural policy, Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy, 42, 31, 10.1002/aepp.13009 Pannell, 2020, Understanding adoption of innovations and behavior change to improve agricultural policy, Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy, 42, 3, 10.1002/aepp.13013 Pannell, 2006, Adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders, Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 1407, 10.1071/EA05037 Poortvliet, 2018, Acceptance of new sanitation: the role of end-users’ pro-environmental personal norms and risk and benefit perceptions, Water Res., 131, 90, 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.032 Programa Estado Nación, 2020 Prokopy, 2008, Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: evidence from the literature, J. Soil Water Conserv., 63, 300, 10.2489/jswc.63.5.300 Prokopy, 2019, Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature, J. Soil Water Conserv., 74, 520, 10.2489/jswc.74.5.520 Rogge, 2018, Designing complex policy mixes, 34–58 Rogge, 2018, What makes them believe in the low-carbon energy transition? Exploring corporate perceptions of the credibility of climate policy mixes, Environ. Sci. Policy, 87, 74, 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.009 Rogge, 2016, Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis, Res Policy, 45, 1620, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 Rogge, 2018, Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany, Res Policy, 47, 1639, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.011 Ronaghi, 2020, A contextualized study of the usage of the internet of things (IoTs) in smart farming in a typical middle eastern country within the context of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model (UTAUT), Technol. Soc., 63, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101415 Rose, 2016, Decision support tools for agriculture: towards effective design and delivery, Agr. Syst., 149, 165, 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.009 Rosenow, 2017, The need for comprehensive and well targeted instrument mixes to stimulate energy transitions: the case of energy efficiency policy, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 33, 95, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.013 Runhaar, 2017, Governing the transformation towards ‘nature-inclusive’ agriculture: insights from the Netherlands, Int J Agric Sustain, 15, 340, 10.1080/14735903.2017.1312096 Sain, 2017, Costs and benefits of climate-smart agriculture: the case of the dry corridor in Guatemala, Agr. Syst., 151, 163, 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.004 Schaafsma, 2019, Assessing smallholder preferences for incentivised climate-smart agriculture using a discrete choice experiment, Land Use Policy, 88, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104153 Schaak, 2018, Understanding the adoption of grazing practices in German dairy farming, Agr. Syst., 165, 230, 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.06.015 Scherer, 2017, Mapping and linking supply- and demand-side measures in climate-smart agriculture. A review, Agron Sustain Dev, 10.1007/s13593-017-0475-1 Scherr, 2012, From climate-smart agriculture to climate-smart landscapes, Agric Food Secur., 10.1186/2048-7010-1-12 Shafinah, 2013, Determinants of user behavior intention (BI) on Mobile services: a preliminary view, Procedia Technol., 11, 127, 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.171 Shang, 2021, Adoption and diffusion of digital farming technologies - integrating farm-level evidence and system interaction, Agr. Syst., 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103074 Snider, 2017, Small farmer cooperatives and voluntary coffee certifications: rewarding progressive farmers of engendering widespread change in Costa Rica?, Food Policy, 69, 231, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.04.009 Streletskaya, 2020, Agricultural adoption and behavioral economics: bridging the gap, Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy, 42, 54, 10.1002/aepp.13006 Sun, 2018, Climate-smart management can further improve winter wheat yield in China, Agr. Syst., 162, 10, 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.010 Tatsvarei, 2018, Farmer perceptions in Mashonaland East Province on Zimbabwe’s agricultural land rental policy, Land Use Policy, 75, 468, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.015 Thornton, 2018, 385 Thornton, 2018, A framework for priority-setting in climate smart agriculture research, Agr. Syst., 167, 161, 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.09.009 Thow, 2018, Improving policy coherence for food security and nutrition in South Africa: a qualitative policy analysis, Food Secur, 10, 1105, 10.1007/s12571-018-0813-4 Upham, 2019, Thinking about individual actor-level perspectives in sociotechnical transitions: A comment on the transitions research agenda, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. Vaast, 2016, Coffee and cocoa production in agroforestry—A climate-smart agriculture model, 465 van der Linden, 2015, The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: towards a comprehensive model, J. Environ. Psychol., 41, 112, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012 Venkatesh, 2003, User acceptance of information technology: toward an unified view, MIS Q., 27, 425, 10.2307/30036540 Verburg, 2019, An innovation perspective to climate change adaptation in coffee systems, Environ. Sci. Policy, 97, 16, 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.03.017 Westermann, 2018, Scaling up agricultural interventions: case studies of climate-smart agriculture, Agr. Syst., 165, 283, 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.07.007 World Bank, CIAT, CATIE, 2014 Zhou, 2010, Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption, Comput Human Behav, 26, 760, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.013 Zizinga, 2022, Climate change and maize productivity in Uganda: simulating the impacts and alleviation with climate smart agriculture practices, Agr. Syst., 199, 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103407 Zougmoré, 2019, Science-policy interfaces for sustainable climate-smart agriculture uptake: lessons learnt from national science-policy dialogue platforms in West Africa, Int. J. Agric. Sustain., 17, 367, 10.1080/14735903.2019.1670934