What builds consumer intention to use smart water meters – Extended TAM-based explanation

Water Resources and Economics - Tập 44 - Trang 100233 - 2023
Konstantinos Madias1, Andrzej Szymkowiak1, Barbara Borusiak1
1Poznan University of Economics and Business, Poznan, Poland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Gautam, 2020, Monitoring and forecasting water consumption and detecting leakage using an IoT system, Water Supply, 20, 1103, 10.2166/ws.2020.035 Sayre, 2019, Groundwater depletion in India: social losses from costly well deepening, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 93, 85, 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.11.002 Farah, 2017, Smart water for leakage detection: feedback about the use of automated meter reading technology, 2017 Sensors Networks Smart and Emerging Technologies (SENSET), 1 Willis, 2010, Alarming visual display monitors affecting shower end use water and energy conservation in Australian residential households, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 54, 1117, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.004 Boyle, 2013, Intelligent metering for urban water: a review, Water, 5, 1052, 10.3390/w5031052 Liu, 2018, Digital metering feedback and changes in water consumption – a review, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 134, 136, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.010 Joo, 2015, Field application of waterworks automated meter reading systems and analysis of household water consumption, Desalination Water Treat., 54, 1401, 10.1080/19443994.2014.889609 Erickson, 2012, The dubuque water portal: evaluation of the uptake, use and impact of residential water consumption feedback Stern, 1994, The value basis of environmental concern, J. Soc. Issues, 50, 65, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x Fransson, 1999, Environmental Concert: conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings, J. Environ. Psychol., 19, 369, 10.1006/jevp.1999.0141 Borusiak, 2021, The role of environmental concern in explaining attitude towards second-hand shopping, Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9, 71, 10.15678/EBER.2021.090205 Kumar, 2017, Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: a conceptual framework and empirical study, J. Retailing Consum. Serv., 34, 1, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.09.004 Michaelis, 2020, The frugal entrepreneur: a self-regulatory perspective of resourceful entrepreneurial behavior, J. Bus. Ventur., 35, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105969 Dobre, 2009, Consumer innovativeness: a marketing approach, Manag. Market., 4 Montginoul, 2018, Smart metering: a water-saving solution? Consider communication strategies and user perceptions first. Evidence from a French case study, Environ. Model. Software, 104, 188, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.02.006 Davis, 1989, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Q., 13, 319, 10.2307/249008 Lederer, 2000, The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web, Decis. Support Syst., 29, 269, 10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00076-2 Tsourela, 2020, An internet of things (IoT) acceptance model. Assessing consumer's behavior toward IoT products and applications, Future Internet, 12, 191, 10.3390/fi12110191 Jeyaraj, 2006, A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research, J. Inf. Technol., 21, 1, 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056 Chong, 2012, Predicting consumer decisions to adopt mobile commerce: cross country empirical examination between China and Malaysia, Decis. Support Syst., 53, 34, 10.1016/j.dss.2011.12.001 Hsu, 2004, Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience, Inf. Manag., 41, 853, 10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014 Lu, 2005, Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology, J. Strat. Inf. Syst., 14, 245, 10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.003 Gao, 2014, A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology, Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist., 26, 211, 10.1108/APJML-06-2013-0061 Renny, 2013, Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and attitude towards online shopping usefulness towards online airlines ticket purchase, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 81, 212, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.415 Lee, 2013, An investigation of employees' use of e-learning systems: applying the technology acceptance model, Behav. Inf. Technol., 32, 173, 10.1080/0144929X.2011.577190 Lee, 2012, A unified perspective on the factors influencing usage intention toward mobile financial services, J. Bus. Res., 65, 1590, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.044 Venkatesh, 2000, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, Manag. Sci., 46, 186, 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 Revels, 2010, Understanding consumer intention to use mobile services, Australas. Market J., 18, 74, 10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.02.002 Lastovicka, 1999, Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: theory and measurement, J. Consum. Res., 26, 85, 10.1086/209552 Wang, 2021, The unexpected effect of frugality on green purchase intention, J. Retailing Consum. Serv., 59, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102385 Suárez, 2020, Determinants of frugal behavior: the influences of consciousness for sustainable consumption, materialism, and the consideration of future consequences, Front. Psychol., 11, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567752 Kropfeld, 2018, The ecological impact of anticonsumption lifestyles and environmental concern, J. Publ. Pol. Market., 37, 245, 10.1177/0743915618810448 Agarwal, 1998, A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology, Inf. Syst. Res., 9, 204, 10.1287/isre.9.2.204 Lewis, 2003, Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers, MIS Q., 27, 657, 10.2307/30036552 Lu, 2003, Technology acceptance model of wireless Internet, Internet Res., 13, 206, 10.1108/10662240310478222 Lu, 2005, Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless internet services via mobile technology, J. Strat. Inf. Syst., 14, 245, 10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.003 Dunlap, 2002, 484 Wang, 2022, Consumers' intention to bring a reusable bag for shopping in China: extending the theory of planned behavior, Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health, 19, 10.3390/ijerph19063638 Hartmann, 2012, Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: the roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern, J. Bus. Res., 65, 1254, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.11.001 Ham, 2013, Role of perceived fit with hotels' green practices in the formation of customer loyalty: impact of environmental concerns, Asia Pac. J. Tourism Res., 18, 731, 10.1080/10941665.2012.695291 Jekria, 2016, Environmental concern and recycling behaviour, Procedia Econ. Finance, 35, 667, 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00082-4 Li, 2022, Environmental concern, environmental knowledge, and residents' water conservation behavior: evidence from China, Water (Switzerland), 14 Chuah, 2020, Sustaining customer engagement behavior through corporate social responsibility: the roles of environmental concern and green trust, J. Clean. Prod., 262, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121348 Schierz, 2010, Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: an empirical analysis, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 9, 209, 10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.005 Bagozzi, 2012, Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models, J. Acad. Market. Sci., 40, 8, 10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x Chin, 1997, Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: the development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation, Inf. Syst. Res., 8, 342, 10.1287/isre.8.4.342 Henseler, 2015, A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, J. Acad. Market. Sci., 43, 115, 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 Lule, 2012, vol. 6 Weng, 2018, A TAM-based study of the attitude towards use intention of multimedia among school teachers, Applied System Innovation, 1, 36, 10.3390/asi1030036 Gumz, 2022, What improves smart meters' implementation? A statistical meta-analysis on smart meters' acceptance, Smart Sustain. Built Environ., 11, 1116, 10.1108/SASBE-05-2021-0080 Ellabban, 2016, Smart grid customers' acceptance and engagement: an overview, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 65, 1285, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.021 Goulas, 2022, Public perceptions of household IoT smart water “event” meters in the UK—implications for urban water governance [original research], Fron. Sustain. Cities, 4 Chawla, 2020, Attitudes and opinions of social media users towards smart meters' rollout in Turkey, Energies, 13, 732, 10.3390/en13030732 Gosnell, 2023, Market failures and willingness to accept smart meters: experimental evidence from the UK, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 118, 10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102756 Ma, 2017, Perceived ease of use and usefulness of sustainability labels on apparel products: application of the technology acceptance model, Fashion and Textiles, 4, 3, 10.1186/s40691-017-0093-1 Harryanto, 2019 Muiños, 2015, Frugality and psychological wellbeing. The role of voluntary restriction and the resourceful use of resources/Frugalidad y bienestar psicológico. El papel de la restricción voluntaria y el uso ingenioso de recursos, PsyEcology, 6, 169, 10.1080/21711976.2015.1026083 Lee, 2019, The effect of anti-consumption lifestyle on consumer's attitude and purchase intention toward commercial sharing systems, Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist., 31, 1422, 10.1108/APJML-06-2018-0218 Boo, 2022, An integrative model of facial recognition check-in technology adoption intention: the perspective of hotel guests in Singapore [Article], Int. J. Contemp. Hospit. Manag., 34, 4052, 10.1108/IJCHM-12-2021-1471 Willis, 2011, Quantifying the influence of environmental and water conservation attitudes on household end use water consumption, J. Environ. Manag., 92, 1996, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.023 Bugden, 2019, A synthetic view of acceptance and engagement with smart meters in the United States, Energy Res. Social Sci., 47, 137, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.025 Aprile, 2016 Teo, 2010, Explaining the intention to use technology among student teachers: an application of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Campus-Wide Inf. Syst., 27, 60, 10.1108/10650741011033035 Taber, 2018, The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education, Res. Sci. Educ., 48, 1273, 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2