What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods?

Badoe, 2000, Transportation-land use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling, Transportation Research D, 5, 235, 10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00036-X

Bagley, 2002, A methodology for the disaggregate, multidimensional measurement of residential neighbourhood type, Urban Studies, 39, 689, 10.1080/00420980220119525

Ben-Akiva, 1985

Boarnet, 2001

Cervero, 1996, Traditional neighborhoods and commuting in the San Francisco Bay Area, Transportation, 23, 373, 10.1007/BF00223062

Cervero, 1996, Mixed land uses and commuting: evidence from the American Housing Survey, Transportation Research A, 30, 361

Cervero, 2002, Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework, Transportation Research D, 7, 265, 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00024-4

Cervero, 2002

Cervero, 1997, Travel demand and the 3 Ds: density, diversity and design, Transportation Research D, 2, 199, 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6

Cervero, 1996, Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods, Transport Policy, 3, 127, 10.1016/0967-070X(96)00016-9

Crane, 2000, The influence of urban form on travel: an interpretive review, Journal of Planning Literature, 15, 3, 10.1177/08854120022092890

Curry, R.W., Jr., 2000. Attitudes toward travel: the relationships among perceived mobility, travel liking, and relative desired mobility. Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis. Available from: <www.its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2000/RR-00-06.pdf>

Feldman, 1990, Settlement-identity: psychological bonds with home places in a mobile society, Environment and Behavior, 22, 183, 10.1177/0013916590222002

Frank, 1994, Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking, Transportation Research Record, 1466, 44

Fry, 1996, A Monte Carlo study of tests for the independence of irrelevant alternatives property, Transportation Research B, 30, 19, 10.1016/0191-2615(95)00019-4

Fujii, 2003, What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change, Transportation, 30, 81, 10.1023/A:1021234607980

Golob, 1998, Greenhouse gas emissions and Australian commuters’ attitudes and behavior concerning abatement policies and personal involvement, Transportation Research D, 3, 1, 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00006-0

Hagman, 2003, Mobilizing meanings of mobility: car users’ constructions of the goods and bads of car use, Transportation Research D, 8, 1, 10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00014-7

Handy, 1996, Urban form and pedestrian choices: study of Austin neighborhoods, Transportation Research Record, 1552, 135, 10.3141/1552-19

Hanson, 1987, Accessibility and intraurban travel, Environment and Planning A, 19, 735, 10.1068/a190735

Hensher, 2000, Trip chaining as a barrier to the propensity to use public transport, Transportation, 27, 341, 10.1023/A:1005246916731

Kitamura, 1997, A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area, Transportation, 24, 125, 10.1023/A:1017959825565

Koppelman, 1981, Attitudinal analysis of work/school travel, Transportation Science, 15, 233, 10.1287/trsc.15.3.233

Law, 1999, Beyond ‘women and transport’: towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility, Progress in Human Geography, 23, 567, 10.1191/030913299666161864

Levine, 1999, Access to choice, Access (magazine of the University of California Transportation Center), 14, 16

Mokhtarian, 2001, Understanding the demand for travel: it’s not purely ‘derived’, Innovation, 14, 355

Næss, 1995, Travelling distances, modal split and transportation in thirty residential areas in Oslo, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 38, 349, 10.1080/09640569512913

Pickup, 1984, Women’s gender role and its influence on travel behaviour, Built Environment, 10, 61

Recker, 1976, An attitudinal modal choice model, Transportation Research, 10, 299, 10.1016/0041-1647(76)90109-X

Redmond, L.S., 2000. Identifying and analyzing travel-related attitudinal, personality, and lifestyle clusters in the San Francisco Bay Area. Master’s Thesis, Transportation Technology and Policy Graduate Group, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis. Available from: <http://repositories.cdlib.org/itsdavis/UCD-ITS-RR-00-08>

Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P.L., 2003. Does dissonance between desired and current neighborhood type affect individual travel behaviour? An empirical assessment from the San Francisco Bay Area. In: Proceedings of the European Transport Conference (ETC), 8–10 October 2003, Strasbourg, France. Available from: <www.its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2003/RP-03-18.pdf>

Schwanen, 2004, The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 759, 10.1068/b3039

Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P.L., submitted for publication. The impact of attitudes toward travel and land use on residential location choice: some empirical evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Copy available from: [email protected]

Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P.L., in press. What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance traveled. Transportation Research D

Sermons, 2001, Assessing traveler responsiveness to land and location based accessibility and mobility solutions, Transportation Research D, 6, 417, 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00006-2

Srinivasan, 2002, Travel behavior at the household level: understanding linkages with residential choice, Transportation Research D, 7, 225, 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00021-9

Turner, 1997, Travel to work and household responsibility: new evidence, Transportation, 24, 397, 10.1023/A:1004945903696

Van, 2000, The contribution of mixed land uses to sustainable travel in cities, 139

Van Wee, 2003, Preferences for modes, residential location and travel behaviour: the relevance of land-use impacts on mobility, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 2