What a mesh! An Australian experience using national female continence surgery trends over 20 years
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Zhu L, Zhang L (2014) Current situation of transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse. Chin Med Sci J 29(3):188–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-9294(14)60067-5
Daly JO, Ahern S, Herkes R, O’Connell HE (2019) The Australasian pelvic floor procedure registry: not before time. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 59(4):473–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13030
University of Queensland (2017) Explaining the vaginal mesh controversy. https://medicine.uq.edu.au/article/2017/06/explaining-vaginal-mesh-controversy. Accessed 13 June 2020
Food and Drug Administration (2011) Urogynaecological surgical mesh: an update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse. https://www.fda.gov/media/81123/download. Accessed 15 June 2020
Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J (2016) Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012079
Drugwatch (2020) Transvaginal mesh verdicts and settlements against manufacturers. https://www.drugwatch.com/transvaginal-mesh/verdict-settlement/. Accessed 11 June 2020
Australian Government Department of Health (2019) therapeutic goods association (TGA) actions after review into urogynaecological surgical mesh implants. https://www.tga.gov.au/behind-news/review-urogynaecological-surgical-mesh-implants. Accessed 10 June 2020
Corporation AB (2017) Vaginal mesh implants: Class action against Johnson and Johnson begins in Federal Court. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-04/class-action-vaginal-mesh-implants-johnson-and-johnson/8674106. Accessed 10 June 2020
Senate Community Affairs References Committee (2017) Number of women in Australia who have had transvaginal mesh implants and related matters. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/MeshImplants. Accessed 10 June 2020
Sedrakyan A, Chughtai B, Mao J (2016) Regulatory warnings and use of surgical mesh in pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA Intern Med 176(2):275–277. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6595
Zealand USoAaN (2015) Position statement: mesh midurethral slings. https://www.usanz.org.au/info-resources/position-statements-guidelines/mesh-mid-urethral-slings. Accessed 10 June 2020
Obstetricians RAaNZCo and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) (2014) Position statement on midurethral slings. https://ranzcog.edu.au/RANZCOG_SITE/media/RANZCOG-MEDIA/Women%27s%20Health/Statement%20and%20guidelines/Clinical-Obstetrics/MUS-(C-Gyn-32)-Re-write-July-2020_1.pdf?ext=.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2020
(USANZ). USoAaNZ (2017) Submission to the Senate Inquiry into the number of women in Australia who have had transvaginal mesh implants and related matters by the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2019) Admitted Patient Care 2017–18: Australian Hospital Statistics. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/hospitals/hospitals-at-a-glance-2017-18/contents/surgery-in-australias-hospitals. Accessed 10 Mar 2021
Franzen K, Andersson G, Odeberg J, Midlöv P, Samuelsson E, Stenzelius K, Hammarström M (2015) Surgery for urinary incontinence in women 65 years and older: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 26(8):1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2573-9
Linden A (2015) Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons. Stata J 15(2):480–500
Palmerola R, Peyronnet B, Rebolos M, Khan A, Sussman RD, Escobar C, Smith S, Rosenblum N, Nitti VW (2019) Trends in stress urinary incontinence surgery at a tertiary center: midurethral sling use following the AUGS/SUFU position statement. Urology 131:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.050
Cammu H, Saeys F, Haentjens P (2010) Dramatic increase (1997–2007) in the number of procedures for stress urinary incontinence in Belgium. Int Urogynecol J 21(12):1511–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1226-x
Wu CJ, Tong YC, Hsiao SM, Liang CC, Liang SJ, Weng SF, Wu MP (2014) The surgical trends and time-frame comparison of primary surgery for stress urinary incontinence, 2006–2010 vs 1997–2005: a population-based nation-wide follow-up descriptive study. Int Urogynecol J 25(12):1683–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2443-5
Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J (2015) Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3
Trabuco EC, Linder BJ, Klingele CJ, Blandon RE, Occhino JA, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Gebhart JB (2018) Two-year results of burch compared with midurethral sling with sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 131(1):31–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002415
Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, Creta M, La Falce S, Waltregny D, Novara G (2017) Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 72(4):567–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.026
Zacche MM, Mukhopadhyay S, Giarenis I (2019) Changing surgical trends for female stress urinary incontinence in England. Int Urogynecol J 30(2):203–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3839-4
Rice NT, Hu Y, Slaughter JC, Ward RM (2013) Pelvic mesh complications in women before and after the 2011 FDA public health notification. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19(6):333–338. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182a330c1
Souders CP, Eilber KS, McClelland L, Wood LN, Souders AR, Steiner V, Anger JT (2018) The truth behind transvaginal mesh litigation: devices, timelines, and provider characteristics. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 24(1):21–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000000433
Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Bogani G, Meschia M, Sorice P, Braga A, Salvatore S, Ghezzi F, Serati M (2015) Urethral bulking agents versus other surgical procedures for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 189:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.025
Itkonen Freitas A-M, Mentula M, Rahkola-Soisalo P, Tulokas S, Mikkola TS (2020) Tension-free vaginal tape surgery versus polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for primary stress urinary incontinence: a randomized clinical trial. J Urol 203(2):372–378. https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000000517
Rac G, Younger A, Clemens JQ, Kobashi K, Khan A, Nitti V, Jacobs I, Lemack GE, Brown ET, Dmochowski R, MacLachlan L, Mourtzinos A, Ginsberg D, Koski M, Rames R, Rovner ES (2017) Stress urinary incontinence surgery trends in academic female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery urology practice in the setting of the food and drug administration public health notifications. Neurourol Urodyn 36(4):1155–1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23080
Perera M, Papa N, Kinnear N, Wetherell D, Lawrentschuk N, Webb D, Bolton D (2016) Urolithiasis treatment in australia: the age of ureteroscopic intervention. J Endourol 30(11):1194–1199. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0513