What It Takes to Be a Pioneer: Ability Expectations From Brain-Computer Interface Users

Wolpaw JR, Wolpaw EW (2012) Brain-computer interfaces: principles and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Bouton CE, Shaikhouni A, Annetta NV, Bockbrader MA, Friedenberg DA, Nielson DM, Sharma G, Sederberg PB, Glenn BC, Mysiw WJ (2016) Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia. Nature 533(7602):247–250

Graimann B, Allison B, Pfurtscheller G (2009) Brain–computer interfaces: a gentle introduction. In: Graimann B, Pfurtscheller G, Allison B (eds) Brain-computer interfaces. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–27

Mak JN, Wolpaw JR (2009) Clinical applications of brain-computer interfaces: current state and future prospects. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2:187–199. https://doi.org/10.1109/rbme.2009.2035356

Marchetti M, Priftis K (2015) Brain–computer interfaces in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a metanalysis. Clin Neurophysiol 126(6):1255–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.017

Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, McFarland DJ, Pfurtscheller G, Vaughan TM (2002) Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol 113(6):767–791

Daly JJ, Wolpaw JR (2008) Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation. The Lancet Neurology 7(11):1032–1043

Chaudhary U, Birbaumer N, Ramos-Murguialday A (2016) Brain-computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation. Nat Rev Neurol 12(9):513–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.113

Maksimenko VA, van Heukelum S, Makarov VV, Kelderhuis J, Lüttjohann A, Koronovskii AA, Hramov AE, van Luijtelaar G (2017) Absence seizure control by a brain computer interface. Sci Rep 7:2487

McFarland DJ, Daly J, Boulay C, Parvaz MA (2017) Therapeutic applications of BCI technologies. Brain-Computer Interfaces 4(1–2):37–52

Zafar MB, Shah KA, Malik HA Prospects of sustainable ADHD treatment through brain-computer interface systems. In: Innovations in Electrical Engineering and Computational Technologies (ICIEECT), 2017 International Conference on, 2017. IEEE, pp 1–6

Glannon W (2014) Neuromodulation, agency and autonomy. Brain Topogr 27(1):46–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-012-0269-3

Friedrich O, Racine E, Steinert S, Pömsl J, Jox RJ (2018) An analysis of the impact of brain-computer interfaces on autonomy. Neuroethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9364-9

Kleih SC, Kübler A (2014) Psychological perspectives: quality of life and motivation. In: Grübler G, Hildt E (eds) Brain-computer-interfaces in their ethical, social and cultural contexts. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 77–84

Holz E (2015) Systematic evaluation of non-invasive brain-computer interfaces as assistive devices for persons with severe motor impairment based on a user-centred approach—in controlled settings and independent use. Universität Würzburg, Würzburg

Holz EM, Botrel L, Kaufmann T, Kübler A (2015) Long-term independent brain-computer interface home use improves quality of life of a patient in the locked-in state: a case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96(3 Suppl):S16–S26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.035

Holz EM, Botrel L, Kübler A (2015) Independent home use of brain painting improves quality of life of two artists in the locked-in state diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain-Computer Interfaces 2(2–3):117–134

Nijboer F, Birbaumer N, Kübler A (2010) The influence of psychological state and motivation on brain-computer interface performance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis—a longitudinal study. Front Neurosci 4:55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00055

Holz EM, Höhne J, Staiger-Salzer P, Tangermann M, Kübler A (2013) Brain-computer interface controlled gaming: evaluation of usability by severely motor restricted end-users. Artif Intell Med 59(2):111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2013.08.001

Cincotti F, Mattia D, Aloise F, Bufalari S, Schalk G, Oriolo G, Cherubini A, Marciani MG, Babiloni F (2008) Non-invasive brain-computer interface system: towards its application as assistive technology. Brain Res Bull 75(6):796–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.007

Zickler C, Halder S, Kleih SC, Herbert C, Kübler A (2013) Brain painting: usability testing according to the user-centered design in end users with severe motor paralysis. Artif Intell Med 59(2):99–110

Pedrocchi A, Ferrante S, Ambrosini E, Gandolla M, Casellato C, Schauer T, Klauer C, Pascual J, Vidaurre C, Gfohler M, Reichenfelser W, Karner J, Micera S, Crema A, Molteni F, Rossini M, Palumbo G, Guanziroli E, Jedlitschka A, Hack M, Bulgheroni M, d'Amico E, Schenk P, Zwicker S, Duschau-Wicke A, Miseikis J, Graber L, Ferrigno G (2013) MUNDUS project: MUltimodal neuroprosthesis for daily upper limb support. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 10:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-66

Schicktanz S, Amelung T, Rieger JW (2015) Qualitative assessment of patients' attitudes and expectations toward BCIs and implications for future technology development. Front Syst Neurosci 9:64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00064

Zickler C, Di Donna V, Kaiser V, Al-Khodairy A, Kleih S, Kübler A, Malavasi M, Mattia D, Mongardi S, Neuper C, Rohm M, Rupp R, Staiger-Salzer P, Hoogerwerf E-J (2009) BCI applications for people with disabilities: defining user needs and user requirements. Paper presented at the 10th European Conference for the Advancement of Assistive Technology.

Blabe CH, Gilja V, Chestek CA, Shenoy KV, Anderson KD, Henderson JM (2015) Assessment of brain-machine interfaces from the perspective of people with paralysis. J Neural Eng 12(4):043002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/043002

Kageyama Y, Hirata M, Yanagisawa T, Shimokawa T, Sawada J, Morris S, Mizushima N, Kishima H, Sakura O, Yoshimine T (2014) Severely affected ALS patients have broad and high expectations for brain-machine interfaces. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration 15(7–8):513–519. https://doi.org/10.3109/21678421.2014.951943

Blankertz B, Tangermann M, Vidaurre C, Fazli S, Sannelli C, Haufe S, Maeder C, Ramsey L, Sturm I, Curio G, Müller K-R (2010) The Berlin brain–computer interface: non-medical uses of BCI technology. Front Neurosci 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00198

Van Erp JBF, Lotte F, Tangermann M (2012) Brain-computer interfaces: beyond medical applications. Computer—IEEE Computer Society 45(4):26–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2012.107

Kögel J, Schmid JR, Jox RJ, Friedrich O (2019) Using brain-computer interfaces: a scoping review of studies employing social research methods. BMC Medical Ethics 20(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0354-1

Kögel J, Jox RJ, Friedrich O (2020) What is it like to use a BCI?—insights from an interview study with brain-computer interface users. BMC Medical Ethics 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0442-2

Wolbring G, Diep L (2016) Cognitive/neuroenhancement through an ability studies lens. In: Jotterand F, Dubljevic V (eds) Cognitive enhancement. Oxford University Pres, Oxford, pp 57–75

Wolbring G (2012) Citizenship education through an ability expectation and “Ableism” lens: the challenge of science and technology and disabled people. Educ Sci 2:150–164. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci2030150

Wolbring G, Yumakulov S (2015) Education through an ability studies lens. Zeitschrift für Inklusion 10 (2)

Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Newbury Park

Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory. Sage, London

Allison BZ, Neuper C (2010) Could anyone use a BCI? Chapter from book. In: Tan DS, Nijholt A (eds) Brain-computer interfaces: applying our minds to human-computer interaction. Springer, London, pp 35–54

Allison BZ, Brunner C, Kaiser V, Müller-Putz G, Neuper C, Pfurtscheller G (2010) Toward a hybrid brain-computer interface based on imagined movement and visual attention. J Neural Eng 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/7/2/026007

Şahinol M (2016) Das techno-zerebrale Subjekt: Zur Symbiose von Mensch und Maschine in den Neurowissenschaften. Transcript, Bielefeld

Vidal F, Ortega F (2017) Being brains. In: Making the cerebral subject. Fordham University Press, New York

Douglas M (2003) Natural symbols. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon

Moser I (2006) Disability and the promises of technology: technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Inf Commun Soc 9(3):373–395

Friedrich EVC, Scherer R, Neuper C (2013) User-appropriate and robust control strategies to enhance brain–computer interface performance and usability. In: Guger C, Allison BZ, Edlinger G (eds) Brain-computer interface research: a state-of-the-art summary. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 15–23

Novak D (2019) Biomechatronic applications of brain-computer interfaces. In: Segil J (ed) Handbook of biomechatronics. Academic Press, London, pp 129–175

Kennedy PR, Adams KD (2003) A decision tree for brain-computer interface devices. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 11(2):148–150

Moghimi S, Kushki A, Marie Guerguerian A, Chau T (2013) A review of EEG-based brain-computer interfaces as access pathways for individuals with severe disabilities. Assist Technol 25(2):99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2012.723298

Thompson MC (2019) Critiquing the concept of BCI illiteracy. Sci Eng Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0061

Mühl C, Allison B, Nijholt A, Chanel G (2014) A survey of affective brain computer interfaces: principles, state-of-the-art, and challenges. Brain-Computer Interfaces 1(2):66–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2014.912881

Wu S, Xu X, Shu L, Hu B Estimation of valence of emotion using two frontal EEG channels. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 13–16 Nov. 2017. pp 1127–1130

Douglas M (2001) Purity and danger. An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge, New York