What Happens When Interviewers Ask Repeated Questions in Forensic Interviews with Children Alleging Abuse?
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Brock P, Fisher RP, Cutler BC (1999) Examining the cognitive interview in a double test paradigm. Psychol, Crime, Law 5:29–45
Dent HR, Stephenson GM (1979) An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 18:41–51
Fivush R, Schwarzmueller A (1995) Say it once again: effects of repeated questions on children’s event recall. J Trauma Stress 8:555–580
Fivush R, Shukat J (1995) What young children recall: issues of content, consistency and coherence of early autobiographical recall. In: Zaragoza MS, Graham JR, Hall GCN, Hirchman R, Ben-Porath YS (eds) Memory and testimony in the child witness. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 5–23
Gilbert JAE, Fisher RP (2006) The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Appl Cogn Psychol 20:723–739. doi: 10.1002/acp.1232
Goodman GS, Hirschman JE, Hepps D, Rudy L (1991) Children’s memory for stressful events. Merrill-Palmer Q 37:109–158
Holliday RE, Douglas KM, Hayes BK (1999) Children’s eyewitness suggestibility: memory trace strength revisited. Cogn Dev 14:443–462
Home Office (1992) Memorandum of good practice on video recorded interviews with child witnesses for criminal proceedings. Author, with Department of Health, London
Home Office (2002) Achieving the best evidence in criminal proceedings: guidance for vulnerable or intimidated witnesses, including children. Author, London
Home Office (2007) Achieving best evidence in criminal proceedings: guidance on interviewing victims and witnesses, and using special measures. Author, London, www.scie-socialcareonline.org.uk/profile.asp?guid=43a2847d-c419-45cb-9d5f-d66ac919f299
Howie P, Sheehan M, Mojarrad T, Wrzesinska M (2004) ‘Undesirable’ and ‘desirable’ shifts in children’s responses to repeated questions: age differences in the effect of providing a rationale for repetition. Appl Cogn Psychol 18:1161–1180. doi: 10.1002/acp.1049
Krähenbühl S, Blades M (2006) The effect of question repetition within interviews on young children’s eyewitness recall. J Exp Child Psychol 94:57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.12.002
Lamb ME, Hershkowitz I, Orbach Y, Esplin PW (2008) Tell me what happened: structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. Wiley
Lyon T (2002) Applying suggestibility research to the real world: the case of repeated questions. Law Contemp Probl 65:97–126, http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/65LCPLyon
Orbach Y, Lamb ME (2001) The relationship between within-interview contradictions and eliciting interviewer utterances. Child Abuse Negl 25:323–333
Orbach Y, Hershkowitz I, Lamb ME, Sternberg KJ, Esplin PW, Horowitz D (2000) Assessing the value of scripted protocols for forensic interviews of alleged abuse victims. Child Abuse Negl 24:733–752
Pezdek K, Roe C (1995) The effect of memory trace strength on suggestibility. J Exp Child Psych 60:116–128
Poole DA, Lamb ME (1998) Investigative interviews of children: a guide for helping professionals. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
Poole DA, White LT (1991) Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Dev Psychol 27:975–986
Poole DA, White LT (1993) Two years later: effects of question repetition and retention interval on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Dev Psychol 29:844–853
Scottish Executive (2003) Guidance interviewing child witnesses and victims in Scotland. Author, Edinbrugh, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2003/09/18265/27036
Sternberg KJ, Lamb ME, Davies GA, Westcott HL (2001) The memorandum of good practice: theory versus application. Child Abuse Negl 25:669–681
Warren AR, Garven S, Walker NE, Woodall CE (2000) Setting the record straight: how problematic are ‘typical’ child sexual abuse interviews? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, New Orleans, Louisiana