Weighted representative democracy

Journal of Mathematical Economics - Tập 88 - Trang 52-63 - 2020
Marcus Pivato1, Arnold Soh1
1THEMA, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, France

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abramowitz, 2019, Flexible representative democracy: an introduction with binary issues, 3 Alger, 2006, Voting by proxy, Public Choice, 126, 1, 10.1007/s11127-006-3059-1 Balinski, 2010 Barberà, 2006, On the weights of nations: assigning voting power to heterogeneous voters, J. Polit. Econ., 114, 317, 10.1086/501172 Besley, 2008, Issue unbundling via citizens’ initiatives, Q. J. Political Sci., 3, 379, 10.1561/100.00008059 Blum, 2016, Liquid democracy: Potentials, problems, and perspectives, J. Political Phil., 24, 162, 10.1111/jopp.12065 Bol, 2019, Electoral rules, strategic entry and polarization, J. Public Econ., 178 Brandt, 2016, Tournament solutions, 57 2016 Brill, 2018, Multiwinner approval rules as apportionment methods, J. Theor. Politics, 30, 358, 10.1177/0951629818775518 Brill, 2018, Pairwise liquid democracy, 137 Chamberlin, 1983, Representative deliberations and representative decisions: Proportional representation and the Borda rule, Amer. Political Sci. Rev., 77, 718, 10.2307/1957270 Christoff, 2017, Binary voting with delegable proxy: An analysis of liquid democracy, 134 Christoff, 2017 Clemen, 2007, Aggregating probability distributions, 154 Coffman, 2016, Representative democracy and the implementation of majority-preferred alternatives, Soc. Choice Welf., 46, 477, 10.1007/s00355-015-0922-3 Cohensius, 2017, Proxy voting for better outcomes, 858 Dasgupta, 2008, On the robustness of majority rule, J. Eur. Econom. Assoc., 6, 949, 10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.5.949 Downs, 1957 Duverger, 1959 Elkind, 2017, Properties of multiwinner voting rules, Soc. Choice Welf., 48, 599, 10.1007/s00355-017-1026-z 2017 Faliszewski, 2017, Multiwinner voting: A new challenge for social choice theory, 27 Farrell, 2011 Fischer, 2016, Weighted tournament solutions, 85 Fishburn, 1977, Condorcet social choice functions, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 33, 469, 10.1137/0133030 Fishkin, 2011 Fishkin, 2018 Genest, 1986, Combining probability distributions: a critique and an annotated bibliography, Statist. Sci., 1, 114 Green-Armytage, 2015, Direct voting and proxy voting, Const. Political Econ., 26, 190, 10.1007/s10602-014-9176-9 Grossi, 2014, Judgment aggregation: A primer, Synth. Lect. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn., 8, 1 Hanson, 2007, Logarithmic market scoring rules for modular combinatorial information aggregation, J. Predict. Mark., 1, 3, 10.5750/jpm.v1i1.417 Hoeffding, 1963, Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 58, 13, 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500830 Kahng, A., Mackenzie, S., Procaccia, A.D., 2018. Liquid democracy: An algorithmic perspective. In: Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. pp. 1095–1102. Kóczy, 2017, US vs. European apportionment practices: The conflict between monotonicity and proportionality, 309 Koriyama, 2013, Optimal apportionment, J. Political Econ., 121, 584, 10.1086/670380 2017, vol. 251 Laslier, 2017 Ledyard, 2002, The approximation of efficient public good mechanisms by simple voting schemes, J. Public Econ., 83, 153, 10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00161-4 Leib, 2004 List, 2009, Judgement aggregation: a survey, 457 Macé, 2018 May, 1952, A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision, Econometrica, 68, 0 McCarthy, 1956, Measures of the value of information, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 42, 654, 10.1073/pnas.42.9.654 Miller, 1969, A program for direct and proxy voting in the legislative process, Public Choice, 7, 107, 10.1007/BF01718736 Mongin, 2012, The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory, Theory and Decision, 73, 315, 10.1007/s11238-012-9310-y Nehring, 2011, Incoherent majorities: the McGarvey problem in judgement aggregation, Discrete Appl. Math., 159, 1488, 10.1016/j.dam.2011.03.014 Nehring, 2019, Majority rule in the absence of a majority, J. Econom. Theory, 183, 213, 10.1016/j.jet.2019.05.006 Nehring, 2019 Nehring, 2014, The Condorcet set: Majority voting over interconnected propositions, J. Econom. Theory, 151, 268, 10.1016/j.jet.2013.12.013 Ostrogorski, 1902 Paulin, A., 2014. Through liquid democracy to sustainable non-bureaucratic government. In: Proc. Int. Conf. for E-Democracy and Open Government. pp. 205–217. Pivato, 2015, Condorcet meets Bentham, J. Math. Econom., 59, 58, 10.1016/j.jmateco.2015.04.006 Pivato, 2017, Epistemic democracy with correlated voters, J. Math. Econom., 72, 51, 10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.06.001 Rae, 1976, The Ostrogorski Paradox: a peculiarity of compound majority decision, Eur. J. Political Res., 4, 391, 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1976.tb00542.x Ricca, 2017, A guided tour of the mathematics of seat allocation and political districting, 49 Savage, 1971, Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 66, 783, 10.1080/01621459.1971.10482346 Skowron, 2016, Finding a collective set of items: From proportional multirepresentation to group recommendation, Artificial Intelligence, 241, 191, 10.1016/j.artint.2016.09.003 Sterne, 1871 Tullock, 1967 Tullock, 1992, Computerizing politics, Math. Comput. Modelling, 16, 59, 10.1016/0895-7177(92)90087-2 Tziralis, 2007, Prediction markets: An extended literature review, J. Predict. Mark., 1, 75, 10.5750/jpm.v1i1.421 Wolfers, 2004, Prediction markets, J. Econ. Perspect., 18, 107, 10.1257/0895330041371321