We need a broader debate on the sustainability of blockchain

Joule - Tập 6 - Trang 1137-1141 - 2022
Alexander Rieger1, Tamara Roth1,2, Johannes Sedlmeir3,4, Gilbert Fridgen1
1Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
2University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
3FIM Research Center, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
4Branch Business & Information Systems Engineering of Fraunhofer FIT, Bayreuth, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Gallersdörfer, 2020, Energy consumption of cryptocurrencies beyond Bitcoin, Joule, 4, 1843, 10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.013 de Vries, 2022, Revisiting Bitcoin’s carbon footprint, Joule, 6, 498, 10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.005 IBM Food Trust. https://www.ibm.com//blockchain/solutions/food-trust. European Blockchain Services Infrastructure. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-building-blocks/wikis/display/EBSI/Home. Sadawi, 2021, A comprehensive hierarchical blockchain system for carbon emission trading utilizing blockchain of things and smart contract, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 173, 121124, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121124 Gallersdörfer, 2022, Energy efficiency and carbon footprint of proof of stake blockchain Protocols, Crypto Carbon Ratings Institute Sedlmeir, 2020, The energy consumption of blockchain technology: Beyond myth, Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62, 599, 10.1007/s12599-020-00656-x Digiconomist Bitcoin energy consumption Index and Ethereum energy consumption Index. https://digiconomist.net/. David, 2018, Ouroboros Praos: an adaptively-secure, semi-synchronous proof-of-stake blockchain, 66 2021 Petersson, 2021, A multilevel carbon and water footprint dataset of food commodities, Sci. Data, 8, 127, 10.1038/s41597-021-00909-8