Water resilience mapping of Chennai, India using analytical hierarchy process
Tóm tắt
The urban water system is the worst hit in global climate change. Water resilience is the system’s ability to retaliate and recover from various water-related disruptions. The present study aims to delineate the water resilience zones in Chennai city, Tamil Nadu, India, by effectively integrating the geographic information system, remote sensing, and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The methodology incorporated 15 vital factors. A multi-criteria decision analysis technique was adopted to assign a weight to each parameter using the AHP. A pairwise decision matrix was constructed, parameter’s relative importance and the consistency ratio were established. Integration of all maps by weighted overlay analysis technique depicted water resilience intensities of five different classes. Very low, low and moderate water resilience areas accounted for more than three-fourth of the study area. Area Under Curve score (80.12%) depicted the accuracy of the developed model. Sensitivity analysis determined the significance of the parameters in the delineation. The logical structural approach can be employed in other parts of India or elsewhere with modifications. This study is novel in its approach by holistically analyzing water resilience by integrating disruptions related to flood, drought and the city's water infrastructure system's adequacy and efficiency. Researchers and planners can effectively use the study results to ensure resilience as a new perspective on effective water resource management and climate change mitigation. It becomes a decision aid mechanism identifying where the system is vulnerable to potential water-related risks for employing resilience measures.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abebe Y, Kabir G, Tesfamariam S (2018) Assessing urban areas vulnerability to pluvial flooding using GIS applications and Bayesian Belief Network model. J Clean Prod 174:1629–1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.066
Achu AL, Thomas J, Reghunath R (2020) Multi-criteria decision analysis for delineation of groundwater potential zones in a tropical river basin using remote sensing, GIS and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Groundwater Sustain Dev 10:100365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100365
Aykut T (2021) Determination of groundwater potential zones using Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) between Edirne-Kalkansogut (northwestern Turkey). Groundwater Sustain Dev 12:100545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100545
Aon Benfield (2015) Global Catastrophe Recap November 2015 Report (Issue November). http://thoughtleadership.aon.com/Documents/20151208-if-november-global-recap.pdf
Aon Benfield (2016) 2015 Annual Global Climate and Catastrophe Report. http://thoughtleadership.aon.com/Documents/20160113-ab-if-annual-climate-catastrophe-report.pdf
Basabe P (2013) Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015. In: Bobrowsky PT (ed) Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_180
Bocchini P, Frangopol D, Ummenhofer T, Zinke T (2014) Resilience and sustainability of civil infrastructure: toward a unified approach. J Infrastruct Syst 20:4014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000177
Boyaj A, Ashok K, Ghosh S, Devanand A (2018) The Chennai extreme rainfall event in 2015: the Bay of Bengal connection. Clim Dyn 50(7):2867–2879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3778-7
Bremner L (2020) Planning the 2015 Chennai floods. Environ Plan E Nat Space 3(3):732–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619880130
CMWSSB (n.d.) Lake Storage Levels, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board. Retrieved September 18, 2021, from http://123.63.203.150/public/lake.htm
Corporation GC (2021) Missing Links Storm Water Drainage Project for the Core City Areas of Greater Chennai Corporation Environmental Impact Assessment Report (Issue January 2021)
Cutter SL, Burton CG, Emrich CT (2010) Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. J Homeland Secur Emerg Manage 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1732
Desalegn H, Mulu A (2021) Flood vulnerability assessment using GIS at Fetam watershed, upper Abbay basin, Ethiopia. Heliyon 7(1):e05865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05865
Ekmekcioğlu Ö, Koc K, Özger M (2021) District based flood risk assessment in Istanbul using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 35(3):617–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01924-8
Ekmekcioğlu Ö, Koc K, Özger M (2021b) Stakeholder perceptions in flood risk assessment: a hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach for Istanbul, Turkey. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 60:102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102327
Gogate NG, Kalbar PP, Raval PM (2017) Assessment of stormwater management options in urban contexts using multiple attribute decision-making. J Clean Prod 142:2046–2059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.079
Government of Tamil Nadu (2017) Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on Performance Audit of Flood Management and Response in Chennai and its Suburban Areas. http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Performance_Audit_of_Flood_Management_and_Response_in_Chennai_and_its_Suburban_Area.pdf
Hasan A, Elmualim A, Rameezdeen R, Baroudi B, Marshall A (2018) An exploratory study on the impact of mobile ICT on productivity in construction projects. Built Environ Project Asset Manage 8(3):320–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2017-0080
Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
Hoque MAA, Pradhan B, Ahmed N (2020) Assessing drought vulnerability using geospatial techniques in northwestern part of Bangladesh. Sci Total Environ 705:135957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135957
Jain P, Ramsankaran RAAJ (2019) GIS-based integrated multi-criteria modelling framework for watershed prioritisation in India—a demonstration in Marol watershed. J Hydrol 578:124131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124131
Kablan MKA, Dongo K, Coulibaly M (2017) Assessment of social vulnerability to flood in urban Côte d’Ivoire using the MOVE framework. Water 9(4):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9040292
Kazakis N, Kougias I, Patsialis T (2015) Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and analytical hierarchy process: application in Rhodope-Evros region, Greece. Sci Total Environ 538:555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.055
Khosravi K, Pham BT, Chapi K, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Revhaug I, Prakash I, Tien Bui D (2018) A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran. Sci Total Environ 627:744–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266
Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP (2011) Gestion des inondations et méthode de modélisation sous SIG pour évaluer les zones d’aléa inondation-une étude de cas. Hydrol Sci J 56(2):212–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.555836
Kourgialas NN, Anyfanti I, Karatzas GP, Dokou Z (2018) An integrated method for assessing drought prone areas—water efficiency practices for a climate resilient Mediterranean agriculture. Sci Total Environ 625:1290–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.051
Kumar PKD, Gopinath G, Seralathan P (2007) Application of remote sensing and GIS for the demarcation of groundwater potential zones of a river basin in Kerala, southwest coast of India. Int J Remote Sens 28(24):5583–5601. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160601086050
Mahmoud SH, Gan TY (2018) Multi-criteria approach to develop flood susceptibility maps in arid regions of Middle East. J Clean Prod 196:216–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.047
Marlow DR, Moglia M, Cook S, Beale DJ (2013) Towards sustainable urban water management: a critical reassessment. Water Res 47(20):7150–7161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.046
Massam BH (1988) Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques in planning. Progr Plan 30:1–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-9006(88)90012-8
Miller JD, Hutchins M (2017) The impacts of urbanisation and climate change on urban flooding and urban water quality: a review of the evidence concerning the United Kingdom. J Hydrol Reg Stud 12:345–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.06.006
Ministry of Urban Development, G. of I. (n.d.). Liveability standards in cities. https://smartnet.niua.org/sites/default/files/resources/LiveabilityStandards.pdf
Mishra AK, Singh VP (2009) Analysis of drought severity-area-frequency curves using a general circulation model and scenario uncertainty. J Geophys Res Atmos 114:D06120. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010986
Mosadeghi R, Warnken J, Tomlinson R, Mirfenderesk H (2015) Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Comput Environ Urban Syst 49:54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.001
Msabi MM, Makonyo M (2021) Flood susceptibility mapping using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis: a case of Dodoma region, central Tanzania. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ 21:100445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100445
Mujumdar M, Bhaskar P, Ramarao MVS, Uppara U, Goswami M, Borgaonkar H, Chakraborty S, Ram S, Mishra V, Rajeevan M, Niyogi D (2020) Droughts and floods. In: Krishnan R, Sanjay J, Gnanaseelan C, Mujumdar M, Kulkarni A, Chakraborty S (eds) Assessment of Climate Change over the Indian Region. Springer, Singapore, pp 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4327-2_6
Mukherjee I, Singh UK (2020) Delineation of groundwater potential zones in a drought-prone semi-arid region of east India using GIS and analytical hierarchical process techniques. Catena 194:104681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104681
Narasimhan B, Bhallamudi M, Mondal A, Ghosh S, Mujumdar P (2016) Chennai Floods 2015: A Rapid Assessment Report. http://www.icwar.iisc.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Chennai-Floods-Rapid-Assessment-Report.pdf
Ouyang NL, Lu SL, Wu BF, Zhu JJ, Wang H (2011) Wetland restoration suitability evaluation at the watershed scale—a case study in upstream of the Yongdinghe River. Procedia Environ Sci 10(Part C):1926–1932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.09.302
Paul M, Negahban-Azar M, Shirmohammadi A, Montas H (2020) Assessment of agricultural land suitability for irrigation with reclaimed water using geospatial multi-criteria decision analysis. Agric Water Manag 231:105987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105987
Periyasamy P, Yagoub MM, Sudalaimuthu M (2018) Flood vulnerable zones in the rural blocks of Thiruvallur district, South India. Geoenviron Disasters 5:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-018-0113-5
Pham BT, Pradhan B, Tien Bui D, Prakash I, Dholakia MB (2016) A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of Uttarakhand area (India). Environ Model Softw 84:240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.005
Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 8(4):365–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
Rajaveni SP, Nair IS, Elango L (2016) Evaluation of impact of climate change on seawater intrusion in a coastal aquifer by finite element modelling. J Clim Change 2:111–118. https://doi.org/10.3233/JCC-160022
Roumeau S, Seifelislam A, Jameson S, Kennedy L, Roumeau S, Seifelislam A, Jameson S, Kennedy L, Governance W, Kennedy L (2015) Water governance and climate change issues in Chennai. pp 1–34
Ruet J, Gambiez M, Lacour E (2007) Private appropriation of resource: impact of peri-urban farmers selling water to Chennai Metropolitan Water Board. Cities 24(2):110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2006.10.001
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill International Book Co.
Saaty TL (2006) There is no mathematical validity for using fuzzy number crunching in the analytic hierarchy process. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 15(4):457–464
Saaty TL, Tran LT (2007) On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Math Comput Model 46(7–8):962–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.022
Saaty TL (2008) Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making: why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors: the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process. Rev Real Acad Cienc Exactas Fis Nat Ser A-Mat 102(2):251–318.
Sarmah T, Das S, Narendr A, Aithal BH (2020) Assessing human vulnerability to urban flood hazard using the analytic hierarchy process and geographic information system. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 50:101659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101659
Saunders W, Becker J (2015) A discussion of resilience and sustainability: land use planning recovery from the Canterbury earthquake sequence, New Zealand. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.013
Sirdaş S, Sen Z (2009) Spatio-temporal drought analysis in the Trakya region, Turkey. Hydrol Sci J 48(5):809–820. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.5.809.51458
Sivakumar VL, Radha Krishnappa R, Nallanathel M (2020) Drought vulnerability assessment and mapping using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) and application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for Namakkal District, Tamilnadu, India. Mater Today Proc 43:1592–1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.657
Srivastava PK, Bhattacharya AK (2006) Groundwater assessment through an integrated approach using remote sensing, GIS and resistivity techniques: a case study from a hard rock terrain. Int J Remote Sens 27(20):4599–4620. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600554983
Sudha Rani NNV, Satyanarayana ANV, Bhaskaran PK (2015) Coastal vulnerability assessment studies over India: a review. Nat Hazards 77(1):405–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1597-x
UNDP (1987) Hydrogeological and artificial recharge studies, Madras, India: technical report. UN, Department of Technical Co-operation for Development, New York
Walker B, Salt D (2012) Resilience practice: building capacity to absorb disturbance and maintain function. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-231-0
Wilson JP, Mitasova H, Wright DJ (2000) Water resource applications of geographic information systems. URISA J 12(2):61–79
World Resources Institute (2015) Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas. https://www.wri.org/data/aqueduct-global-maps-21-data
Zabihi H, Alizadeh M, Wolf ID, Karami M, Ahmad A, Salamian H (2020) A GIS-based fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) for ecotourism suitability decision making: a case study of Babol in Iran. Tourism Manage Perspect 36:100726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100726