Warning: Anti-tobacco activism may be hazardous to epidemiologic science

Carl Phillips1
1University of Alberta School of Public Health, Edmonton, AB T6G 2L9, Canada

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis commentary accompanies two articles submitted to Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations in response to a call for papers about threats to epidemiology or epidemiologists from organized political interests. Contrary to our expectations, we received no submissions that described threats from industry or government; all were about threats from anti-tobacco activists. The two we published, by James E. Enstrom and Michael Siegel, both deal with the issue of environmental tobacco smoke. This commentary adds a third story of attacks on legitimate science by anti-tobacco activists, the author's own experience. These stories suggest a willingness of influential anti-tobacco activists, including academics, to hurt legitimate scientists and turn epidemiology into junk science in order to further their agendas. The willingness of epidemiologists to embrace such anti-scientific influences bodes ill for the field's reputation as a legitimate science.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Siegel M: Is the tobacco control movement misrepresenting the acute cardiovascular health effects of secondhand smoke exposure? An analysis of the scientific evidence and commentary on the implications for tobacco control and public health practice. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2007, 4:12.

Enstrom JE: Defending legitimate epidemiologic research: combating Lysenko pseudoscience. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2007, 4:11.

Phillips CV: Lack of scientific influences on epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2007, in press.

Pearce N: Corporate influences on epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2007, in press.

Siegel M: "The Science Doesn't Matter: All Three Anti-Smoking Groups Fail to Defend or Correct their False Claims About Acute Cardiovascular Effects of ETS". [http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2007_08_01_archive.html] The Rest of the Story (blog, August 27, 2007) (Accessed October 11, 2007)

Siegel M: "TobaccoScam Responds with Attack, But Does Not Address Substance of Criticism of Its Claim that 30 Minutes of Secondhand Smoke Exposure Clogs Arteries". [http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2007_07_01_archive.html] The Rest of the Story (blog, July 11, 2007) (Accessed October 11, 2007)

Siegel M: "New Study Shows McDonalds Meal Causes Same Degree of Endothelial Dysfunction as Brief Tobacco Smoke Exposure; Anti-Smoking Groups' Claims are Flawed". [http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/08/new-study-shows-mcdonalds-meal-causes.html] The Rest of the Story (blog, August 27, 2007) (Accessed October 11, 2007)

Siegel M: The rest of the story: tobacco news analysis and commentary. [http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/]

Phillips CV, et al. [http://TobaccoHarmReduction.org]

Rodu B, Godshall WT: Tobacco harm reduction: an alternative cessation strategy for inveterate smokers. Harm Reduct J 2006, 3:37.

Phillips CV, Rabiu D, Rodu B: Calculating the comparative mortality risk from smokeless tobacco versus smoking. [http://tobaccoharmreduction.org/papers/phillips-comparativerisk-poster-jun06.ppt] Am J Epidemiol 2006, 163:S189.

Phillips CV, Wang C, Guenzel B: You might as well smoke; the misleading and harmful public message about smokeless tobacco. BMC Public Health 2005, 5:31.

Phillips CV, Bergen P, Guenzel B: Persistent misleading health advice about smokeless tobacco on the Web. 11th World Congress on Internet in Medicine: 13–20 Oct. 2006; Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Libin K: Whither the campus radical? National PostA1. 28 Sept. 2007

Henley SJ, Thun MJ, Connell C, Calle EE: Two large prospective studies of mortality among men who use snuff or chewing tobacco (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2005, 16:347–358.

Henley SJ, Connell CJ, Richter P, et al.: Tobacco-related disease mortality among men who switched from cigarettes to spit tobacco. Tob Control 2007, 16:22–28.

Phillips CV: Publication bias in situ. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004, 4:20.