WATER versus WATER II 2-Year Update: Comparing Aquablation Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in 30–80-cm3 and 80–150-cm3 Prostates
Tài liệu tham khảo
Foster, 2019, Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA guideline amendment 2019, J Urol, 202, 592, 10.1097/JU.0000000000000319
Gravas
Welliver, 2016, Minimally invasive and endoscopic management of benign prostatic hyperplasia, 2504
Pariser, 2015, National trends of simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with an analysis of risk factors for adverse perioperative outcomes, Urology, 86, 721, 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.048
Lin, 2016, Transurethral enucleation of the prostate versus transvesical open prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, World J Urol, 34, 1207, 10.1007/s00345-015-1735-9
Kuntz, 2008, Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial, Eur Urol, 53, 160, 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.08.036
Michalak, 2015, HoLEP: the gold standard for the surgical management of BPH in the 21st century, Am J Clin Exp Urol, 3, 36
Valdivieso, 2018, Multicentre international experience of 532-nm laser photoselective vaporization with GreenLight XPS in men with very large prostates, BJU Int, 122, 873, 10.1111/bju.14208
Nguyen, 2020, Operative time comparison of aquablation, GreenLight PVP, ThuLEP, GreenLEP, and HoLEP, World J Urol, 38, 3227, 10.1007/s00345-020-03137-8
Gilling, 2016, Aquablation—image-guided robot-assisted waterjet ablation of the prostate: initial clinical experience, BJU Int, 117, 923, 10.1111/bju.13358
Gilling, 2018, WATER: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of Aquablation vs transurethral resection of the prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia, J Urol, 199, 1252, 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.065
Bach, 2019, Aquablation of the prostate: single-center results of a non-selected, consecutive patient cohort, World J Urol, 37, 1369, 10.1007/s00345-018-2509-y
Bhojani, 2019, Comparison of <100 cc prostates and >100 cc prostates undergoing Aquablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia, World J Urol, 37, 1361, 10.1007/s00345-018-2535-9
Nguyen, 2020, Waterjet Ablation Therapy for Endoscopic Resection of prostate tissue trial (WATER) vs WATER II: comparing Aquablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in 30–80 and 80–150 mL prostates, BJU Int, 125, 112, 10.1111/bju.14917
Gilling, 2019, Two-year outcomes after Aquablation compared to TURP: efficacy and ejaculatory improvements sustained, Adv Ther, 36, 1326, 10.1007/s12325-019-00952-3
Desai, 2020, Aquablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia in large prostates (80–150 cc): 2-year results, Can J Urol, 27, 10147
Meskawi, 2017, Multicenter international experience of 532nm-laser photo-vaporization with Greenlight XPS in men with large prostates (prostate volume & 100 cc), World J Urol, 35, 1603, 10.1007/s00345-017-2007-7
Ghobrial, 2020, A randomized trial comparing bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight laser (xps-180watt) photoselective vaporization of the prostate for treatment of small to moderate benign prostatic obstruction: outcomes after 2 years, BJU Int, 125, 144, 10.1111/bju.14926
Chin, 2012, Prostatic urethral lift: two-year results after treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia, Urology, 79, 5, 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.021
Sievert, 2019, Minimally invasive prostatic urethral lift (PUL) efficacious in TURP candidates: a multicenter German evaluation after 2 years, World J Urol, 37, 1353, 10.1007/s00345-018-2494-1
McVary, 2018, Three-year outcomes of the prospective, randomized controlled Rezūm system study: convective radiofrequency thermal therapy for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia, Urology, 111, 1, 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.023
Wilson, 2006, A randomised trial comparing holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection in the treatment of prostates larger than 40 grams: results at 2 years, Eur Urol, 50, 569, 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.002
Elzayat, 2005, Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a size-independent new “gold standard”, Urology, 66, 108, 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.006
Robert, 2016, Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), BJU Int, 117, 495, 10.1111/bju.13124
Elshal, 2017, Prospective assessment of learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia using a multidimensional approach, J Urol, 197, 1099, 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.001
Du, 2008, Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: the safety, efficacy, and learning experience in China, J Endourol, 22, 1031, 10.1089/end.2007.0262
Peyronnet, 2017, Learning curves and perioperative outcomes after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a comparison between GreenLight 532-nm and holmium lasers, World J Urol, 35, 973, 10.1007/s00345-016-1957-5
Nguyen, 2019, Furthering the external validity of Aquablation and implications for real-world patients, World J Urol, 37, 1983, 10.1007/s00345-018-2610-2
PR Newswire
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health