Voluntary Rehabilitation? On Neurotechnological Behavioural Treatment, Valid Consent and (In)appropriate Offers

Lene Bomann-Larsen1
1Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas/Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature, University of Oslo, PO Box 1020 Blindern, 0315, Oslo, Norway

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Tancredi, Laurence R. 2004. Neuroscience developments and the law. In Neuroscience and the law. Brain, mind and the scales of justice, ed. Brent Garland, 71–113. New York: Dana Press.

Farah, Martha. 2007. Emerging ethical issues in neuroscience. In Defining right and wrong in brain science. Essential readings in neuroethics, ed. Walter Glannon, 19–36. New York: Dana Press.

Levy, Neil. 2007. Neuroethics. Challenges for the 21st century. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Beauchamp, Tom L., and Ruth R. Faden. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.

Feinberg, Joel. 1986. Harm to self. The moral limits of the criminal law. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kant, Immanuel. 1992. Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. In Classics of moral and political theory, ed. Michael L. Morgan, 1044–1115. Indianapolis: Hacknett Pub.

Mill, John Stuart. 1992. On liberty. In Classics of moral and political theory, ed. Michael L. Morgan, 1044–1115. Indianapolis: Hacknett Pub.

Rawls, John. 1991. The idea of an overlapping consensus. In Rawls: Collected papers, ed. Samuel Freeman, 421–448. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Zimmerman, Michael J. 2007. The concept of moral obligation. Cambridge studies in philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rawls, John. 1991. A Kantian conception of equality. In Rawls: Collected papers, ed. Samuel Freeman, 254–266. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Duff, Antony. 2007. Answering for crime. Responsibility and liability in the criminal law. Legal theory today. Oxford: Hart Pub.