Voltage dependence of Ca2+sparks in intact cerebral arteries

American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology - Tập 274 Số 6 - Trang C1755-C1761 - 1998
Jonathan H. Jaggar1, Andrá S. Stevenson1, Mark T. Nelson1
1Department of Pharmacology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405

Tóm tắt

Ca2+ sparks have been previously described in isolated smooth muscle cells. Here we present the first measurements of local Ca2+ transients (“Ca2+ sparks”) in an intact smooth muscle preparation. Ca2+sparks appear to result from the opening of ryanodine-sensitive Ca2+ release (RyR) channels in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). Intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) was measured in intact cerebral arteries (40–150 μm in diameter) from rats, using the fluorescent Ca2+ indicator fluo 3 and a laser scanning confocal microscope. Membrane potential depolarization by elevation of external K+ from 6 to 30 mM increased Ca2+ spark frequency (4.3-fold) and amplitude (∼2-fold) as well as global arterial wall [Ca2+]i(∼1.7-fold). The half time of decay (∼50 ms) was not affected by membrane potential depolarization. Ryanodine (10 μM), which inhibits RyR channels and Ca2+ sparks in isolated cells, and thapsigargin (100 nM), which indirectly inhibits RyR channels by blocking the SR Ca2+-ATPase, completely inhibited Ca2+ sparks in intact cerebral arteries. Diltiazem, an inhibitor of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels, lowered global [Ca2+]iand Ca2+ spark frequency and amplitude in intact cerebral arteries in a concentration-dependent manner. The frequency of Ca2+sparks (<1 s−1 ⋅ cell−1), even under conditions of steady depolarization, was too low to contribute significant amounts of Ca2+ to global Ca2+ in intact arteries. These results provide direct evidence that Ca2+ sparks exist in quiescent smooth muscle cells in intact arteries and that changes of membrane potential that would simulate physiological changes modulate both Ca2+ spark frequency and amplitude in arterial smooth muscle.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1006/bbrc.1996.0808

10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016333

10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021927

10.1038/386759a0

10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015262

10.1152/ajpcell.1997.273.6.C2090

10.1126/science.1373909

10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80677-0

10.1126/science.7754384

10.1126/science.8235594

10.1161/01.RES.67.2.525

10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019409

10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020665

10.1152/ajpcell.1980.239.1.C23

10.1161/01.RES.55.2.197

10.1007/BF00550873

10.1152/physrev.1989.69.2.546

10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06831.x

10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.497bm.x

Knot H. J., 1995, Am. J. Physiol., 269, H348

10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.199br.x

10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.211br.x

10.1126/science.7754383

10.1007/s004240050233

10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021864

10.1126/science.270.5236.633

10.1038/336382a0

10.1152/ajpcell.1998.274.5.C1346

10.1096/fasebj.4.2.2105252

10.1085/jgp.107.4.459

10.1161/01.RES.78.1.166

10.1139/y97-103

10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79831-4

10.1152/ajpcell.1997.272.4.C1151

10.1073/pnas.91.8.3294