Visual plagiarism in interior design: is it easy to recognise?

Donia M. Bettaieb1, Abeer Alawad1, Raif B. Malek2
1Department of Interior Design and Furniture, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2Department of Architecture, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis study aims to remove some of the ambiguities of visual plagiarism in interior design (those related to the visual composition of space represented by line, form, shape, texture, time, colour, light, etc.) by examining the main detection methods, the extent of the issue, and the experiences and roles of academic interior designers. Two main methods were used: an analysis of the primary forms of visual plagiarism and an applied approach to test the effectiveness of plagiarism. Additionally, 30 academics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, who majored in interior design, were surveyed using an online questionnaire. The results demonstrated that changing the light and colour while maintaining the rest of the properties and changing the line, form, and shape are considered visual plagiarism. However, the results also indicated that visual plagiarism is not always clear for academics. It is hoped that the results of this study will increase the awareness of visual plagiarism, enhance ethics in the university environment, and help academic interior designers apply scientific methods to detect plagiarism in design projects. This study can also assist regulatory authorities to manage complaints and disputes in plagiarism cases.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alawad AA, Bettaieb DM, Malek RB (2018) Plagiarism: the main reasons for its widespread use amongst students theoretical framework behind students’ plagiarism. Int J Current Res 10(2):65235–65239 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332275491_PLAGIARISM_THE_MAIN_REASONS_FOR_ITS_WIDESPREAD_USE_AMONGST_STUDENTS_THEORETICAL_FRAMEWORK_BEHIND_STUDENTS%27_PLAGIARISM

Alawad AA, Bettaieb DM, Malek RB (2020) Self-plagiarism in students’ interior design projects from an academic perspective. Int J Manag 11(10):1370–1382 http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/issues.asp?JType=IJM&VType=11&IType=10

Auf A (2014) Abou of Tarek, site analysis 2014. Sky Publisher

Auf A (2015) Abou of Tarek, design concept 2015. Sky Publisher. https://ia903103.us.archive.org/5/items/content_4/content_4.pdf

Bickman L, Rog DJ, Hedrick TE (2009) Applied research design: a practical approach. Handb Appl Soc Res Methods 2:3–43. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n1

Blythman M, Orr S, Mullin J (2007) Reaching a consensus: Plagiarism in non-text-based media. https://cpb-eu-w2.wpmucdn.com/blogs.brighton.ac.uk/dist/7/3977/files/2018/03/Reaching_A_Consensus_Plagiarism_In_Non-T-v0k6k9.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2021

Caplan AL, Redman BK (2018) Plagiarism. In: Caplan AL, Redman BK (eds) Getting to good. Springer, Switzerland, pp 261–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51358-4_7

Cleary MN (2017) Top 10 reasons students plagiarise and what teachers can do about it (with apologies to David Letterman). Phi Delta Kappan 99(4):66–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717745548

Dalal N (2015) Responding to plagiarism using reflective means. Int J Educ Integr 11(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-015-0002-6

Garrett L, Robinson A (2012a) Spot the difference! Visual plagiarism in the visual arts. Br Comput Soc (BCS):24–33 https://core.ac.uk/display/9427953. Accessed 27 May 2021

Garrett L, Robinson A (2012b) Spot the difference! Plagiarism identification in the visual arts. Electron Vis Arts 2012 (EVA 2012):24–33

Gibson JJ (1977) The theory of affordances. In: Shaw R, Bransford J (eds) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 67–82

Gosling SD, Gifford R, McCunn L (2013) The selection, creation, and perception of interior spaces: an environmental psychology approach. In: Brooker G, Weinthal L (eds) The handbook of interior architecture and design. Bloomsbury Academic, London, pp 278–290. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474294096.ch-020

Hedrick TE, Bickman L, Rog DJ (1993) Applied research design: a practical guide. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983457

Hoepner K (2021) What does it mean to plagiarise in the design world? Architectural digest. https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/what-does-it-mean-to-plagiarize-in-the-design-world. Accessed 27 May 2021

Howard RM (2001) Forget about policing plagiarism: just teach. Chronicle 11(16):1–4 https://abacus.bates.edu/cbb/events/docs/Howard_ForgeT.pdf

Hurtík P, Hodáková P (2015) FTIP: a tool for an image plagiarism detection. In: 7th international conference of soft computing and pattern recognition (SoCPaR). IEEE, pp 42–47

Kilmer R, Kilmer WO (1992) Designing interiors. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning

Nussbaumer LL (2013) Human factors in the built environment. Bloomsbury Academic, London

Park C (2003) In other (people’s) words: plagiarism by university students-literature and lessons. Assess Eval High Educ 28(5):471–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301677

Ryerson University (n.d.) Best practices: Preventing visual plagiarism. https://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/academicintegrity/for-faculty/educational-tools/VisualPlagiarism.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2021

Simon S (2016) Academic integrity in non-text-based disciplines. In: Bretag T (ed) Handbook of academic integrity. Springer, Singapore, pp 763–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_61

Starovoytova D, Namango SS (2016) Viewpoint of undergraduate engineering students on plagiarism. J Educ Prac 7(31):48–65 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1122526.pdf

Van Heerden L (2014) Detecting internet visual plagiarism in higher education photography with Google™ search by image: proposed upload methods and aspect evaluation. Central University of Technology, Free State, Dissertation

Walker B (2009) New twists on an old problem: preventing plagiarism and enforcing academic integrity in an art and design school. Art Doc J Art Libr 28(1):48–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/adx.28.1.27949510