Visual Arguments in Film

Aristotle. 1991. Poetics. In The complete works of Aristotle, ed. J. Barnes, 2316–2340. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Austin, J.L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Birdsell, D.S., and L. Groarke. 1996. Towards a theory of visual argument. Argument and Advocacy 33: 1–10.

Black, M. 1972. How do pictures represent? In Art, perception, and reality, ed. M. Mandelbaum, 95–130. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Blair, J.A. 1996. The possibility and actuality of visual arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy 33: 23–29.

Bordwell, D., and K. Thompson. 2004. Film art: An introduction, 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Buckland, W. 1995. Relevance and cognition: Towards a pragmatics of unreliable filmic narration. In Towards a pragmatics of the audiovisual, vol. 2, ed. J.E. Müller, 55–66. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.

Burke, K. 1969. A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley, CA: University California Press.

Dreyer, C.T. 1991. A little on film style. In Dreyer in double reflection, ed. D. Skoller, 122–142. New York: Da Capo Press.

Eisenstein, S.M. 1947. The film sense. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Eisenstein, S.M. 1992. A dialectic approach to film form. In Film theory and criticism, ed. G. Mast, M. Cohen, and L. Braudy, 138–154. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gombrich, E.H. 1998. Arte e ilusión [Art and illusion]. Madrid: Debate.

Gorgias of Leontini. 2003. The encomium of helen. In The Greek sophists, ed. J. Dillion and T. Gergel, 76–84. London: Penguin.

Gregory, R.L. 1998. Eye and brain. The psychology of seeing, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Groarke, L. 1996. Logic, art and argument. Informal Logic 18: 105–129.

Groarke, L. 2002. Towards a pragma-dialectics of visual argument. In Advances in pragma-dialectics, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 137–151. Amsterdam: International Centre for the Study of Argumentation.

Groarke, L. 2007. Four theses on Toulmin and visual argument. In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference ISSA, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, C.A. Willard, and B. Garssen, 535–540. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

Johnson, R.H. 2003. Why “visual arguments” aren’t arguments. In: IL@25. A Conference Celebrating the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the First International Symposium on Informal Logic. http://web2.uwindsor.ca/faculty/arts/philosophy/ILat25/edited_johnson.doc .

Kracauer, S. 1997. Theory of film. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

McBride, J. 2004. Tras la pista de John Ford [Searching for John Ford: A Life]. Madrid: T & B Editores.

O’Keefe, D.J. 1982. The concepts of argument and arguing. In Advances in argumentation theory and research, ed. J.R. Cox, and C.A. Willard, 3–23. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Perelman, Ch. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. (trans: Wilkinson, J. and P. Weaver). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Popper, K.R. 1972. Objective knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Slade, C. 2003. Seeing reasons: Visual argumentation in advertisements. Argumentation 17: 145–160.

Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Tarnay, L. 2003. The conceptual basis of visual argumentation. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference ISSA, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, C.A. Willard, and A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, 1001–1005. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

Tindale, C.W. 1999. Acts of arguing: A rhetorical model of argument. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Tindale, C.W. 2004. Rhetorical argumentation: Principles of theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

van Eemeren, F.H. and P. Houtlosser. 2000. Rhetoric in Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation, Interpretation, Rhetoric, 1. www.argumentation.spb.ru/2000_1/index.htm .

van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.