Virtuous reality: moral theory and research into cyber-bullying
Tóm tắt
This article draws on a study investigating how 11–14 year olds growing up in England understand cyber-bullying as a moral concern. Three prominent moral theories: deontology, utilitarianism and virtue ethics, informed the development of a semi-structured interview schedule which enabled young people, in their own words, to describe their experiences of online and offline bullying. Sixty 11–14 year olds from six schools across England were involved with the research. Themes emerging from the interviews included anonymity; the absence of rules, monitoring and guidance and, the challenges associated with determining the consequences of online actions. The findings demonstrate the advantages of adopting a character-based moral theory to compliment rules and/or consequence based moral theories as the basis for future research into cyber-bullying. The findings evoke some wider implications for future research into cyber-bullying that might equally be applied to investigations into other Internet related moral concerns.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ackers, M. (2012). Cyberbullying: Through the eyes of children and young people. Educational Psychology in Practice, 28(2), 141–157.
Ali, A. (2013). Cyber-bullying taxonomies: Definition, forms, consequences and mitigation strategies. In 2013 5th International conference on computer science and information technology (CSIT) (p. 126–133).
Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 41(4), 387–397.
Anirban, S., & Anoshua, C. (2011). Are social networking sites a source of online harassment for teens? Evidence from survey data. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 284–290.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1–19.
Arsenio, W., Adams, E., & Gold, J. (2009). Social information processing, moral reasoning and emotion attributions. Relations with adolescents reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 80, 1739–1755.
Arthur, J., Kristjansson, K., Thomas, H., Kotzee, B., Ignatowitcz, A., & Qiu, I. (2015). Virtuous medical practice. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Accessed July 20, 2015 from http://www.jubileecentre.ac.uk/userfiles/jubileecentre/pdf/Research%20Reports/Virtuous_Medical_Practice.pdf.
Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119.
Belsey, B. (2005). Internet usage: Facts and news. Accessed September 17, 2012 from www.cyberbullying.ca.
BERA. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: BERA.
Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Brydolf, C. (2007). Minding myspace: Balancing the benefits and risks of students’ online social networks. Education Digest, 73(2), 4–8.
Campbell, M. (2005). Cyber-bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 15(1), 68–76.
Couldry, N. (2010). Media ethics: Towards a framework for media producers and media consumers. In S. J. Eards & H. Wasserman (Eds.), Media ethics beyond boarders: A global perspective. New York: Routledge.
Cross, D., Li, Q., Smith, P. K., & Monks, H. (2012). Understanding and preventing cyberbullying. Where have we been and where should we be going? In Q. Li, D. Cross, & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the global playground. Research from international perspectives (pp. 287–305). West Sussex: Wiley.
Cross, E., Richardson, B., Thaddaeus, D., & Jessica, V. (2009). Protecting young people from cyberbullying. London: Beatbullying.
Elder, A. (2014). Excellent online friendships: An Aristotelian defense of social media. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(16), 287–297.
Froese-Germain, B. (2008). Bullying gets digital shot-in-the-arm. Education Canada, 48(4), 44–47.
Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behaviour, 32, 528–539.
Granitz, N., & Loewy, D. (2007). Applying ethical theories: Interpreting and responding to student plagiarism. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 293–306.
Harrison, T. (2014). The influence of the Internet on the character virtues of 11–14 year olds. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
Hasebrink, U., Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., & Olafsson, K. (2009). Comparing children’s online opportunities and risks across Europe: Cross-national comparisons for EU Kids Online (2nd ed.). Deliverable D3.2, LSE, London, EU Kids Online. Accessed June 17, 2014 from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/24368/1/D3.2_Report-Cross_national_comparisons-2nd-edition.pdf.
Heary, C., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The use of focus group interviews in paediatric health care research. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27(1), 47–57.
Heath, S., Brooks, R., Cleaver, E., & Ireland, E. (2009). Researching Young people’s lives. London: Sage.
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horner, S. D. (2000). Focus on research methods: Using focus group methods with middle school children. Research in Nursing & Health, 23(6), 510–517.
Krueger, R. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Layard, R., & Dunn, J. (2009). A good childhood, searching for values in a competitive age. London: Penguin.
Lenhart, A. (2007). Cyberbullying. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Accessed November 20, 2013 from www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Cyberbullying.aspx.
Lievens, E. (2011). Risk-reducing regulatory strategies for protecting minors in social networks. Strategy for Telecommunications, Information and Media, 13(6), 43–54.
Livingston, S. (2009). Children and the Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lyu, H. (2012). Internet policy in Korea: A preliminary framework for assigning moral and legal responsibility to agents in Internet activities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 394–402.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Malti, T., Gasser, L., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2010). Children’s interpretive understanding, moral judgments, and emotion attributions: Relations to social behaviour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 275–292.
McFall, M. T. (2012). Real character-friends: Aristotelian friendship, living together, and technology. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(3), 221–230.
Menesini, E., & Camodeca, M. (2008). Shame and guilt as behaviour regulators: Relationships with bullying, victimization and prosocial behaviour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 183–196.
Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Calussi, P. (2011). The measurement of cyberbullying: Dimensional structure and relative item severity and discrimination. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking, 14(5), 267–274.
Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Camodeca, M. (2013). Morality, values, traditional bullying, and cyberbullying in adolescence. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 1–14.
Mishnan, F., Cook, C., Gadalla, T., Daciuk, J., & Solomon, S. (2010). Cyber-bullying behaviours among middle and high school students. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(3), 362–374.
Mishnan, F., Michael, S., & Solomon, S. (2009). Ongoing and online: Children and youth’s perceptions of cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 3(12), 1222–1228.
Ofcom. (2014). Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. Accessed July 10, 2015 from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/media-use-attitudes-14/Childrens_2014_Report.pdf.
Perren, S., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 195–209.
Plaisance, P. (2013). Virtue ethics and digital flourishing: An application of Philippa foot to life online. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 28(3), 91–102.
Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815–827.
Robson, C. (2011). Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Shariff, S. (2008). Cyber-bullying: Issues and solutions for the school the classroom and the home. Oxon: Routledge.
Shariff, S., & Hoff, D. L. (2007). Cyberbullying: Clarifying legal boundaries for school supervision in cyberspace. International Journal of Cyber Criminology. http://www.cybercrimjournal.co.nr. Accessed 12 Oct 2013.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behaviour, 7(3), 321–326.
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimisation. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26(3), 277–287.
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J. S., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychology Behavior, 9, 584–590.
Vallor, S. (2010). Social networking technology and the virtues. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(2), 157–170.
Weisband, S., & Kiesler, S. (1996). Self-disclosure on computer forms: Meta-analysis and implications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3–10).
Willard, N. (2002). Computer ethics, etiquette, and safety for the 21st-century student. Eugene, OR: ISTE.
Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limitations of philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Winter, R. E., & Leneway, R. J. (2008). Cyberbullying—Terror in the classroom: What can be done? Accessed January 15, 2013 from http://www.chaminade.org/cyberbullying.htm.
Zhang, X. (2010). Charging children with child pornography—Using the legal system to handle the problem of sexting. Computer Law & Security Review, 26(3), 251–259.