Virtual colonoscopy: effect of computer-assisted detection (CAD) on radiographer performance
Tài liệu tham khảo
Burling, 2004, CT colonography practice in the UK: a national survey, Clin Radiol, 59, 39, 10.1016/j.crad.2003.09.008
Halligan
Johnson CD. Review of clinical studies. The National CT Colonography Trial ACRIN 6664. In: Sixth International Symposium Virtual Colonoscopy. Boston, MA, October 17–18, 2005, p. 49–51.
Taylor SA. Current and on-going validation. European Trials. In: Seventh International Symposium Virtual Colonoscopy. Boston, MA, October 16–18, 2006, p. 49–53.
Culpan, 2002, Double contrast barium enema sensitivity: a comparison of studies by radiographers and radiologists, Clin Radiol, 57, 604, 10.1053/crad.2002.0952
Brown, 2002, Cost-effectiveness of barium enemas performed by radiographers, Clin Radiol, 57, 129, 10.1053/crad.2001.0831
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology CT colonography Group Investigators, 2007, Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multi-center study, Radiology, 242, 152, 10.1148/radiol.2421051000
Halligan, 2006, Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection, Gastroenterology, 131, 1690, 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.09.051
Pickhardt, 2003, Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults, N Engl J Med, 349, 2191, 10.1056/NEJMoa031618
Taylor, 2006, Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 186, 696, 10.2214/AJR.04.1990
Burling, 2004, Computerized tomography colonography, Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 4, 615, 10.1586/14737140.4.4.615
Winawer, 2000, A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group, N Engl J Med, 342, 1766, 10.1056/NEJM200006153422401
Halligan, 2005, CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum dataset for study level reporting, Radiology, 237, 893, 10.1148/radiol.2373050176
Soto, 2005, Reader training in CT colonography: how much is enough?, Radiology, 237, 26, 10.1148/radiol.2371050003
Taylor, 2004, CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance, Eur Radiol, 14, 1025, 10.1007/s00330-004-2262-z
Taylor, 2007, European society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography, Eur Radiol, 17, 575, 10.1007/s00330-006-0407-y
Bodily, 2005, Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography, Acad Radiol, 12, 67, 10.1016/j.acra.2004.10.055
Burling, 2007, CT colonography: Interpretative performance in a non academic environment, Clin Radiol, 62, 424, 10.1016/j.crad.2006.11.004
