Virtual colonoscopy: effect of computer-assisted detection (CAD) on radiographer performance

Clinical Radiology - Tập 63 - Trang 549-556 - 2008
D. Burling1, A. Moore1, M. Marshall1, J. Weldon1, C. Gillen1, R. Baldwin1, K. Smith1, P. Pickhardt1, L. Honeyfield1, S. Taylor1
1St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Burling, 2004, CT colonography practice in the UK: a national survey, Clin Radiol, 59, 39, 10.1016/j.crad.2003.09.008 Halligan Johnson CD. Review of clinical studies. The National CT Colonography Trial ACRIN 6664. In: Sixth International Symposium Virtual Colonoscopy. Boston, MA, October 17–18, 2005, p. 49–51. Taylor SA. Current and on-going validation. European Trials. In: Seventh International Symposium Virtual Colonoscopy. Boston, MA, October 16–18, 2006, p. 49–53. Culpan, 2002, Double contrast barium enema sensitivity: a comparison of studies by radiographers and radiologists, Clin Radiol, 57, 604, 10.1053/crad.2002.0952 Brown, 2002, Cost-effectiveness of barium enemas performed by radiographers, Clin Radiol, 57, 129, 10.1053/crad.2001.0831 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology CT colonography Group Investigators, 2007, Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multi-center study, Radiology, 242, 152, 10.1148/radiol.2421051000 Halligan, 2006, Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection, Gastroenterology, 131, 1690, 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.09.051 Pickhardt, 2003, Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults, N Engl J Med, 349, 2191, 10.1056/NEJMoa031618 Taylor, 2006, Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 186, 696, 10.2214/AJR.04.1990 Burling, 2004, Computerized tomography colonography, Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 4, 615, 10.1586/14737140.4.4.615 Winawer, 2000, A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group, N Engl J Med, 342, 1766, 10.1056/NEJM200006153422401 Halligan, 2005, CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum dataset for study level reporting, Radiology, 237, 893, 10.1148/radiol.2373050176 Soto, 2005, Reader training in CT colonography: how much is enough?, Radiology, 237, 26, 10.1148/radiol.2371050003 Taylor, 2004, CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance, Eur Radiol, 14, 1025, 10.1007/s00330-004-2262-z Taylor, 2007, European society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography, Eur Radiol, 17, 575, 10.1007/s00330-006-0407-y Bodily, 2005, Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography, Acad Radiol, 12, 67, 10.1016/j.acra.2004.10.055 Burling, 2007, CT colonography: Interpretative performance in a non academic environment, Clin Radiol, 62, 424, 10.1016/j.crad.2006.11.004