Violations of Independence under Amendment and Plurality Rules with Anonymous Voters

Arrow KJ (1951). Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York

Favardin P and Lepelley D (2006). Some further results on the manipulabilty of social choice rules. Soc Choice Welfare 26: 485–509

Gehrlein WV and Fishburn PC (1976a). The probability of the paradox of voting: a computable solution. J Econ Theory 13: 14–25

Gehrlein WV and Fishburn PC (1976b). Condorcet’s paradox and anonymous preference profiles. Public Choice 26: 1–18

Gehrlein WV (2006) Condorcet’s paradox. Springer-Verlag

Lepelley D and Mbih B (1987). The proportion of coalitionally unstable situations under the plurality rule. Econ Lett 24: 311–315

Lepelley D and Mbih B (1994). The vulnerability of four social choices functions to coalitional manipulation of preferences. Soc Choice Welfare 11: 253–265

Lepelley D and Mbih B (1997). Strategic manipulation in committees using the plurality rule: alternative concepts and frequency calculations. Group Decis Negotiat 6: 119–138

Regenwetter M, Grofman B, Marley AAJ and Tselin IM (2006). Behavioral social choice: probabilistic models, statistical inference, and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Saari DG (2001). Decisions and elections: explaining the unexpected. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge