Video Recording Practices and the Reflexive Constitution of the Interactional Order: Some Systematic Uses of the Split-Screen Technique

Auer, P. (2002). Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Interaction and Linguistic Structures, 33, 39.

Ball, M. (2000). The visual availability and local organization of public surveillance systems: The promotion of social order in public space. Sociological Research Online, 5(1) ( www.socresonline.org.uk ).

Bavelas, J., Gerwing, J., Sutton, C., & Prevost, D. (2008). Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 495–520.

Broth, M. (2004). The production of a live TV-interview through mediated interaction. In C. van Dijkum, J. Blasius, H. Kleijer, B. van Hilten (Eds.), Recent developments and applications in social research methodology (Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Logic and Methodology, August 17–20, 2004, Amsterdam). Amsterdam: SISWO ( http://www2.fmg.uva.nl/emca/RC33Broth.pdf ).

Broth, M. (2008). The studio interaction as a contextual resource for TV-production. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(5), 904–926.

Buscher, M. (2005). Social life under the microscope? Sociological Research Online, 10 (1) ( http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/1/1.html ).

Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 131–158.

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.

Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25(2), 237–274.

Goodwin, C. (2000). Practices of seeing, visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of Visual Analysis (pp. 157–182). London: Sage.

Heath, C., et al. (2002). Configuring awareness. CSCW, 11(3–4), 317–347.

Heritage, H. (2002). The limits of questioning: negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1427–1446.

Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (Eds.). (1997). Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington: University Press of America.

Koschmann, T., Le Baron, C., Goodwin, C., Zemel, A., & Dunnington, G. (2007). Formulating the triangle of doom. Gesture, 7(1), 97–118.

Laurier, E., & Philo, C. (2006). Natural problems of naturalistic video data. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video-analysis methodology and methods (pp. 183–192). Bern: Lang.

Laurier, E., Strebel, I., Brown, B. (2008). Video analysis: Lessons from professional video editing practice. FQS (Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research), 9 (3) ( www.qualitative-research.net/ ).

Lomax, H., & Casey, N. (1998). Recording social life: Reflexivity and video methodology. Sociological Research Online, 3(2) ( www.socresonline.org.uk ).

Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Lynch, M. (1988). The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. Human Studies, 11, 201–234.

Lynch, M. (2006). Cognitive activities without cognition? Ethnomethodological investigations of selected ‘cognitive’ topics. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 95–104.

Macbeth, D. (1999). Glances, trances, and their relevance for a visual sociology. In P. L. Jalbert (Ed.), Media studies: Ethnomethodological approaches (pp. 135–170). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Mondada, L. (2003). Working with video: How surgeons produce video records of their actions. Visual Studies, 18(1), 58–72.

Mondada, L. (2005). Visions controversées de la carte: Construire le visible par les gestes et la parole en interaction. In C. D’Alessandro, et al. (Eds.), Espaces, savoirs et incertitudes (pp. 15–31). Paris: Belin.

Mondada, L. (2006). Video recording as the reflexive preservation-configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, et al. (Eds.), Video analysis (pp. 51–68). Bern: Lang.

Mondada, L. (2007a). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 195–226.

Mondada, L. (2007b). Transcript variations and the indexicality of transcribing practices. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 809–821.

Mondada, L. (2007c). Operating together through videoconference: Members’ procedures for accomplishing a common space of action. In S. Hester & D. Francis (Eds.), Orders of ordinary action (pp. 51–67). Aldershot: Ashgate.

Mondada, L. (2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics (in press).

Perakyla, A., & Ruusuvuori, A. (2006). Facial expression in an assessment. In H. J. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video-analysis: Methodology and methods (pp. 127–142). Bern: Lang.

Relieu, M. (1999). La réalisation et la réception du produit télévisuel comme accomplissements. In J.-P. Desgoutte (Ed.), La mise en scène du discours audiovisuel (pp. 35–65). Paris: L’Harmattan.

Sacks, H. (1972a). Notes on police assessment of moral character. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 280–293). New York: Free Press.

Sacks, H. (1972b). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational materials for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31–74). New York: Free Press.

Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2). Oxford: Blackwell.

Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to tersons and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York: Irvington.

Schegloff, E. A. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?” Sociological Inquiry, 50, 104–152.

Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: a partial sketch of a systematics. In B. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 437–485). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

vom Lehn, D., Heath, C., & Hindmarsh, J. (2001). Exhibiting interaction: Conduct and collaboration in museums and galleries. Symbolic Interaction, 24, 89–216.

Whalen, M., & Whalen, J. (2004). Studying workspaces. In P. LeVine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 208–229). Georgetown University Press: Washington.

Zimmerman, D. H., & Pollner, M. (1971). The everyday world as a phenomenon. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 80–104). Chicago: Aldine.