Verb disposition in argument structure alternations: a corpus study of the dative alternation in Dutch

Arnold, 2000, Heaviness vs. newness: the effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering, Language, 76, 28, 10.2307/417392 Bresnan, J., Nikitina, T., in press. The gradience of the dative alternation. In: Uyechi, L., Wee, L.H. (Eds.), Reality Exploration and Discovery: Pattern Interaction in Language and Life. CSLI Publications, Stanford. Bresnan, 2007, Predicting the dative alternation, 69 Colleman, T., 2006. De Nederlandse datiefalternantie: een constructioneel en corpusgebaseerd onderzoek. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Ghent University. Colleman, T., De Clerck, B., in press. Accounting for ditransitives with envy and forgive. Functions of Language 15(2). Collins, 1995, The indirect object construction in English: an informational approach, Linguistics, 33, 35, 10.1515/ling.1995.33.1.35 De Schutter, G., 1974. De Nederlandse zin: Poging tot beschrijving van zijn structuur. De Tempel, Brugge. De Schutter, 1993, Towards a cognitive analysis of the NP-PP variation in the indirect object in Dutch, Leuvense Bijdragen, 82, 485 Dik, 1997, The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the Clause Duinhoven, 2003, Actieve en passieve indirect objecten. Een kwestie van analyse en synthese, Nederlandse taalkunde, 8, 199 Erteschik-Shir, 1979, Discourse constraints on dative movement, vol. 12, 441 Fillmore, 1977, The case for case reopened, vol. 8, 59 Fillmore, 1977, Topics in Lexical semantics, 76 Goldberg, 1992, The inherent semantics of argument structure: the case of the English ditransitive, Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 37, 10.1515/cogl.1992.3.1.37 Goldberg, 1995 Green, 1974 Gries, 2003, Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 1, 10.1075/arcl.1.02gri Gries, S., 2004. Coll.analysis 3, R-script for collostructional analysis. Gries, 2007, New perspectives on old alternations, vol. II, 274 Gries, 2004, Extending collostructional analysis: a corpus-based perspective on “alternations, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 97, 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri Gries, 2005, Converging evidence: bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions, Cognitive Linguistics, 16, 635, 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.635 Grondelaers, 2000, Het CONDIV-corpus geschreven Nederlands, Nederlandse Taalkunde, 5, 356 Gropen, 1989, The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English, Language, 65, 203, 10.2307/415332 Harley, H., 2007. The bipartite structure of verbs cross-linguistically, or Why Mary can’t exhibit John her paintings. Presentation at the 2007 ABRALIN Congres in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, March 2007. <http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000435>. Janssen, 1997, Giving in Dutch: an intra-lexematical and inter-lexematical description, 267 Kay, 2005, Argument structure constructions and the argument-adjunct distinction, 71 Krifka, 2004, Semantic and pragmatic conditions for the Dative Alternation, Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 4, 1 Langacker, 1991 Leino, 2005, Constructions and variability, 191 Levin, 1993 Manning, 2003, Probabilistic syntax, 289 Melinger, 2005, Lexically-driven syntactic priming, Cognition, 20, 1 Newman, 1996, 10.1515/9783110823714 Noël, 2003, Is there semantics in all syntax? The case of accusative and infinitive constructions vs. that-clauses, 347 Oehrle, R.T., 1976. The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Unpublished. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT. Panther, 1997, Dative alternation from a cognitive perspective, 107 Pinker, 1989 Schermer-Vermeer, 2001, Grammatica, lexicon en de dubbelobject-constructie in het Nederlands en het Engels, Nederlandse Taalkunde, 6, 22 Stallings, 1998, Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: phrase length and verb disposition in heavy-NP shift, Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 392, 10.1006/jmla.1998.2586 Stefanowitsch, 2006, Negative evidence and the raw frequency fallacy, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2, 61, 10.1515/CLLT.2006.003 Stefanowitsch, 2003, Collostructions: investigating the interaction of words and constructions, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, 209, 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste Stefanowitsch, 2005, Co-varying collexemes, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1, 1, 10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.1 Taylor, 2002 Tobback, E., 2006. Les constructions à attribut de l’objet et le marquage de la prédication Seconde, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Ghent University. Van Belle, 1996, The indirect object in Dutch, vol. 1, 217 Van der Beek, L., 2005. Topics in corpus-based Dutch syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Groningen. Van Langendonck, 2000, Semantic role configurations and syntactic patterns of the Dutch indirect object, 79 Van Valin, 1997 Verspoor, M., 1990. Semantic criteria in English complement selection. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Leiden. Wierzbicka, 1986, The semantics of ‘internal dative’ in English, Quaderni di Semantica, 7, 121 Wierzbicka, 1988 Willems, 2000, L’attribut de l’objet et les verbes de perception, Langue Française, 127, 6, 10.3406/lfr.2000.995