Ventilation rates indicate stress-coping styles in Nile tilapia
Tóm tắt
Behavioural responses to stress can form distinct profiles in a wide range of animals: proactive and reactive profiles or coping styles. Stress responsiveness can also differentiate between the behavioural profiles. The tendency to regain feed intake following transfer to a novel social-isolation tank (the speed of acclimation) can discriminate between proactive or reactive profiles. Consequently, differential stress responsiveness can be linked to this feeding behaviour trait. This study shows that ventilation rates of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.), correlate with the rate of feeding resumption, following transfer to a novel social-isolation aquarium. Therefore, ventilation rate (VR) indicates coping styles; consequently, VR is a proxy for the way fish will deal with environmental challenges.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alvarenga CMD and Volpato GL 1995 Agonistic profile and metabolism in alevins of the Nile tilapia. Physiol. Behav. 57 75–80
Barreto RE, Luchiari AC and Marcondes AL 2003a Ventilatory frequency indicates visual recognition of an allopatric predator in naïve Nile tilapia. Behav. Process. 60 235–239
Barreto RE, Moreira PSA and Carvalho RF 2003b Sex-specific compensatory growth in food-deprived Nile tilápia. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 36 477–483
Barreto RE and Volpato GL 2004 Caution for using ventilatory frequency as an indicator of stress in fish. Behav. Process. 66 43–51
Barreto RE, Gontijo AMDC and Delicio HC 2008 Correlations between pre- and post-fasting growth in Nile tilapia. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 34 113–116
Barreto RE, Volpato GL, Faturi CD, Giaquinto PC, de Freitas EG and de Castilho MF 2009 Aggressive behaviour traits predict physiological stress responses in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Mar. Freshwater Behav. Physiol. 42 109–118
Barreto RE, Barbosa A, Giassi ACC and Hoffmann A 2010 The ‘club’ cell and behavioural and physiological responses to chemical alarm cues in the Nile tilapia. Mar. Freshwater Behav. Physiol. 43 75–81
Bell AM, Henderson L and Huntingford FA 2010 Behavioral and respiratory responses to stressors in multiple populations of three-spined sticklebacks that differ in predation pressure. J. Comp. Physiol. B – Biochem. Sys. Environ. Physiol. 180 211–220
Brown C, Gardner C and Braithwaite VA 2005 Differential stress responses in fish from areas of high- and low-predation pressure. J. Comp. Physiol. B - Biochemic. Syst. Environ. Physiol. 175 305–312
Campos VF, Collares T, Deschamps JC, Seixas FK, Dellagostin OA, Lanes CFC, Sandrini J, Marins LF, et al. 2010 Identification, tissue distribution and evaluation of brain neuropeptide Y gene expression in the Brazilian flounder Paralichthys orbignyanus. J. Biosci. 35 405–413
Careau V, Thomas D, Humphries MM and Reale D 2008 Energy metabolism and animal personality. Oikos 117 641–653
Carere C and van Oers K 2004 Shy and bold great tits (Parus major): body temperature and breath rate in response to handling stress. Physiol. Behav. 82 905–912
Froese R 2006 Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 22 241–253
Fucikova E, Drent PJ, Smits N and van Oers K 2009 Handling Stress as a Measurement of Personality in Great Tit Nestlings (Parus major). Ethology 115 366–374
Gibson AK and Mathis A 2006 Opercular beat rate for rainbow darters Etheostoma caeruleam exposed to chemical stimuli from conspecific and heterospecific. J. Fish Biol. 69 224–232
Hawkins LA, Armstrong JD and Magurran AE 2004 Predator-induced hyperventilation in wild and hatchery Atlantic salmon fry. J. Fish Biol. 65 (Suppl. A) 88–100
Hawkins LA, Magurran AE, Armstrong JD 2007 Innate abilities to distinguish between predator species and cue concentration in Atlantic salmon Anim. Behav. 73 1051–1057
Koolhaas JM, Korte SM, De Boer SF, Van Der Vegt BJ, Van Reenen CG, Hopster H, De Jong IC, Ruis MAW and Blokhuis HJ 1999 Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 23 925–935
Mommsen TP, Vijayan MM and Moon TW 1999 Cortisol in teleosts: dynamics, mechanisms of action, and metabolic regulation. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 9 211–268
Øverli Ø, Korzan WJ, Hoglund E, Winberg S, Bollig H, Watt M, Forster GL, Barton BA, Øverli E, Renner KJ and Summers CH 2004 Stress coping style predicts aggression and social dominance in rainbow trout. Horm. Behav. 45 235–241
Øverli Ø, Sorensen C and Nilsson GE 2006 Behavioral indicators of stress-coping style in rainbow trout: Do males and females react differently to novelty? Physiol. Behav. 87 506–512
Øverli Ø, Sorensen C, Pulman KGT, Pottinger TG, Korzan W, Summers CH and Nilsson GE 2007 Evolutionary background for stress-coping styles: Relationships between physiological, behavioral, and cognitive traits in non-mammalian vertebrates. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 31 396–412
Pottinger TG and Carrick TR 2001 Stress responsiveness affects dominant-subordinate relationships in rainbow trout. Horm. Behav. 40 419–427
Priede IG 1985 Metabolic scope in fishes; in Fish energetics: new perspectives (eds) P Tytler and P Calow (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press) pp 33–64
Queiroz H and Magurran AE 2005 Safety in numbers? Shoaling behaviour of the Amazonian red-bellied piranha. Biol. Lett. 1 155–157
Schjolden J, Backstrom T, Pulman KGT, Pottinger TG and Winberg S 2005a Divergence in behavioural responses to stress in two strains of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with contrasting stress responsiveness. Horm. Behav. 48 537–544
Schjolden J, Stoskhus A and Winberg S 2005b Does individual variation in stress responses and agonistic behavior reflect divergent stress coping strategies in juvenile rainbow trout? Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 78 715–723
Schmidt-Nielsen K 2002 Animal physiology: Adaptations and environment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) p 611
Silva PIM, Martins CIM, Engrola S, Marino G, Øverli Ø and Conceição LEC 2010 Individual differences in cortisol levels and behaviour of Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) juveniles: Evidence for coping styles. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 124 75–81