Variations in experience in obtaining local ethical approval for participation in a multi‐centre study

QJM - Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians - Tập 96 Số 4 - Trang 305-307 - 2003
Nick Maskell1, E. E. C. Jones2, Robert J.O. Davies2
1Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, John Radcliffe NHS Trust, Headington, Oxford, UK.
2From the Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, John Radcliffe NHS Trust, Oxford, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

NHS Executive. Interim Guidance: How Should an LREC Handle an MREC Approved Application? Ref Type: Report. London, Department of Health, 1998.

Alberti KG. Local research ethics committees. Br Med J1995; 311:639–40.

Gilbert C, Fulford KW, Parker C. Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees. Br Med J1989; 299:1437–9.

Middle C, Johnson A, Petty T, Sims L, MacFarlane A. Ethics approval for a national postal survey: recent experience. Br Med J1995; 311:659–60.

Hotopf M, Wessely S, Noah N. Are ethical committees reliable? J R Soc Med1995; 88:31–3.

Lux AL, Edwards SW, Osborne JP. Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee. Br Med J2000; 320:1182–3.

Harries UJ, Fentem PH, Tuxworth W, Hoinville GW. Local research ethics committees. Widely differing responses to a national survey protocol. J R Coll Physicians Lond1994; 28:150–4.

Larcombe I, Mott M. Multicentre research ethics committees: have they helped? J R Soc Med1999; 92:500–1.