Variation and uncertainty buffering: a grocery supply case

Supply Chain Management - Tập 17 Số 6 - Trang 655-665 - 2012
RoyStratton1
1Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe key constructs and causal relationships underpinning supply chain dynamics have long been established but this understanding is not readily related to more recently developed supply chain models and theory. The purpose of this paper is to use a case to investigate how selected constructs (variation, uncertainty, performance trade‐offs and buffering mechanisms) may be used to show the dominant causal relationships and through that enhance the theoretical explanation of such models.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses a single case study that was selected because the transition in supply chain management strategy clearly questioned the need for improved causal reasoning. The case research sources include interviews, temporal performance data and multiple site visits across three echelons of the supply chain.FindingsThe cause and effect logic underpinning the case transition have been explained and mapped using these constructs which have then been used to propose enhancements to the Fisher supply chain strategy model in generalising theoretical guidance.Practical implicationsThese constructs, together with the generic strategies, provide additional clarity concerning generic options for strategic improvement as well as causal understanding of the buffering implications.Originality/valueThis paper uses a case study to enhance current theory by exploring means of better supporting theoretical prediction and explanation.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bruce, M., Daly, L. and Towers, N. (2004), “Lean or agile: a solution for supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry?”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 151‐70.

Burbidge, J.L. (1978), The Principles of Production Control, Macdonald and Evans, Plymouth.

Burbidge, J.L. (1985), “Production planning and control: a personal philosophy”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 6 No. 6, pp. 477‐87.

Christopher, M. and Towill, R.D. (2000), “Supply chain migration from lean and functional to agile and customized”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 206‐13.

Christopher, M., Peck, H. and Towill, D. (2006), “A taxonomy for selecting global supply chain strategies”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 277‐87.

Cressey, D.R. (1953), Other People's Money: A Study of the Social Psychology of Embezzlement, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.

Disney, S.M. and Towill, D.R. (2003), “Vendor managed inventory and bullwhip reduction in a two level supply chain”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 625‐51.

Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532‐50.

Eisenhardt, K.M. (1991), “Better stories and better constructs: the case for rigor and comparative logic”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 620‐7.

Ellram, L.M. (1996), “The use of the case study method in logistics research”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 93‐138.

Feitzinger, E. and Lee, H.L. (1997), “Mass customization at Hewlett‐Packard: the power of postponement”, Harvard Business Review, January‐February, pp. 116‐21.

Fisher, M.L. (1997), “What is the right supply chain for your product?”, Harvard Business Review, March‐April, pp. 105‐16.

Fisher, M.L., Hammond, J.H. and Obermeyer, W.R. (1994), “Making supply meet demand in an uncertain world”, Harvard Business Review, May‐June, pp. 83‐93.

Fisher, M.L., Raman, A. and McClelland, A.S. (2000), “Rocket science retailing is almost here: are you ready?”, Harvard Business Review, July‐August, pp. 115‐24.

Fisher, M.L., Hammond, J., Obermeyer, W. and Raman, A. (1997), “Configuring a supply chain to reduce the cost of demand uncertainty”, Production and Operations Management, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 211‐25.

Forrester, J. (1961), Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Fransoo, J.C., Wouter, M.J.F. and De Kof, T.G. (2001), “Multi‐echelon multi company inventory planning with limited information exchange”, Journal of Operations Research Society, Vol. 52, pp. 830‐8.

Fuller, J.B., O'Conner, J. and Rawlinson, R. (1993), “Tailored logistics: the next advantage”, Harvard Business Review, May‐June, pp. 87‐98.

Gilbert, D. and Jackson, N. (2002), “The efficacy of sales promotions in the UK supermarkets: a consumer view”, International of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 315‐22.

Harris, G.A., Componation, P.J. and Farrington, P. (2010), “An exploration of Fisher's framework for the alignment of supply chain strategy with product characteristics”, Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 31‐42.

Hill, T. (1985), Manufacturing Strategy, Macmillan Education, London.

Hopp, W.J. and Spearman, M.L. (1995), Factory Physics, McGraw Hill, Singapore.

Hopp, W.J. and Spearman, M.L. (2000), Factory Physics, 2nd ed., McGraw Hill, Singapore.

Houlihan, J.B. (1987), “International supply chain management”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials Management, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 51‐66.

Kaipia, R., Korhonen, H. and Hartiala, H. (2006), “Planning nervousness in a demand supply network: an empirical study”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 95‐113.

Lee, H.L. (2002), “Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties”, California Management Review, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 105‐19.

Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V. and Seungjin, W. (1997a), “The bullwhip effect in supply chains”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 93‐102.

Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V. and Seungjin, W. (1997b), “Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect”, Management Science, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 543‐58.

Lee, H.L., So, K.C. and Tang, C.S. (2000), “The value of information sharing in a two level supply chain”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 5, pp. 626‐43.

Melnyk, S.A. and Handfield, R.B. (1998), “May you live in interesting times…the emergence of theory‐driven empirical research”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 16, pp. 311‐9.

Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed., Sage, London.

Narasimhan, R., Swink, M. and Soo, W.K. (2006), “Disentangling leanness from agility: an empirical investigation”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 24, pp. 440‐57.

Naslund, D. (2002), “Logistics needs qualitative research – especially action research”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 321‐38.

Naylor, J.B., Naim, M. and Berry, D. (1999), “Leagility: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 62, pp. 107‐18.

Ohno, T. (1988), The Toyota Production System; Beyond Large‐scale Production, Productivity Press, Portland, OR.

Olhager, J. (2003), “Strategic positioning of the order penetration point”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 85 No. 3, pp. 319‐29.

Sabath, R. (1998), “Volatile demand calls for quick response”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 28 Nos 9/10, pp. 698‐704.

Selldin, E. and Olhager, J. (2007), “Linking products with supply chains: testing Fisher's model”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 42‐51.

Seuring, S.A. (2008), “Assessing the rigor of case study research in supply chain management”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 128‐37.

Shingo, S. (1989), A Study of the Toyota Production System from an Industrial Engineering Viewpoint, Productivity Press, Portland, OR.

Simpson, D. and Power, D. (2005), “Use the supply relationship to develop lean and green suppliers”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 60‐8.

Skinner, W. (1969), “Manufacturing‐missing link in corporate strategy”, Harvard Business Review, May‐June, pp. 136‐45.

Skinner, W. (1974), “The focused factory”, Harvard Business Review, May‐June, pp. 113‐21.

Stalk, G. and Hoult, T.M. (1990), Competing against Time: How Time‐based Completion Is Reshaping Global Markets, The Free Press, New York, NY.

Stevens, G.C. (1989), “Integrating the supply chain”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 19 No. 8, pp. 3‐8.

Sun, S.‐Y., Hsu, M.‐H. and Hwang, W.‐J. (2009), “The impact of alignment between supply chain strategies and environmental uncertainty on SCM performance”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 201‐12.

Taylor, D.H. and Fearne, A. (2009), “Demand management in fresh food value chains: a framework for analysis and improvement”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 379‐92.

Van Hoek, R.I. (2001), “The rediscovery of postponement a literature review and direction for research”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 161‐84.

Voss, C., Nikos, T. and Frohlich, M. (2002), “Case research in operations management”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 195‐219.

Walker, M.A., Dabholkar, P.A. and Gentry, J.J. (2000), “Postponement, product customisation and market orientated supply chain management”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 133‐59.

Womack, J.P. and Jones, D.T. (1996), Lean Thinking ‐ Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.

Yang, B., Burns, N. and Blackhouse, C.J. (2004), “Postponement: a review and an integrated framework”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management., Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 468‐87.

Yin, R.K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, London.

Zinn, W. and Bowersox, D.J. (1988), “Planning physical distribution with the principle of postponement”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 117‐36.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Supply Chain Management

Tập 17 Số 6

655-665

Thông tin tác giả