Valuing type and scope of ecosystem conservation: A meta-analysis

Adamowicz, 1998, Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 80, 64, 10.2307/3180269 Arrow, 1993, Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, Fed. Regist., 58, 4601 Barrio, 2010, A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1023, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.016 Bateman, 2003, Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values, Land Econ., 79, 235, 10.2307/3146869 Baum, 2006 Benayas, 2009, Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis, Science, 325, 1121, 10.1126/science.1172460 Bergstrom, 2006, Using meta-analysis for benefits transfer: theory and practice, Ecol. Econ., 60, 351, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.015 Brouwer, 1999, A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies, Reg. Environ. Change, 1, 47, 10.1007/s101130050007 Bulte, 1999, Marginal valuation of charismatic species: implications for conservation, Environ. Resour. Econ., 14, 119, 10.1023/A:1008309816658 Cameron, 2009, vol. 77845 Caparros, 2008, Would you choose your preferred option? Comparing choice and recoded ranking experiments, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 90, 843, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01137.x Carson, 1997, Contingent valuation surveys and tests of insensitivity to scope, 127 Carson, 1993, The value of clean water: the public's willing-ness to pay for boatable, fishable and swimmable quality water, Water Resour. Res., 29, 2445, 10.1029/93WR00495 Christie, 2006, Valuing the diversity of biodiversity, Ecol. Econ., 58, 304, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.034 Czajkowski, 2009, Valuing changes in forest biodiversity, Ecol. Econ., 68, 2910, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.016 Farber, 2000, Valuing watershed quality improvements using conjoint analysis, Ecol. Econ., 34, 63, 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00153-1 Garber-Yonts, 2004, Public values for biodiversity conservation policies in the Oregon coast range, For. Sci., 50, 589 Garrod, 1997, The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: a contingent ranking study, Ecol. Econ., 21, 45, 10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00092-4 Glass, 1976, Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research, Educ. Res., 10, 3, 10.3102/0013189X005010003 Gujarati, 1992, 10020 Hagen, 1992, Benefits of preserving old-growth forests and the spotted owl, Contemp. Policy Issues, X, 13, 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1992.tb00221.x Hailu, 2000, Complements, substitutes, budget constraints and valuation, Environ. Resour. Econ., 16, 51, 10.1023/A:1008328920083 Hanley, 1998, Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland, J. Agric. Econ., 49, 1, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01248.x Hanley, 2006, Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive, J. Environ. Manage., 78, 183, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.05.001 Hjerpe, 2009, Socioeconomic barriers and the role of biomass utilization in southwestern ponderosa pine restoration, Ecol. Restor., 27, 169, 10.3368/er.27.2.169 Holmes, 2004, Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits, and the scale of riparian ecosystem restoration, Ecol. Econ., 49, 19, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.015 Johnston, 2003, Modeling relationship between use and nonuse values for surface water quality: a meta-analysis, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1, 10.1029/2003WR002649 Johnston, 2005, Systematic variation in willingness to pay for aquatic resource improvements and implications for benefit transfer: a meta-analysis, Can. J. Agric. Econ., 53, 221, 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.04018.x Kahneman, 1992, Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 22, 57, 10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-S Katz, 1992, The big lie: human restoration of nature, Res. Philos. Technol., 12, 231 Kramer, 2004, Using contingent valuation to estimate the value of forest ecosystem protection, 303 Latinopoulos, 2010, Valuing the services of coastal ecosystems: a meta-analysis of contingent valuation studies, J. Sustain. Dev. Plan., 5, 13, 10.2495/SDP-V5-N1-13-30 Lehtonen, 2003, Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland, Environ. Policy Sci., 6, 195, 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00035-2 Lindhjem, 2007, 20 years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: a meta-analysis, J. For. Econ., 12, 251 Loomis, 1987, Balancing public trust resources of Mono lake and Los Angeles’ water right: an economic approach, Water Resour. Res., 23, 1449, 10.1029/WR023i008p01449 Loomis, 1996, Measuring the economic benefits of removing dams and restoring the Elwha river: results of a contingent valuation survey, Water Resour. Res., 32, 441, 10.1029/95WR03243 Loomis, 1996, Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis, Ecol. Econ., 18, 197, 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00029-8 Loomis, 2000, Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey, Ecol. Econ., 33, 103, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00131-7 Macmillan, 2001, Modelling the non-market environmental costs and benefits of biodiversity projects using contingent valuation data, Environ. Resour. Econ., 18, 391, 10.1023/A:1011169413639 McFadden, 1997 Meyerhoff, 2009, Benefits of biodiversity enhancement of nature-oriented silviculture: evidence from two choice experiments, J. For. Econ., 15, 37 Mirer, 1994 Montgomery, 2002, Ranking the benefits of biodiversity: an exploration of relative values, J. Environ. Manage., 65, 313, 10.1006/jema.2002.0553 Morrison, 2002, Choice modeling and tests of benefit transfer, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 84, 161, 10.1111/1467-8276.00250 Mueller, 2013, Estimating the value of watershed services following forest restoration, Water Resour. Res., 49, 1773, 10.1002/wrcr.20163 Nelson, 2009, The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and natural resource economics: an assessment, Environ. Resour. Econ., 42, 345, 10.1007/s10640-008-9253-5 O’Brien, 2007, A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors, Qual. Quant., 41, 673L 690, 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6 Ojea, 2011, Identifying the scope effect on a meta-analysis of biodiversity valuation studies, Resour. Energy Econ., 33, 706, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.03.002 Ovaskainen, 2005, Consumer versus citizen preferences in contingent valuation: evidence on the role of question framing, Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 49, 379, 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2005.00309.x Pagiola, 2004 Ready, 2006, International benefit transfer: methods and validity tests, Ecol. Econ., 60, 429, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.008 Rosenberger, 2000, Using meta-analysis for benefit transfer: in-sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database, Water Resour. Res., 36, 1097, 10.1029/2000WR900006 Rosenberger, 2001 Rosenberger, 2006, Measurement, generalization, and publication: sources of error in benefit transfers and their management, Ecol. Econ., 60, 372, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.018 Siikamaki, 2007, Discrete choice survey experiments: a comparison using flexible methods, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 53, 122, 10.1016/j.jeem.2006.04.003 Smith, 1996, Do contingent valuation estimates pass a scope test? A meta-analysis, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 31, 287, 10.1006/jeem.1996.0045 Smith, 2002, Is meta-analysis a Noah's ark for non-market valuation?, Environ. Resour. Econ., 22, 271, 10.1023/A:1015567316109 Stanley, 1989, Meta-regression analysis: a quantitative method of literature surveys, J. Econ. Surv., 3, 161, 10.1111/j.1467-6419.1989.tb00064.x Stevens, 1997, Sensitivity of contingent valuation to alternative payment schedules, Land Econ., 73, 140, 10.2307/3147083 Stewart, 2005 Thaler, 1980, Toward a positive theory of consumer choice, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 1, 39, 10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 Van Houtven, 2007, Valuing water quality improvements in the United States using meta-analysis: is the glass half-full or half-empty for national policy analysis?, Resour. Energy Econ., 29, 206, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.01.002 Veisten, 2004, Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities, J. Environ. Manage., 73, 317, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.07.008 Weber, 2009, Public values for river restoration options on the Middle Rio Grande, Restor. Ecol., 17, 762, 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00407.x Wilson, 1999, Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971–1997, Ecol. Appl., 9, 772 Wilson, 2010, A benefit-cost analysis of establishing protected natural areas in New Brunswick, Canada, For. Policy Econ., 12, 94, 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.005 Woodward, 2001, The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis, Ecol. Econ., 37, 257, 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00276-7