Values shift in response to social learning through deliberation about protected areas

Allmendinger, 2012, Post-political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus?, Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 37, 89, 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00468.x Andrade, R., Johnson, D., Salcido, E., Goodson, D., Rowe, G., Colianni, R., Johnson, E., Craver, A., Keller, R., Stewart, W., van Riper, C.J., 2020. ENVISION Fact Sheet: Building a place-based understanding of social-ecological dynamics and their consequences for landscape change in the Denali region of Interior Alaska. 10.5281/zenodo.4352166. Armitage, 2011, Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic, Glob. Environ. Chang., 21, 995, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006 Baird, 2014, Learning effects of interactive decision-making processes for climate change adaptation, Glob. Environ. Chang., 27, 51, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.019 Bandura, 1971 Bentley Brymer, 2018, Analyzing stakeholders’ workshop dialogue for evidence of social learning, Ecol. Soc., 23, 10.5751/ES-09959-230142 Blacksher, 2012, What is public deliberation, Hastings Cent. Rep., 42, 14, 10.1002/hast.26 Bloomfield, 2001, Deliberation and inclusion: vehicles for increasing trust in UK public governance?, Eviron. Plann. C. Gov. Policy, 19, 501, 10.1068/c6s Braito, 2017, Human-nature relationships and linkages to environmental behaviour, Environ. Values, 26, 365, 10.3197/096327117X14913285800706 Brown, 1984, The concept of value in resource allocation, Land Econ., 60, 231, 10.2307/3146184 Brown, 2000, Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning, For. Sci., 46, 240 Browning, 2020, Can simulated nature support mental health? Comparing short, single-doses of 360-degree nature videos in virtual reality with the outdoors, Front. Psychol., 2667 Brüggen, 2009, A critical comparison of offline focus groups, online focus groups and e-Delphi, Int. J. Mark. Res., 51, 1, 10.1177/147078530905100301 Cerveny, 2017, Mapping meaningful places on Washington’s Olympic Peninsula: toward a deeper understanding of landscape values, Environ. Manag., 60, 643, 10.1007/s00267-017-0900-x Charmaz, 2014 Clark, 2020, Sustainability science: Toward a synthesis, Annu. Rev. Env. Resour., 45, 331, 10.1146/annurev-environ-012420-043621 Collins, 2009, Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation, Environ. Policy Gov., 19, 358, 10.1002/eet.523 Crona, 2006, What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management, Ecol. Soc., 11, 10.5751/ES-01793-110207 Cummings, 2005, Communities of practice and networks: Reviewing two perspectives on social learning, Knowl. Manag. Dev. J., 1, 8 Cundill, 2012, A review of assertions about the processes and outcomes of social learning in natural resource management, J. Environ. Manage., 113, 7, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.021 de Kraker, 2017, Social learning for resilience in social–ecological systems, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 28, 100, 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.09.002 Diduck, 2020, Pathways of learning about biodiversity and sustainability in private urban gardens, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 63, 1056, 10.1080/09640568.2019.1633288 Dietz, 2013, Bringing values and deliberation to science communication, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 14081, 10.1073/pnas.1212740110 Eriksson, 2019, Social learning as a link between the individual and the collective: Evaluating deliberation on social values, Sustain. Sci., 14, 1323, 10.1007/s11625-019-00725-5 Ernst, 2019, Review of factors influencing social learning within participatory environmental governance, Ecol. Soc., 24, 10.5751/ES-10599-240103 Farrow, 2018, Less is more in energy conservation and efficiency messaging, Energy Policy, 122, 1, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.007 Fernández-Giménez, 2019, Complexity fosters learning in collaborative adaptive management, Ecol. Soc., 24, 10.5751/ES-10963-240229 Fielding, 2006, Access grid nodes in field research, Sociol. Res. Online, 11, 13, 10.5153/sro.1385 Frymier, 1999, The revised learning indicators scale, Commun. Stud., 50, 1, 10.1080/10510979909388466 Garmendia, 2010, Public participation for sustainability and social learning: concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1712, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.027 Gavin, 2018, Effective biodiversity conservation requires dynamic, pluralistic, partnership-based approaches, Sustainability, 10, 1846, 10.3390/su10061846 Genoe, 2016, Blogging into retirement: Using qualitative online research methods to understand leisure among baby boomers, J. Leis. Res., 48, 15, 10.18666/jlr-2016-v48-i1-6257 Gerlak, 2018, Learning our way out of environmental policy problems: A review of the scholarship, Policy Sci., 51, 335, 10.1007/s11077-017-9278-0 Goodson, 2022, Perceived inclusivity and trust in protected area management decisions among stakeholders in Alaska, People and Nature, 4, 758, 10.1002/pan3.10312 Hassan, 2013, Groupthink principles and fundamentals in organizations, Interdisciplinary J. Contemporary Res. Business, 5, 225 Haug, 2011, Learning through games? Evaluating the learning effect of a policy exercise on European climate policy, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 78, 968, 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.12.001 Hessler, 2003, Qualitative research on adolescent risk using e-mail: a methodological assessment, Qual. Sociol., 26, 111, 10.1023/A:1021460205328 Irvine, 2016, Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values, Ecosyst. Serv., 21, 184, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.001 Ives, 2017, The self-sabotage of conservation: reply to Manfredo et al., Conserv. Biol., 31, 1483, 10.1111/cobi.13025 Jepson, 2003, Values-led conservation, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 12, 271, 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00019.x Jiggins, 2007, The organisation of social learning in response to perceptions of crisis in the water sector of The Netherlands, Environ. Sci. Policy, 10, 526, 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.12.006 Johannessen, 2013, Social learning towards a more adaptive paradigm? Reducing flood risk in Kristianstad municipality, Sweden, Global Environ. Change, 23, 372, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.009 Johnson, 2019, Comparing the social values of ecosystem services in US and Australian marine protected areas, Ecosyst. Serv., 37, 100919, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100919 Johnson, 2022, Elucidating social-ecological perceptions of a protected area system in Interior Alaska: a fuzzy cognitive mapping approach, Ecol. Soc., 27, 10.5751/ES-13424-270334 Kendal, 2019, Understanding pathways to shifting people’s values over time in the context of social–ecological systems, Sustain. Sci., 14, 1333, 10.1007/s11625-018-0648-0 Kenter, 2016, Shared, plural and cultural values, Ecosyst. Serv., 21, 175, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.010 Kenter, 2015, What are shared and social values of ecosystems?, Ecol. Econ., 111, 86, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006 Kenter, 2016, The deliberative value formation model, Ecosyst. Serv., 21, 194, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.015 Kenter, 2016, Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions, Ecosyst. Serv., 21, 358, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.006 Kenter, 2019, Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability, Sustain. Sci., 14, 1439, 10.1007/s11625-019-00726-4 Knapp, 2014, Parks, people, and change: the importance of multistakeholder engagement in adaptation planning for conserved areas, Ecol. Soc., 19, 10.5751/ES-06906-190416 Lefcheck, 2016, piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics, Methods Ecol. Evol., 7, 573, 10.1111/2041-210X.12512 Lina, I., Kenter, J., Wetterstrand, H., Katzeff, C., in press. What does value pluralism mean in practice? An empirical demonstration from a deliberative valuation. People and Nature. Lliso, 2020, Increasing the credibility and salience of valuation through deliberation: Lessons from the Global South, Glob. Environ. Chang., 62, 102065, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102065 Lo, 2022, How stable are visions for protected area management?, People and Nature, 4, 445, 10.1002/pan3.10292 López-Rodríguez, 2019, Social learning for facilitating dialogue and understanding of the ecosystem services approach: Lessons from a cross-border experience in the Alboran Marine Basin, Sustainability, 11, 5239, 10.3390/su11195239 Mace, 2014, Whose conservation?, Science, 345, 1558, 10.1126/science.1254704 Man, 2014, Luring the lurkers: Increasing participations in the online discussions of a blended learning course, Int. J. E-Learning Practices (IJELP) Manfredo, 2017, Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation, Conserv. Biol., 31, 772, 10.1111/cobi.12855 Matulis, 2017, Beyond inclusive conservation: The value of pluralism, the need for agonism, and the case for social instrumentalism, Conserv. Lett., 10, 279, 10.1111/conl.12281 McDougall, 2013, Does adaptive collaborative forest governance affect poverty? Participatory action research in Nepal’s community forests, Soc. Nat. Resour., 26, 1235, 10.1080/08941920.2013.779344 Meho, 2006, E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: a methodological discussion, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 57, 1284, 10.1002/asi.20416 Muro, 2008, A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 51, 325, 10.1080/09640560801977190 Nakagawa, 2013, A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models, Methods Ecol. Evol., 4, 133, 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x Orchard-Webb, 2016, Deliberative democratic monetary valuation to implement the ecosystem approach, Ecosyst. Serv., 21, 308, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.005 Pahl-Wostl, 2004, Processes of social learning in integrated resources management, J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol., 14, 193, 10.1002/casp.774 Peterson, 2005, Conservation and the myth of consensus, Conserv. Biol., 19, 762, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00518.x Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., R Core Team (2020). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-148. QSR International Pty Ltd. (2018) NVivo (Version 11 Plus), https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home. R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/. Raymond, 2016, Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services, Ecosyst. Serv., 21, 241, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.018 Raymond, 2019, Editorial overview: theoretical traditions in social values for sustainability, Sustain. Sci., 14, 1173, 10.1007/s11625-019-00723-7 Raymond, 2022, Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects, One Earth, 5, 252, 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008 Raymond, 2019, Positive psychology perspectives on social values and their application to intentionally delivered sustainability interventions, Sustain. Sci., 14, 1381, 10.1007/s11625-019-00705-9 Reed, 2010, What is social learning?, Ecol. Soc., 15, 10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01 Reeskens, 2021, Stability or change of public opinion and values during the coronavirus crisis? Exploring Dutch longitudinal panel data, European Societies, 23, S153, 10.1080/14616696.2020.1821075 Rist, 2007, Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali, J. Rural. Stud., 23, 23, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.02.006 Ryff, 2008, Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being, J. Happiness Stud., 9, 13, 10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0 Sampson, 2009, Making place: Identity construction and community formation through “sense of place” in Westland, New Zealand, Society and Natural Resources, 22, 901, 10.1080/08941920802178172 Schmidt, 2007, Technical considerations when implementing online research, The Oxford handbook of Internet Psychology, 461 Schneider, 2009, Social learning processes in Swiss soil protection—the ‘from farmer-to farmer’project, Hum. Ecol., 37, 475, 10.1007/s10745-009-9262-1 Scholz, 2014, An analytical framework of social learning facilitated by participatory methods, Syst. Pract. Action Res., 27, 575, 10.1007/s11213-013-9310-z Schroeder, H. (2013). Sensing value in place. In Place-Based Conservation (pp. 73-87). Springer, Dordrecht. Schultz, 2018, Learning to live with social-ecological complexity: An interpretive analysis of learning in 11 UNESCO Biosphere Reserves, Glob. Environ. Chang., 50, 75, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.001 Schusler, 2003, Social learning for collaborative natural resource management, Soc. Nat. Resour., 16, 309, 10.1080/08941920390178874 Schwartz, 1994, Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?, J. Soc. Issues, 50, 19, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x Selin, 2007, Social learning and building trust through a participatory design for natural resource planning, J. For., 105, 421 Shin, 2022, The value of eudaimonia for understanding relationships among values and pro-environmental behavior, J. Environ. Psychol., 80, 101778, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101778 Siddiki, 2017, Diversity, trust, and social learning in collaborative governance, Public Adm. Rev., 77, 863, 10.1111/puar.12800 Slater, 2020, Social learning and transdisciplinary co-production: a social practice approach, Sustainability, 12, 7511, 10.3390/su12187511 Spotswood, 2021, Nature inequity and higher COVID-19 case rates in less-green neighbourhoods in the United States, Nat. Sustainability, 4, 1092, 10.1038/s41893-021-00781-9 Stern, 2021, Opening learning spaces to create actionable knowledge for conservation, Conservation Science and Practice, 3, e378, 10.1111/csp2.378 Stern, 1999, A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism, Hum. Ecol. Rev., 81 Subirats, 1995, Policy instruments, public deliberation and evaluation processes, 143 Suškevičs, 2018, Learning for social-ecological change: a qualitative review of outcomes across empirical literature in natural resource management, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 61, 1085, 10.1080/09640568.2017.1339594 Tallis, 2014, Working together: A call for inclusive conservation, Nature, 515, 27, 10.1038/515027a Tam, 2021, Measuring behavioral social learning in a conservation context: Chilean fishing communities, Conserv. Sci. Practice, 3, e336, 10.1111/csp2.336 Tran, 2019, Integrating farmers’ adaptive knowledge into flood management and adaptation policies in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta: A social learning perspective, Glob. Environ. Chang., 55, 84, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.004 van den Born, 2018, The missing pillar: Eudemonic values in the justification of nature conservation, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 61, 841, 10.1080/09640568.2017.1342612 Van Riper, 2017, Incorporating sociocultural phenomena into ecosystem-service valuation: the importance of critical pluralism, BioScience, 67, 233, 10.1093/biosci/biw170 van Riper, 2018, Incorporating multilevel values into the social-ecological systems framework, Ecol. Soc., 23, 10.5751/ES-10047-230325 van Riper, 2019, Integrating multi-level values and pro-environmental behavior in a US protected area, Sustain. Sci., 14, 1395, 10.1007/s11625-019-00677-w Whalen, 2018, Sensitivity to shared information in social learning, Cognit. Sci., 42, 168, 10.1111/cogs.12485 Winkler-Schor, 2020, Determining the role of eudaimonic values in conservation behavior, Conserv. Biol., 34, 1404, 10.1111/cobi.13622