Value relevance and timeliness of transitional goodwill-impairment losses: Evidence from Canada

Aboody, 2004, SFAS No. 123 stock-based compensation expense and equity market values, The Accounting Review, 79, 251, 10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.251 Agrawal, 2005, Corporate governance and accounting scandals, Journal of Law and Economics, 48, 371, 10.1086/430808 AICPA, 1971 André, 2000, Business combinations and value creation, Gestion — Revue Internationale de Gestion, 25, 158 Ball, 2000, The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 1, 10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00012-4 Balsam, S., Bartov, E., Haw, I. & Lilien, S. (2000). Differential market responses to alternative implementation methods of accounting changes. Working Paper: Temple University, New York University, Texas Christian University and City University of New York. Barth, 1996, Value relevance of banks' fair value disclosures under SFAS no. 107, The Accounting Review, 71, 513 Barth, 2001, The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 77, 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2 Bear Sterns, 2001, 275 Beatty, 2006, Accounting discretion in fair value estimates: An examination of SFAS 142 goodwill impairments, Journal of Accounting Research, 44, 257, 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00200.x Bedard, 2004, The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management, Auditing, 23, 13, 10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.13 Bens, D. & Heltzer, W. (2004). The information content and timeliness of fair value accounting: an examination of goodwill write-offs before, during and after implementation of SFAS 142. Working Paper: University of Chicago. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, 2002, Section no. 3062: Goodwill and other intangible assets Chen, C., Kohlbeck, M. & Warfield, T. (2004). Goodwill valuation effects of the initial adoption of SFAS 142. Working Paper: University of Wisconsin-Madison. Ciesielski, 2004, International convergence: A game of inches, The Analyst's Accounting Observer, 13, 1 Clarkson, 2004, The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies, The Accounting Review, 79, 329, 10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.329 Collins, 1999, Equity valuation and negative earnings: The role of book value of equity, The Accounting Review, 74, 29, 10.2308/accr.1999.74.1.29 Dechow, 1996, Economic consequences of accounting for stock based compensation, Journal of Accounting Research, 34, 1, 10.2307/2491422 Eldridge, 2004, Comments on exposure-draft on accounting changes and error corrections, 1 Espahbodi, 1995, Equity price reaction to the pronouncements related to accounting for income taxes, The Accounting Review, 70, 655 Espahbodi, 2002, Stock price reaction and value relevance of recognition versus disclosure: The case of stock-based compensation, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 343, 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00048-4 FASB, 2001 FASB, 2005 Feldman, 2002 Fort, 1997, Analysts' forecast accuracy and the presentation of a mandated accounting change, Journal of Applied Business Research, 13, 93, 10.19030/jabr.v13i4.5744 Francis, 1996, Causes and effects of discretionary asset write-offs, Journal of Accounting Research, 34, 117, 10.2307/2491429 Gujarathi, 1992, Evidence of earnings management by the early adopters of SFAS 96, Accounting Horizons, 6, 18 Hayn, 1995, The information content of losses, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20, 125, 10.1016/0165-4101(95)00397-2 Henning, 2000, Valuation of the components of purchased goodwill, Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 375, 10.2307/2672938 Herz, 2001, Equity valuation models and measuring goodwill impairment, Accounting Horizons, 15, 161, 10.2308/acch.2001.15.2.161 Hirst, 2004, Response to FASB exposure draft: Accounting changes and error correction, Accounting Horizons, 18, 255, 10.2308/acch.2004.18.4.255 Jennings, 1996, The relation between accounting goodwill numbers and equity values, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 23, 513, 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1996.tb01024.x Karleff, 2003 King, R. (2002). Goodwill: How low do you dare to go? Asset write-downs could affect future growth prospects, experts warn. The Net Economy. Klein, 2002, Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 375, 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00059-9 Marquardt, 2007, Economic consequences of financial reporting changes: The case of contingent convertible securities, Review of Accounting Studies, 12, 487, 10.1007/s11142-007-9040-5 Massoud, 2003, Accounting for goodwill: Are we better off?, Review of Business, 24, 26 Segal, B. (2003). Goodwill write-downs and the adoption of SFAS No. 142. Ph.D. Dissertation: New York University. Warfield, 1992, Accounting recognition and the relevance of earnings as an explanatory variable for returns, The Accounting Review, 67, 821 Xie, 2003, Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee, Journal of Corporate Finance, 9, 295, 10.1016/S0929-1199(02)00006-8 Zang, Y. (2003). Discretionary behavior with respect to the adoption of SFAS 142 and the behavior of security prices. Ph.D. Dissertation: University of California, Berkeley.