Value of Transvalvular Flow Rate during Exercise in Asymptomatic Patients with Aortic Stenosis

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography - Tập 33 - Trang 438-448 - 2020
Kensuke Hirasawa1, Masaki Izumo2, Kengo Suzuki2, Tomomi Suzuki2, Hiroshi Ohara3, Mika Watanabe2, Yukio Sato2, Ryo Kamijima2, Sachihiko Nobuoka4, Yoshihiro J. Akashi2
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
3Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
4Department of Laboratory Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan

Tài liệu tham khảo

Iung, 2003, A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease, Eur Heart J, 24, 1231, 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00201-X Nkomo, 2006, Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study, Lancet, 368, 1005, 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8 Stewart, 1997, Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study, J Am Coll Cardiol, 29, 630, 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00563-3 Lindroos, 1993, Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample, J Am Coll Cardiol, 21, 1220, 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90249-Z Vahanian, 2012, Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), Eur Heart J, 33, 2451, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109 Nishimura, 2014, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Circulation, 129, 2440, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000029 Lancellotti, 2005, Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis, Circulation, 112, I377, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.523274 Maréchaux, 2010, Usefulness of exercise-stress echocardiography for risk stratification of true asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis, Eur Heart J, 31, 1390, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq076 Lancellotti, 2012, Determinants and prognostic significance of exercise pulmonary hypertension in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis, Circulation, 126, 851, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.088427 Lancellotti, 2017, The clinical use of stress echocardiography in non-ischaemic heart disease: recommendations from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 30, 101, 10.1016/j.echo.2016.10.016 Goublaire, 2018, Prognostic value of exercise-stress echocardiography in asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 11, 787, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.03.020 Saeed, 2017, Lower transaortic flow rate is associated with increased mortality in aortic valve stenosis, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 10, 912, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.008 Vamvakidou, 2019, Low transvalvular flow rate predicts mortality in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis following aortic valve intervention, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 12, 1715, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.011 Blais, 2006, Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study, Circulation, 113, 711, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.557678 Burwash, 1994, Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis, Circulation, 89, 827, 10.1161/01.CIR.89.2.827 Chahal, 2015, Resting aortic valve area at normal transaortic flow rate reflects true valve area in suspected low-gradient severe aortic stenosis, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 8, 1133, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.04.021 Mitchell, 2019, Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 32, 1, 10.1016/j.echo.2018.06.004 Briand, 2005, Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: Implications for diagnosis and treatment, J Am Coll Cardiol, 46, 291, 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.081 Hachicha, 2007, Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival, Circulation, 115, 2856, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681 Huded, 2018, Outcomes in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction undergoing rest and treadmill stress echocardiography, J Am Heart Assoc, 7, e007880, 10.1161/JAHA.117.007880 Masri, 2016, Predictors of long-term outcomes in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular systolic function undergoing exercise echocardiography, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 9, e004689, 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.004689 Meimoun, 2017, Noninvasive coronary flow reserve predicts response to exercise in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 30, 736, 10.1016/j.echo.2017.04.005 Yamashita, 2015, Prognostic value of paradoxical low-gradient severe aortic stenosis in Japan: Japanese Multicenter Aortic Stenosis Study, Retrospective (JUST-R) Registry, J Cardiol, 65, 360, 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.12.019 Kataoka, 2018, Prognostic impact of low-flow severe aortic stenosis in small-body patients undergoing TAVR: the OCEAN-TAVI registry, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 11, 659, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.12.028 Leong, 2016, Factors associated with low flow in aortic valve stenosis, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 29, 158, 10.1016/j.echo.2015.10.007 Lee, 2011, Deterioration of myocardial function in paradoxical low-flow severe aortic stenosis: two-dimensional strain analysis, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 24, 976, 10.1016/j.echo.2011.05.003 Herrmann, 2015, Differences in natural history of low- and high-gradient aortic stenosis from nonsevere to severe stage of the disease, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 28, 1270, 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.016 Hermansen, 1970, Cardiac output during submaximal and maximal treadmill and bicycle exercise, J Appl Physiol, 29, 82, 10.1152/jappl.1970.29.1.82 Hambrecht, 1992, Greater diagnostic sensitivity of treadmill versus cycle exercise testing of asymptomatic men with coronary artery disease, Am J Cardiol, 70, 141, 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91265-6 Maréchaux, 2007, Left ventricular response to exercise in aortic stenosis: an exercise echocardiographic study, Echocardiography, 24, 955, 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00501.x Dayan, 2015, Outcome and impact of aortic valve replacement in patients with preserved LVEF and low-gradient aortic stenosis, J Am Coll Cardiol, 66, 2594, 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.076 Magne, 2015, Prognosis importance of low flow in aortic stenosis with preserved LVEF, Heart, 101, 781, 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306953 Pibarot, 2012, Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, J Am Coll Cardiol, 60, 1845, 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.051 Clavel, 2016, Low-gradient aortic stenosis, Eur Heart J, 37, 2645, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw096 Dumesnil, 2010, Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment, Eur Heart J, 31, 281, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp361 Eleid, 2013, Systemic hypertension in low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction, Circulation, 128, 1349, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003071 Bache, 1973, Left ventricular ejection time in valvular aortic stenosis, Circulation, 47, 527, 10.1161/01.CIR.47.3.527 Pérez Del Villar, 2017, The functional significance of paradoxical low-gradient aortic valve stenosis: hemodynamic findings during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 10, 29, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.03.018