Value migration: digitalization of shipping as a mechanism of industry dethronement

Konstantinos Poulis1, Gregorios C. Galanakis2, Gregory T. Triantafillou3, Efthimios Poulis2
1Middlesex University, London, UK
2Epsilon Hellas, Limassol, Cyprus
3International Maritime Employers’ Council (IMEC), London, UK

Tóm tắt

AbstractIn this conceptual paper, we review latest developments related to unmanned vessels and sketch potential scenarios that implicate with the existing maritime industry structure. On the one hand, we isolate a range of challenges that make the imminent realization of unmanned vessels seem like a rather utopian pursuit. On the other hand, we explain the reasons that may catalyse their emergence. Inspired by these opposing tensions, we highlight that the digital transformation of the shipping industry has the potential to enhance value within the industry’s ecosystem. However, we also contend that unmanned vessels -if realized- pose a very particular threat to the identity of the shipping industry as we know it. In particular, we build upon the concept of value migration and we highlight the drastic existential changes that may likely stem from a shift to non-seafarer-centric shipping. We conclude with questions that matter for industry dethronement purposes i.e., the possibility that existing industry structures may be substantially reconfigured following a removal of the seafarer as the nucleus of value creation in shipping.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adner R, Snow D (2010) Old technology responses to new technology threats: demand heterogeneity and technology retreats. Ind Corp Change 19(5):1655–1675

Aghion P, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P, Prantl S (2009) The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. The Rev Econ Stat 91(1):20–32

Allen CH (2018) Determining the legal status of unmanned maritime vehicles: formalism vs functionalism. J Mar Law Comm 49(4):477

Arqué-Castells P (2012) How venture capitalists spur invention in Spain: evidence from patent trajectories. Res Policy 41(5):897–912

Auerswald PE, Branscomb LM (2003) Valleys of death and Darwinian seas: financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States. J Tech Trans 28(3):227–239

Baines T, Lightfoot H, Smart P (2011) Servitization within manufacturing: exploring the provision of advanced services and their impact on vertical integration. J Manuf Tech Manag 22(7):947–954

Bertoni F, Tykvová T (2015) Does governmental venture capital spur invention and innovation? Evidence from young European biotech companies. Res Policy 44(4):925–935

Brown JR, Fazzari SM, Petersen BC (2009) Financing innovation and growth: cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. J of Fin 64(1):151–185

Burmeister HC, Bruhn W, Rødseth ØJ, Porathe T (2014) Transport Research Arena (TRA) 5th Conference: Transport Solutions from Research to Deployment. TRA, Paris

Canavari M, Centonze R, Hingley M, Spadoni R (2010) Traceability as part of competitive strategy in the fruit supply chain. Brit Food J 112(2):171–186

Caselli S, Gatti S, Perrini F (2009) Are venture capitalists a catalyst for innovation? Europ Fin Manag 15(1):92–111

Christensen CM, Overdorf M (2000) Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Bus Rev 78(2):66–77

Christensen CM, Raynor ME, McDonald R (2015) Disruptive innovation. Harvard Bus Rev 93(12):44–53

Cui L, Meyer KE, Hu HW (2014) What drives firms’ intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms. J of World Bus 49(4):488–501

D'Agostini E, Ryoo DK, Jo SH (2017) A study on Korean seafarer's perceptions towards unmanned ships. J of Navig and Port Res 41(6):381–388

Diekhof J (2015) Do entrants increase incumbents' innovation activity? Escaping the lock-in, stimulating technological change and the transition towards environmentally friendly vehicles. J of Innov Econ & Manag 1:101–137

Faria AP, Barbosa N (2014) Does venture capital really foster innovation? Econ Lett 122(2):129–131

Ferrari R (2015) Writing narrative style literature reviews. Med Writing 24:230–235

Fruth M, Teuteberg F (2017) Digitization in maritime logistics—what is there and what is missing? Cogent Business & Manag 4(1):1411066

Ghaderi H (2019) Autonomous technologies in short sea shipping: trends, feasibility and implications. Transp Rev 39(1):152–173

Gilbert C, Bower JL (2002) Disruptive change. When trying harder is part of the problem. Harvard Bus Rev 80(5):94–101

Grant MJ, Booth A (2009) A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inform Libr J 26:91–108

Habtay SR, Holmén M (2014) Incumbents’ responses to disruptive business model innovation: the moderating role of technology vs. market-driven innovation. Intern J Entr and Innov Manag 18(4):289–309

Hill CW, Rothaermel FT (2003) The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad Manag Rev 28(2):257–274

Hogg T, Ghosh S (2016) Autonomous merchant vessels: examination of factors that impact the effective implementation of unmanned ships. Austr J Mar Ocean Aff 8(3):206–222

Huntsberger T, Aghazarian H, Howard A, Trotz DC (2011) Stereo vision–based navigation for autonomous surface vessels. J Field Robotics 28(1):3–18

Jacobides MG, Billinger S (2006) Designing the boundaries of the firm: from “make, buy, or ally” to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Org Sci 17(2):249–261

Kammerlander N (2013) Organizational Adaptation to Discontinuous Technological Change. The Effects of Family Influence and Organizational Identity. Familienunternehmen und KMU. Gabler Verlag, Boston. p. XVIII, 334. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01315-8.

Karlis T (2018) Maritime law issues related to the operation of unmanned autonomous cargo ships. WMU J Mar Aff 17(1):119–128

Kretschmann L, Burmeister HC, Jahn C (2017) Analyzing the economic benefit of unmanned autonomous ships: an exploratory cost-comparison between an autonomous and a conventional bulk carrier. Res Transportation Bus Manag 25:76–86

Kumar P, Li D (2016) Capital investment, innovative capacity, and stock returns. J Fin 71(5):2059–2094

Kuo SY, Lin PC, Lu CS (2017) The effects of dynamic capabilities, service capabilities, competitive advantage, and organizational performance in container shipping. Transp Res Part A: Policy Practice 95:356–371

Lajili K, Madunic M, Mahoney J (2007) Testing organizational economics theories of vertical integration. In: Ketchen D, Bergh D (eds) Research methodology in strategy and management (research methodology in strategy and management, Vol. 4). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 343–368

Lambrou M, Watanabe D, Iida J (2019) Shipping digitalization management: conceptualization, typology and antecedents. J Ship Trade 4(1):11

Lee CB, Wan J, Shi W, Li K (2014) A cross-country study of competitiveness of the shipping industry. Transp Policy 35:366–376

Lehmann EE (2006) Does venture capital syndication spur employment growth and shareholder value? Evidence from German IPO data. Small Bus Econ 26(5):455–464

Lochner M, Duenser A, Lutzhoft M, Brooks B, Rozado D (2018) Analysis of maritime team workload and communication dynamics in standard and emergency scenarios. J Ship Trade 3(1):2

Mallam SC, Nazir S, Sharma A (2020) The human element in future Maritime Operations-perceived impact of autonomous shipping. Ergonomics, 63:(3):334–345, https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1659995.

Martin AY (2013) Unmanned maritime vehicles: technology evolution and implications. Mar Tech Soc J 47(5):72–83

Meles A, Monferrà S, Verdoliva V (2014) Do the effects of private equity investments on firm performance persist over time? App Fin Econ 24(3):203–218

Milakis D (2019) Long-term implications of automated vehicles: an introduction. Transp Rev 39:1–8

Mlimbila J, Mbamba UOL (2018) The role of information systems usage in enhancing port logistics performance: evidence from the Dar Es Salaam port, Tanzania. J Ship Trade 3(1):1–20

Naeem W, Irwin GW (2010) An automatic collision avoidance strategy for unmanned surface vehicles. In: Life system modeling and intelligent computing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 184–191

Naeem W, Irwin GW, Yang A (2012) COLREGs-based collision avoidance strategies for unmanned surface vehicles. Mechatronics 22(6):669–678

Ni H, Luan T, Cao Y, Finlay DC (2014) Can venture capital trigger innovation? New evidence from China. Int J Tech Manag 65(1–4):189–214

Osiyevskyy O, Dewald J (2015) Explorative versus exploitative business model change: the cognitive antecedents of firm-level responses to disruptive innovation. Strat Entr J 9(1):58–78

Paré G, Trudel MC, Jaana M, Kitsiou S (2015) Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Inform Manag 52:183–199

Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA (2014) A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods 5:371–385

Popov A, Roosenboom P (2012) Venture capital and patented innovation: evidence from Europe. Econ Pol 27(71):447–482

Porathe T (2014) Remote ,onitoring and control of unmanned vessels–the MUNIN shore control Centre. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on computer applications and information Technology in the Maritime Industries, pp 460–467

Porathe T, Prison J, Man Y (2014) Situation awareness in remote control centres for unmanned ships. In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Ship Design & Operation, 2014, London, p. 93–101

Progoulaki M, Theotokas I (2016) Managing culturally diverse maritime human resources as a shipping company’s core competency. Mar Pol Manag 43(7):860–873

Rindova VP, Kotha S (2001) Continuous “morphing”: competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad Manag J 44(6):1263–1280

Rødseth ØJ, Burmeister HC (2015) Risk assessment for an unmanned merchant ship. Trans Nav, Intern J Mar Navig Saf Sea Transp 9(3):357–64

Sandström C, Magnusson M, Jörnmark J (2009) Exploring factors influencing incumbents' response to disruptive innovation. Creat Innov Manag 18(1):8–15

Slywotzky AJ (1996) Value migration: how to think several moves ahead of the competition. Boston: Harvard Business Press

Smith KG, Ferrier WJ, Grimm CM (2001) King of the hill: dethroning the industry leader. Acad Manag Exec 15(2):59–70

Stenman A, Öhland S (2017) Interaction between unmanned vessels and colregs

Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Ran Plan 43(2):172–194

Ughetto E (2010) Assessing the contribution to innovation of private equity investors: a study on European buyouts. Res Pol 39(1):126–140

Van Hooydonk E (2014) The law of unmanned merchant shipping–an exploration. J Intern Marit Law 20(3):403–423

van Mossel A, van Rijnsoever FJ, Hekkert MP (2018) Navigators through the storm: a review of organization theories and the behavior of incumbent firms during transitions. Envir Innov Societ Trans 26:44–63

Vanelslander T, Sys C, Lam JS, Ferrari C, Roumboutsos A, Acciaro M, Macário R, Giuliano GA (2019) Serving innovation typology: mapping port-related innovations. Transp Rev 13:1–9

Vickery SK, Jayaram J, Droge C, Calantone R (2003) The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. J Oper Manag 21(5):523–539

Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quart 26:13–23

Wróbel K, Montewka J, Kujala P (2017) Towards the assessment of potential impact of unmanned vessels on maritime transportation safety. Rel Eng Syst Saf 165:155–169

Yang D, Wu L, Wang S, Jia H, Li KX (2019) How big data enriches maritime research–a critical review of automatic identification system (AIS) data applications. Transp Rev 39(6):755–773

Zahra SA, Kaul A, Bolívar-Ramos MT (2018) Why corporate science commercialization fails: integrating diverse perspectives. Acad Manag Persp 32(1):156–176