Value migration: digitalization of shipping as a mechanism of industry dethronement
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adner R, Snow D (2010) Old technology responses to new technology threats: demand heterogeneity and technology retreats. Ind Corp Change 19(5):1655–1675
Aghion P, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P, Prantl S (2009) The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. The Rev Econ Stat 91(1):20–32
Allen CH (2018) Determining the legal status of unmanned maritime vehicles: formalism vs functionalism. J Mar Law Comm 49(4):477
Arqué-Castells P (2012) How venture capitalists spur invention in Spain: evidence from patent trajectories. Res Policy 41(5):897–912
Auerswald PE, Branscomb LM (2003) Valleys of death and Darwinian seas: financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States. J Tech Trans 28(3):227–239
Baines T, Lightfoot H, Smart P (2011) Servitization within manufacturing: exploring the provision of advanced services and their impact on vertical integration. J Manuf Tech Manag 22(7):947–954
Bertoni F, Tykvová T (2015) Does governmental venture capital spur invention and innovation? Evidence from young European biotech companies. Res Policy 44(4):925–935
Brown JR, Fazzari SM, Petersen BC (2009) Financing innovation and growth: cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. J of Fin 64(1):151–185
Burmeister HC, Bruhn W, Rødseth ØJ, Porathe T (2014) Transport Research Arena (TRA) 5th Conference: Transport Solutions from Research to Deployment. TRA, Paris
Canavari M, Centonze R, Hingley M, Spadoni R (2010) Traceability as part of competitive strategy in the fruit supply chain. Brit Food J 112(2):171–186
Caselli S, Gatti S, Perrini F (2009) Are venture capitalists a catalyst for innovation? Europ Fin Manag 15(1):92–111
Christensen CM, Overdorf M (2000) Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Bus Rev 78(2):66–77
Christensen CM, Raynor ME, McDonald R (2015) Disruptive innovation. Harvard Bus Rev 93(12):44–53
Cui L, Meyer KE, Hu HW (2014) What drives firms’ intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms. J of World Bus 49(4):488–501
D'Agostini E, Ryoo DK, Jo SH (2017) A study on Korean seafarer's perceptions towards unmanned ships. J of Navig and Port Res 41(6):381–388
Diekhof J (2015) Do entrants increase incumbents' innovation activity? Escaping the lock-in, stimulating technological change and the transition towards environmentally friendly vehicles. J of Innov Econ & Manag 1:101–137
Fruth M, Teuteberg F (2017) Digitization in maritime logistics—what is there and what is missing? Cogent Business & Manag 4(1):1411066
Ghaderi H (2019) Autonomous technologies in short sea shipping: trends, feasibility and implications. Transp Rev 39(1):152–173
Gilbert C, Bower JL (2002) Disruptive change. When trying harder is part of the problem. Harvard Bus Rev 80(5):94–101
Grant MJ, Booth A (2009) A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inform Libr J 26:91–108
Habtay SR, Holmén M (2014) Incumbents’ responses to disruptive business model innovation: the moderating role of technology vs. market-driven innovation. Intern J Entr and Innov Manag 18(4):289–309
Hill CW, Rothaermel FT (2003) The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad Manag Rev 28(2):257–274
Hogg T, Ghosh S (2016) Autonomous merchant vessels: examination of factors that impact the effective implementation of unmanned ships. Austr J Mar Ocean Aff 8(3):206–222
Huntsberger T, Aghazarian H, Howard A, Trotz DC (2011) Stereo vision–based navigation for autonomous surface vessels. J Field Robotics 28(1):3–18
Jacobides MG, Billinger S (2006) Designing the boundaries of the firm: from “make, buy, or ally” to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Org Sci 17(2):249–261
Kammerlander N (2013) Organizational Adaptation to Discontinuous Technological Change. The Effects of Family Influence and Organizational Identity. Familienunternehmen und KMU. Gabler Verlag, Boston. p. XVIII, 334. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01315-8.
Karlis T (2018) Maritime law issues related to the operation of unmanned autonomous cargo ships. WMU J Mar Aff 17(1):119–128
Kretschmann L, Burmeister HC, Jahn C (2017) Analyzing the economic benefit of unmanned autonomous ships: an exploratory cost-comparison between an autonomous and a conventional bulk carrier. Res Transportation Bus Manag 25:76–86
Kumar P, Li D (2016) Capital investment, innovative capacity, and stock returns. J Fin 71(5):2059–2094
Kuo SY, Lin PC, Lu CS (2017) The effects of dynamic capabilities, service capabilities, competitive advantage, and organizational performance in container shipping. Transp Res Part A: Policy Practice 95:356–371
Lajili K, Madunic M, Mahoney J (2007) Testing organizational economics theories of vertical integration. In: Ketchen D, Bergh D (eds) Research methodology in strategy and management (research methodology in strategy and management, Vol. 4). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 343–368
Lambrou M, Watanabe D, Iida J (2019) Shipping digitalization management: conceptualization, typology and antecedents. J Ship Trade 4(1):11
Lee CB, Wan J, Shi W, Li K (2014) A cross-country study of competitiveness of the shipping industry. Transp Policy 35:366–376
Lehmann EE (2006) Does venture capital syndication spur employment growth and shareholder value? Evidence from German IPO data. Small Bus Econ 26(5):455–464
Lochner M, Duenser A, Lutzhoft M, Brooks B, Rozado D (2018) Analysis of maritime team workload and communication dynamics in standard and emergency scenarios. J Ship Trade 3(1):2
Mallam SC, Nazir S, Sharma A (2020) The human element in future Maritime Operations-perceived impact of autonomous shipping. Ergonomics, 63:(3):334–345, https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1659995.
Martin AY (2013) Unmanned maritime vehicles: technology evolution and implications. Mar Tech Soc J 47(5):72–83
Meles A, Monferrà S, Verdoliva V (2014) Do the effects of private equity investments on firm performance persist over time? App Fin Econ 24(3):203–218
Mlimbila J, Mbamba UOL (2018) The role of information systems usage in enhancing port logistics performance: evidence from the Dar Es Salaam port, Tanzania. J Ship Trade 3(1):1–20
Naeem W, Irwin GW (2010) An automatic collision avoidance strategy for unmanned surface vehicles. In: Life system modeling and intelligent computing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 184–191
Naeem W, Irwin GW, Yang A (2012) COLREGs-based collision avoidance strategies for unmanned surface vehicles. Mechatronics 22(6):669–678
Ni H, Luan T, Cao Y, Finlay DC (2014) Can venture capital trigger innovation? New evidence from China. Int J Tech Manag 65(1–4):189–214
Osiyevskyy O, Dewald J (2015) Explorative versus exploitative business model change: the cognitive antecedents of firm-level responses to disruptive innovation. Strat Entr J 9(1):58–78
Paré G, Trudel MC, Jaana M, Kitsiou S (2015) Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Inform Manag 52:183–199
Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA (2014) A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods 5:371–385
Popov A, Roosenboom P (2012) Venture capital and patented innovation: evidence from Europe. Econ Pol 27(71):447–482
Porathe T (2014) Remote ,onitoring and control of unmanned vessels–the MUNIN shore control Centre. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on computer applications and information Technology in the Maritime Industries, pp 460–467
Porathe T, Prison J, Man Y (2014) Situation awareness in remote control centres for unmanned ships. In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Ship Design & Operation, 2014, London, p. 93–101
Progoulaki M, Theotokas I (2016) Managing culturally diverse maritime human resources as a shipping company’s core competency. Mar Pol Manag 43(7):860–873
Rindova VP, Kotha S (2001) Continuous “morphing”: competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad Manag J 44(6):1263–1280
Rødseth ØJ, Burmeister HC (2015) Risk assessment for an unmanned merchant ship. Trans Nav, Intern J Mar Navig Saf Sea Transp 9(3):357–64
Sandström C, Magnusson M, Jörnmark J (2009) Exploring factors influencing incumbents' response to disruptive innovation. Creat Innov Manag 18(1):8–15
Slywotzky AJ (1996) Value migration: how to think several moves ahead of the competition. Boston: Harvard Business Press
Smith KG, Ferrier WJ, Grimm CM (2001) King of the hill: dethroning the industry leader. Acad Manag Exec 15(2):59–70
Stenman A, Öhland S (2017) Interaction between unmanned vessels and colregs
Ughetto E (2010) Assessing the contribution to innovation of private equity investors: a study on European buyouts. Res Pol 39(1):126–140
Van Hooydonk E (2014) The law of unmanned merchant shipping–an exploration. J Intern Marit Law 20(3):403–423
van Mossel A, van Rijnsoever FJ, Hekkert MP (2018) Navigators through the storm: a review of organization theories and the behavior of incumbent firms during transitions. Envir Innov Societ Trans 26:44–63
Vanelslander T, Sys C, Lam JS, Ferrari C, Roumboutsos A, Acciaro M, Macário R, Giuliano GA (2019) Serving innovation typology: mapping port-related innovations. Transp Rev 13:1–9
Vickery SK, Jayaram J, Droge C, Calantone R (2003) The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. J Oper Manag 21(5):523–539
Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quart 26:13–23
Wróbel K, Montewka J, Kujala P (2017) Towards the assessment of potential impact of unmanned vessels on maritime transportation safety. Rel Eng Syst Saf 165:155–169
Yang D, Wu L, Wang S, Jia H, Li KX (2019) How big data enriches maritime research–a critical review of automatic identification system (AIS) data applications. Transp Rev 39(6):755–773