Tính hợp lệ của các suy diễn từ hệ thống trách nhiệm giáo dục dựa trên kiểm tra

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington DC; American Educational Research Association. Ballou, D., Sanders, W. & Wright, P. (2004). Controlling for Student Background in Value-added Assessment of Teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 29(1), 37–65 Holland, P.W. (2002). Two Measures of Change in Gaps Between the CDFs of Test–score Distributions. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 27(1), 3–17 Kim, J.S. & Sunderman, G.L. (2005). Measuring Academic Proficiency Under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for Educational Equity. Educational Researcher 34(8), 3–13 Klein, S.P., Hamilton, L.S., McCaffrey, D.F. & Stecher, B.M. (2000). What do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us? Santa Monica CA; RAND. Koretz, D. (2005). Alignment, High Stakes, and the Inflation of Test Scores. In J.L. Herman & E.H. Haertel (eds.), Uses and Misuses of Data in Accountability Testing. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Vol. 104 Part 2 (pp. 99–118). Koretz, D. & Barron, S.I. (1998). The Validity of Gains on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). Santa Monica CA; RAND. Koretz, D., Linn, R.L., Dunbar, S.B. & Shepard, L.A. (1991). The Effects of High-stakes Testing on Achievement: Preliminary Findings about the Generalization of Findings Across Tests. Chicago; Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Linn, R.L. (1993). Linking Results of Distinct Assessments. Applied Measurement in Education 6(1), 83–102 Linn, R.L. (2003). Performance Standards: Utility for Different Uses of Assessments. Education Policy Analysis Archives 11 (31), available online at http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n31/., (September 1) Linn, R.L. (2005). Conflicting Demands of No Child Left Behind and State Systems: Mixed Messages About School Performance. Educational Policy Analysis Archives 13(33), available online at http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n33/., (June 28) Linn, R.L. (2007). Performance Standards: What is Proficient Performance? In C.E. Sleeter (ed.), Education for democracy and equity in an era of accountability. New York: Teachers College Press (in press). Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum. Martineau, J.A. (2006). Distorting Value Added: The Use of Longitudinal. Vertically Scaled Student Achievement Data for Growth-based, Value-added Accountability. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 31(1), 35–62 McCaffrey, D.F., Lockwood, J.R., Koretz, D., Louis, T.A. & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for Value-added Modeling of Teacher Effects. Journal of Educational Statistics 29(1), 67–101 Meyers, R.H. (2000). Value-added Indicators: A Powerful Tool for Evaluating Science and Mathematics Programs and Policies. NISE Brief, 3, No. 3. Madison, WI; National Center for Improving Science Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Mislevy, R.J. (1992). Linking Educational Assessments: Concepts, Methods, and Practice. Princeton, NJ; Educational Testing Service. Public Education Network (2006). Open to the Public: The Public Speaks Out on No Child Left Behind. Washington, DC; Public Education Network. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. Law No. 107–110 Novak, J.R. & Fuller, B. (2003). Penalizing Diverse Schools? Similar Test Scores, but Different Students, Bring Federal Sanctions. Policy Brief, December (3–4), Berkeley, CA, University of California Berkeley: Policy Analysis for California Education, available online at http://pace.berkeley.edu. Perie, M., Grigg, W. & Dion, G. (2005). The Nation’s Report Card: Mathematics 2005. (NCES 2006-453). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC; U.S. Government Printing Office. Perie, M., Grigg, W. & Donahue, P. (2005). The Nation’s Report Card: Reading 2005. (NCES 2006-451). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC; U.S. Government Printing Office. Raudenbush, S.W. (2004a). Schooling, Statistics, and Poverty: Can We Measure School Improvement? In The Ninth Annual William H. Angoff Memorial Lecture. Princeton, NJ; Educational Testing Service. Raudenbush, S.W. (2004b). What are Value-added Models Estimating and What Does this Imply for Statistical Practice? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 29(1), 120–129 Reckase, M.D. (2004). The Real World is More Complicated than We Would like. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 29(1), 117–120 Rose, I.C. & Gallup, A.M. (2005). The 37th Annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the Public’s Attitudes toward Public Education. Phi Delta Kappan 87(1); 41–57 Rubin, D.B., Stuart, E.A. & Zanutto, E.L. (2004). A Potential Outcomes View of Value-added Assessment. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 29(1), 103–116 Sanders, W. & Horn, S. (1998). Research Findings from the Tennessee Value Added Assessment System (TVAAS) Database: Implications for Educational Evaluation and Research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12(3), 247–256