Validation of a computerized version of the MNREAD chart for children

Marcelo Fernandes Costa1,2, Leonardo Dutra Henriques2, Givago Silva Souza3
1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências e Comportamento, Depto. Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
2Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
3Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e Núcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brasil

Tóm tắt

We aimed the develop and validate a computerized version of the MNREAD for the assessment of reading speed for children. A computerized version of the MNREAD was built in Psykinematix software using the same parameters as the physical chart. We measured the reading velocity of 104 children (n = 44 of the 3rd grade; n = 60 of the 5th grade). Bland-Altaman analysis was used to quantify agreement between two chart measurements. Comparison between the 3rd and 5th-grade children for physical and computerized MNREAD versions showed statistical differences in Maximum Reading Speed (F = 2669.6; p < 0.001), Critical Print Size (F = 17.49; p < 0.001), and Reading Acuity (F = 14.19; p = 0.002) with huge effect size (η2 = 0.930). No differences were found between the versions within grades. Bland–Altman analysis showed 95% of the data points within ± 2 s of the mean difference, suggesting a similarity between versions of the MNREAD parameters. Our reading speed values for children in the 5th grade were higher than previous studies, suggesting a better quality of the assessment in the computerized version. Tolerance Limits were calculated as normality references for clinical purposes.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Hazel CA et al (2000) Visual function and subjective quality of life compared in subjects with acquired macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(6):1309–1315 Merrill K et al (2011) Reading acuity in albinism: evaluation with MNREAD charts. J AAPOS 15(1):29–32 Akthar F et al (2021) A comparison of reading, in people with simulated and actual central vision loss, with static text, horizontally scrolling text, and rapid serial visual presentation. J Vis 21(12):5 Tanabe H et al (2020) Potential roles of MNREAD acuity charts and contrast/glare sensitivity in Ranibizumab treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion. PLoS ONE 15(7):e0235897 Altinbay D et al (2016) The evaluation of reading performance with minnesota low vision reading charts in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 23(4):302–306 Xiong YZ et al (2018) Reading acuity as a predictor of low-vision reading performance. Investigate Ophthalmol Vision Sci 59(12):4798–4803 Baskaran K et al (2023) Reading performance in Portuguese children from second to tenth grade with the MNREAD reading acuity test. J Optom 16(4):261–267 Mansfield JS et al (2019) Extending the MNREAD sentence corpus: Computer-generated sentences for measuring visual performance in reading. Vision Res 158:11–18 Bailey JE, Lakshminaryanan V (1997) Assessing reading ability in normal and low vision using the MNREAD reading acuity chart: preliminary results. Basic Clin Appl Vision Sci 60:247–250 Boadi-Kusi SB, Kwarteng MA, Asubonteng E (2019) Development and validation of the minnesota low vision reading test (MNRead) acuity chart for the asante twi language. Afr Health Sci 19(4):2945–2953 Calabrese A et al (2016) Baseline MNREAD measures for normally sighted subjects from childhood to old age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57(8):3836–3843 Virgili G et al (2004) Reading acuity in children: evaluation and reliability using MNREAD charts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45(9):3349–3354 Ishii M et al (2013) Reading performance in patients with glaucoma evaluated using the MNREAD charts. Jpn J Ophthalmol 57(5):471–474 Baskaran K et al (2019) Scoring reading parameters: an inter-rater reliability study using the MNREAD chart. PLoS ONE 14(6):e0216775 Calabrese A et al (2016) Development of a reading accessibility index using the MNREAD acuity chart. Jama Ophthalmol 134(4):398–405 Calabrese A et al (2018) Comparing performance on the MNREAD iPad application with the MNREAD acuity chart. J Vis 18(1):8 Castro CTM, Kallie CS, Salomao SR (2005) Elaboração e validação de tabela MNREAD para o idioma português. Arq Bras Oftalmol 68(6):777–783 Capovilla FC, Capovilla AGS (1998) 0 Desenvolvimento dos vocabulários receptivo e expressivo em crianças brasileiras. Int J Psychol 32(2):33–49 Subramanian A, Pardhan S (2009) Repeatability of reading ability indices in subjects with impaired vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(8):3643–3647 Arditi A, Cagenello R (1993) On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34(1):120–129 Giavarina D (2015) Understanding bland altman analysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 25(2):141–151 Dixon WJ, Massey FJ (1969) Introduction to statistical analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y. Virgili G et al (2004) Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a study using the MNREAD charts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45(10):3418–3424 Patel PJ et al (2011) Test-retest variability of reading performance metrics using MNREAD in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(6):3854–3859 DeCarlo DK et al (2020) Repeatability and validity of MNREAD test in children with vision impairment. Transl Vis Sci Technol 9(13):25 Bellocchi S, Leclercq V (2021) Exploring the moderation effect of educational stage on visual magnocellular functioning linked to reading: a study in french primary school children. Children (Basel) 8(2):68 Chung STL (2021) Training to improve temporal processing of letters benefits reading speed for people with central vision loss. J Vis 21(1):14 Giacomelli G et al (2010) Contrast reduction and reading: assessment and reliability with the reading explorer test. Eur J Ophthalmol 20(2):389–396