Validation of a Model of Gross Motor Function for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Tóm tắt
Background and Purpose. Development of gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy (CP) has not been documented. The purposes of this study were to examine a model of gross motor function in children with CP and to apply the model to construct gross motor function curves for each of the 5 levels of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). Subjects. A stratified sample of 586 children with CP, 1 to 12 years of age, who reside in Ontario, Canada, and are known to rehabilitation centers participated. Methods. Subjects were classified using the GMFCS, and gross motor function was measured with the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM). Four models were examined to construct curves that described the nonlinear relationship between age and gross motor function. Results. The model in which both the limit parameter (maximum GMFM score) and the rate parameter (rate at which the maximum GMFM score is approached) vary for each GMFCS level explained 83% of the variation in GMFM scores. The predicted maximum GMFM scores differed among the 5 curves (level I=96.8, level II=89.3, level III=61.3, level IV=36.1, and level V=12.9). The rate at which children at level II approached their maximum GMFM score was slower than the rates for levels I and III. The correlation between GMFCS levels and GMFM scores was −.91. Logistic regression, used to estimate the probability that children with CP are able to achieve gross motor milestones based on their GMFM total scores, suggests that distinctions between GMFCS levels are clinically meaningful. Conclusion and Discussion. Classification of children with CP based on functional abilities and limitations is predictive of gross motor function, whereas age alone is a poor predictor. Evaluation of gross motor function of children with CP by comparison with children of the same age and GMFCS level has implications for decision making and interpretation of intervention outcomes.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ingram, 1964, Paediatric Aspects of Cerebral Palsy
Perlstein, 1952, Infantile cerebral palsy: classification and clinical correlations, JAMA, 149, 30, 10.1001/jama.1952.02930180032007
Minear, 1956, A classification system for cerebral palsy, Pediatrics, 18, 841, 10.1542/peds.18.5.841
Paine, 1962, On the treatment of cerebral palsy: the outcome of 177 patients, 74 totally untreated, Pediatrics, 29, 605
Shevell, 1998, Clinical ethics and developmental delay, Semin Pediatr Neurol, 5, 70, 10.1016/S1071-9091(98)80021-1
Marsh, 1998, Caregiver burden at 6 months following severe traumatic brain injury, Brain Inj, 12, 225, 10.1080/026990598122700
1968, Joint Statement: The Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children, Dev Med Child Neurol, 10, 243
Campbell, 1992, Measurement of motor performance, Movement Disorders in Children, 264
Palisano, 1992, Research on the effectiveness of neurodevelopmental treatment, Pediatric Physical Therapy, 3, 143
Rosenbaum, 1990, Issues in measuring change in motor function in children with cerebral palsy: a special communication, Phys Ther, 70, 125, 10.1093/ptj/70.2.125
Campbell, 1990, Physicians' beliefs in the efficacy of physical therapy management of cerebral palsy, Pediatric Physical Therapy, 2, 169, 10.1097/00001577-199002030-00011
Crothers, 1959, Natural History of Cerebral Palsy
Beals, 1966, Spastic paraplegia and diplegia: an evaluation of non-surgical and surgical factors influencing the prognosis for ambulation, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 48, 827, 10.2106/00004623-196648050-00001
Bose, 1975, The locomotor assessment of cerebral palsy, Proceedings (Singapore), 10, 21
Forbes, 1968, A method for evaluating the results of surgery in cerebral palsy, Can Med Assoc J, 98, 646
Reimers, 1972, A scoring system for evaluation of ambulation in cerebral palsied patients, Dev Med Child Neurol, 14, 332, 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1972.tb02598.x
Palisano, 1997, Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy, Dev Med Child Neurol, 39, 214, 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x
Bax, 1964, Terminology and classification of cerebral palsy, Dev Med Child Neurol, 6, 295, 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1964.tb10791.x
Wood, 2000, The Gross Motor Function Classification System for Cerebral Palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time, Dev Med Child Neurol, 42, 292, 10.1017/S0012162200000529
Russell, 1989, The gross motor function measure: a means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy, Dev Med Child Neurol, 31, 341, 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1989.tb04003.x
Russell, Gross Motor Function Measure: A Measure of Gross Motor Function in Cerebral Palsy
Bjornson, 1998, Validity of the Gross Motor Function Measure, Pediatric Physical Therapy, 10, 43, 10.1097/00001577-199801020-00002
Bjornson, 1998, Test-retest reliability of the Gross Motor Function Measure in children with cerebral palsy, Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 18, 51, 10.1080/J006v18n02_03
Russell, 1994, Training users in the use of the Gross Motor Function Measure: methodological and practical issues, Phys Ther, 74, 630, 10.1093/ptj/74.7.630
Scrutton, 1997, The locomotor development of children with cerebral palsy, Neurophysiology and Neuropsychology of Motor Development, 116
Draper, 1981, Applied Regression Analysis
Pedhazer, 1982, Multiple Regression in Behavioural Research: Explanation and Prediction
Palmer, 1988, The effects of physical therapy on cerebral palsy: a controlled trial in infants with spastic diplegia, N Engl J Med, 318, 803, 10.1056/NEJM198803313181302
Piper, 1990, Early physical therapy effects on the high-risk infant: a randomized controlled trial, Pediatrics, 78, 216, 10.1542/peds.78.2.216
Ottenbacher, 1986, Quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of pediatric therapy: emphasis on the neurodevelopmental treatment approach, Phys Ther, 66, 1095, 10.1093/ptj/66.7.1095
Iezzoni, 1994, Using risk-adjusted outcomes to assess clinical practice: an overview of issues pertaining to risk adjustment, Ann Thorac Surg, 58, 1822, 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91721-3