Validation of BWR spent nuclear fuel isotopic predictions with applications to burnup credit

Standard Test Method for Atom Percent Fission in Uranium and Plutonium Fuel (Neodymium-148 Method), ASTM Standard, ASTM E321 – 96, 2012. Barbero, 1979 Boulanger, 2004, High burnup PWR and BWR MOX fuel performance: a review of belgonucleaire recent experimental programs Burnup Credit for LWR Fuel, 2008. ANS-8.27-2008, American National Standard, American Nuclear Society, Lagrange Park, Illinois. Chadwick, 2011, ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data, Nucl. Data Sheets, 112, 2887, 10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002 Conde, J., Alejano, C., Rey, J.M., 2006. Nuclear Fuel Research Activities of the Consejo De Seguridad Nuclear. In: Transactions of the 2006 International Meeting on LWR Fuel Performance, TopFuel 2006, Salamanca, Spain. DeHart, 2011, Reactor physics methods and analysis capabilities in SCALE, Nucl. Technol., 174, 196, 10.13182/NT174-196 DeHart, 2008 Devida, 2004, A quantitative burn-up determination: a comparison of different experimental methods, pp. 106–113 England, 1994 Gauld, 2011, Isotopic depletion and decay methods and analysis capabilities in SCALE, Nucl. Technol., 174, 169, 10.13182/NT11-3 Gauld, I.C., 2003. Strategies for Application of Isotopic Uncertainties in Burnup Credit, NUREG/CR-6811, prepared for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Guenther, 1991 Hannstein, 2017, 621 Hermann, 1998 Ilas, 2012, Validation of new depletion capabilities and ENDF/B-VII data libraries in SCALE, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 46, 43, 10.1016/j.anucene.2012.03.012 Inoue, 1995, Void fraction distribution in BWR fuel assembly and evaluation of subchannel code, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 32, 629, 10.1080/18811248.1995.9731754 Interim Staff Guidance 8, 2012, Revision 3, “Burnup Credit in the Criticality Safety Analyses of PWR Spent Fuel in Transportation and Storage Casks.” US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. <https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1226/ML12261A186.pdf>. Jessee, 2014, Polaris: a new two-dimensional lattice physics analysis capability for the SCALE code system Lindström, F., 2011. Forsmark 3 – Characteristic Data of Fuel Rod J8 in Bundle GN592, VNF-1002152744/02, Vattenfall Nuclear Fuel AB report. MALIBU Program, 2010. Irradiation Data Report of the MALIBU Extension Program, SCK•CEN report MA 2010/05. MALIBU Program, 2015. Final Report on the Extension Scope, SCK·CEN report MA 2015/20. Marshall, W.J., Ade, B. J., Bowman, S., Martinez-Gonzalez, J.S., 2016. Axial Moderator Density Distributions, Control Blade Usage, and Axial Burnup Distributions for Extended BWR Burnup Credit, NUREG/CR-7224 (ORNL/TM-2015/544). In: prepared for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn. Mays, C.W., 2004. Code to Code Comparison of One- and Two-Dimensional Methods, AREVA document 32-5048840-00, DOC.20041015.0003. Mertyurek, 2010 Mertyurek, 2018 Michel-Sendis, 2017, SFCOMPO-2.0: An OECD/NEA database of spent nuclear fuel isotopic assays, reactor design specifications, and operating data, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 110, 779, 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.07.022 Morooka, 1989, Experimental study on void fraction in a simulated BWR fuel assembly (evaluation of cross-sectional averaged void fraction), Nucl. Eng. Des., 114, 91, 10.1016/0029-5493(89)90128-3 Mueller, D.E., Scaglione, J.M., Wagner, J.C., Bowman, S.M., 2013. Computational Benchmark for Estimated Reactivity Margin from Fission Products and Minor Actinides in BWR Burnup Credit, NUREG/CR-7157, prepared for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn. Nakahara, 2000 Nakahara, 2002, Nuclide composition benchmark data set for verifying burnup codes on spent light water reactor fuels, Nucl. Technol., 137, 111, 10.13182/NT02-2 Spent Fuel Assay Data for Isotopic Validation: State of the Art Report, NEA/NSC/WPNCS/DOC (2011) 5, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 2011. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 2016. Evaluation Guide for the Evaluated Spent Nuclear Fuel Assay Database (SFCOMPO), NEA/NSC/R 2015, 8. OECD/NEA Working Party on Nuclear Criticality Safety, Expert Group on Assay Data for Spent Nuclear Fuel. <https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/wpncs/ADSNF/index.html>. Ortego, 2013 Parks, 2000 Pigni, 2015, Investigation of inconsistent ENDF/B-VII.1 independent and cumulative fission product yields with proposed revisions, Nucl. Data Sheets, 123, 231, 10.1016/j.nds.2014.12.040 Primm, 2002 Radulescu, 2003 Radulescu, 2014, Approach for validating actinide and fission product compositions for burnup credit criticality safety analyses, Nucl. Technol., 188, 154, 10.13182/NT13-154 Reager, 2003 Rearden, B.T., Jessee, M.A. (Eds.), 2017. SCALE Code System, ORNL/TM-2005/39, Version 6.2.2, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Available from Radiation Safety Information Computational Center as CCC-834. <https://www.ornl.gov/sites/default/ files/SCALE_6.2.3.pdf>. Rowlands, 1964, Resonance absorption and nonuniform temperature distributions, J. Nucl. Energy Parts A/B Reactor Sci. Technol., 16, 235, 10.1016/0368-3230(62)90294-X Sublet, 2003 Suzuki, 2013, Lattice physics analysis of measured isotopic compositions of irradiated BWR 9 × 9 UO2 fuel, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 50, 1161, 10.1080/00223131.2013.837845 Wagner, 1999 Wells, A.H., 2004. Isotopic Model for Commercial SNF Burnup Credit, US Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management report CAL-DSU-NU-000007 REV 00B. <https://doi.org/10.2172/862151>. Wieselquist, 2013, Comparison of burnup credit uncertainty quantification methods Williams, 2013, A statistical sampling method for uncertainty analysis with SCALE and XSUSA, Nucl. Technol., 183, 515, 10.13182/NT12-112 Williams, 2012, The embedded self-shielding method Wimmer, L., 2004. Isotopic Generation and Confirmation of the BWR Application Model, AREVA Framatome ANP, Document 32-5035847-01 Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office, DOC 20040630.0007. <https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0923/ML092310719.pdf>. Yamamoto, 2008, Lattice physics analysis of burnups and isotope inventories of U, Pu, and Nd of irradiated BWR 9×9-9 UO2 fuel assemblies, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 45, 547, 10.1080/18811248.2008.9711879 Yamamoto, 2008, Nuclear analysis of PIE data of irradiated BWR 8×8-2 and 8×8-4 UO2 fuel assemblies, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 45, 1193, 10.1080/18811248.2008.9711908 Yamamoto, T., 2012. Compilation of Measurement and Analysis Results of Isotopic Inventories of Spent BWR Fuels, report contributed to the OECD/NEA and included as part of the SFCOMPO spent fuel database. Yamamoto, T., 2014. Irradiation Report of Fuel Samples of BWR 9 × 9-9 Fuel, report prepared for the OECD NEA Data Bank contribution to SFCOMPO. Zwicky, H.-U., Low, J., Granfors, M., 2010. Fuel Pellet Isotopic Analyses of Samples from a GE14 Fuel Rod Irradiated in Forsmark 3—Final Report, STUDSVIK/N-10/007, Studsvik Nuclear AB report. Zwicky, H.U., 2008. Isotopic Data of Sample F3F6 from a Rod Irradiated in the Swedish Boling Water Reactor FORSMARK 3, ZC-08/001. ≤https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/wpncs/ADSNF/ reports/Forsmark3/F3F6.pdf≥.