Validation and Extension of a Fluid–Structure Interaction Model of the Healthy Aortic Valve
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aquelet, N., C. Seddon, M. Souli, and M. Moatamedi. Initialisation of volume fraction in fluid/structure interaction problem. Int. J. Crashworthiness 10(3):237–247, 2005.
Barannyk, O., and P. Oshkai. The influence of the aortic root geometry on flow characteristics of a prosthetic heart valve. J. Biomech. Eng. 137(5):051005, 2015.
Bellhouse, B. J., F. H. Bellhouse, and K. G. Reid. Fluid mechanics of the aortic root with application to coronary flow. Nature 219(5158):1059–1061, 1968.
Bellhouse, B. J., and L. Talbot. Fluid mechanics of the aortic valve. Br. Heart J. 31(3):391, 1969.
Billiar, K. L., and M. S. Sacks. Biaxial mechanical properties of the natural and glutaraldehyde treated aortic valve cusp–Part II: A structural constitutive model. J. Biomech. Eng. 122(1):23–30, 2000.
Black, M. M., I. C. Howard, X. Huang, and E. A. Patterson. A three-dimensional analysis of a bioprosthetic heart valve. J. Biomech. 24(9):793–801, 1991.
Borazjani, I. Fluid-structure interaction, immersed boundary-finite element method simulations of bio-prosthetic heart valves. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 257:103–116, 2013.
Bozkurt, S., G. L. Preston-Maher, R. Torii, and G. Burriesci. Design, analysis and testing of a novel mitral valve for transcatheter implantation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45(8):1852–1864, 2017.
Carmody, C. J., G. Burriesci, I. C. Howard, and E. A. Patterson. An approach to the simulation of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve. J. Biomech. 39(1):158–169, 2006.
Dasi, L. P., L. Ge, A. H. Simon, F. Sotiropoulos, and P. A. Yoganathan. Vorticity dynamics of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve in an axisymmetric aorta. Phys. Fluids 2007. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2743261 .
Dasi, L. P., H. A. Simon, P. Sucosky, and A. P. Yoganathan. Fluid mechanics of artificial heart valves. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 36(2):225–237, 2009.
Ducci, A., F. Pirisi, S. Tzamtzis, and G. Burriesci. Transcatheter aortic valves produce unphysiological flows which may contribute to thromboembolic events: an in-vitro study. J. Biomech. 49(16):4080–4089, 2016.
Ducci, A., S. Tzamtzis, M. J. Mullen, and G. Burriesci. Hemodynamics in the Valsalva sinuses after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). J. Heart Valve Dis. 22(5):688–696, 2013.
Dumont, I. K. Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Heart Valve Dynamics. Ghent: Ghent University, pp. 1–272, 2005.
Dumont, K., J. M. A. Stijnen, J. Vierendeels, F. N. van de Vosse, and P. R. Verdonck. Validation of a fluid-structure interaction model of a heart valve using the dynamic mesh method in fluent. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin. 7(3):139–146, 2004.
Escobar Kvitting, J. P., T. Ebbers, L. Wigström, J. Engvall, C. L. Olin, and A. F. Bolger. Flow patterns in the aortic root and the aorta studied with time-resolved, 3-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: Implications for aortic valve-sparing surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 127(6):1602–1607, 2004.
European Committee for Standardization. Cardiovascular Implants—Cardiac Valve Prostheses (ISO 5840:2005). Washington, DC: European Committee for Standardization, 2005.
Falahatpisheh, A., and A. Kheradvar. High-speed particle image velocimetry to assess cardiac fluid dynamics in vitro: from performance to validation. Eur. J. Mech. B 35:2–8, 2012.
Gnyaneshwar, R., R. K. Kumar, and K. R. Balakrishnan. Dynamic analysis of the aortic valve using a finite element model. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 73(4):1122–1129, 2002.
Gorlin, R., and S. G. Gorlin. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. Am. Heart J. 41(5):1–29, 1951.
Guccione, M. B., J. M. Kassab, and G. Ratcliffe. Computational Cardiovascular Mechanics. New York: Springer, 2010.
Guivier-Curien, C., V. Deplano, and E. Bertrand. Validation of a numerical 3-D fluid-structure interaction model for a prosthetic valve based on experimental PIV measurements. Med. Eng. Phys. 31(8):986–993, 2009.
Hallquist, J. O. LS-DYNA Theory Manual. Troy: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2006.
Holzapfel, G. A. Biomechanics of soft tissue. In: The Handbook of Materials Behavior Models, Vol. 3, edited by J. Lemaitre. New York: Academic Press, 2001, pp. 1049–1063.
Howard, I. C., E. A. Patterson, and A. Yoxall. On the opening mechanism of the aortic valve: some observations from simulations. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 27(6):259–266, 2003.
Joda, A., Z. Jin, A. Haverich, J. Summers, and S. Korossis. Multiphysics simulation of the effect of leaflet thickness inhomogeneity and material anisotropy on the stress–strain distribution on the aortic valve. J. Biomech. 49(12):2502–2512, 2016.
Kalyana Sundaram, G. B., K. R. Balakrishnan, and R. K. Kumar. Aortic valve dynamics using a fluid structure interaction model—the physiology of opening and closing. J. Biomech. 48(10):1737–1744, 2015.
Kemp, I., et al. Experimental validation of the fluid-structure interaction simulation of a bioprosthetic aortic heart valve. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 36(3):363–373, 2013.
LS-DYNA Aerospace Working Group. Modeling Guidelines Document. Solihull: LS-DYNA Aerospace Working Group, 2011.
Luraghi, G., F. Migliavacca, and J. F. Rodriguez Matas. Study on the accuracy of structural and FSI heart valves simulations. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 1:1–16, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-018-00373-3 .
Mao, W., K. Li, and W. Sun. Fluid–structure interaction study of transcatheter aortic valve dynamics using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 7(4):374–388, 2016.
Mofrad, M. R. K., and L. R. Croft. Computational modeling of aortic heart valves. In: Computational Cardiovascular Mechanics, edited by M. R. K. Mofrad, and L. R. Croft. New York: Springer, 2010.
Moore, B. L., and L. P. Dasi. Coronary flow impacts aortic leaflet mechanics and aortic sinus hemodynamics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 43(9):2231–2241, 2015.
Nobari, S., R. Mongrain, E. Gaillard, R. Leask, and R. Cartier. Therapeutic vascular compliance change may cause significant variation in coronary perfusion: a numerical study. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 1:1–12, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/791686 .
Nobari, S., R. Mongrain, R. Leask, and R. Cartier. The effect of aortic wall and aortic leaflet stiffening on coronary hemodynamic: A fluid-structure interaction study. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 51(8):923–936, 2013.
Ranga, A., O. Bouchot, R. Mongrain, P. Ugolini, and R. Cartier. Computational simulations of the aortic valve validated by imaging data: evaluation of valve-sparing techniques. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 5(4):373–378, 2006.
Reul, S., H. Vahlbruch, M. Giersiepen, M. Schmitz-Rode, T. H. Hirtz, and V. Effert. The geometry of the aortic root in health, at valve disease and after valve replacement. J. Biomech. 23(2):181–191, 1990.
Sacks, M. S., W. David-Merryman, and D. E. Schmidt. On the biomechanics of heart valve function. J. Biomech. 42(12):1804–1824, 2009.
Sacks, M. S., and A. P. Yoganathan. Heart valve function: a biomechanical perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 362(1484):1369–1391, 2007.
Salica, A., et al. The combined role of sinuses of Valsalva and flow pulsatility improves energy loss of the aortic valve. Eur. J. Cardio-thoracic Surg. 49(4):1222–1227, 2016.
Sirois, E., Q. Wang, and W. Sun. Fluid simulation of a transcatheter aortic valve deployment into a patient-specific aortic root. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 2(3):186–195, 2011.
Sodhani, D., S. Reese, R. Moreira, S. Jockenhoevel, P. Mela, and S. E. Stapleton. Multi-scale modelling of textile reinforced artificial tubular aortic heart valves. Meccanica 52(3):677–693, 2017.
Sturla, F., E. Votta, M. Stevanella, C. A. Conti, and A. Redaelli. Impact of modeling fluid-structure interaction in the computational analysis of aortic root biomechanics. Med. Eng. Phys. 35(12):1721–1730, 2013.
Swanson, W. M., and R. E. Clark. Dimensions and geometric relationships of the human aortic value as a function of pressure. Circ. Res. 35(6):871–882, 1974.
Thubrikar, M. The Aortic Valve. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1990.
Thubrikar, M. J., M. R. Labrosse, K. J. Zehr, F. Robicsek, G. G. Gong, and B. L. Fowler. Aortic root dilatation may alter the dimensions of the valve leaflets. Eur. J. Cardio-thoracic Surg. 28(6):850–855, 2005.
Toninato, R., J. Salmon, F. M. Susin, A. Ducci, and G. Burriesci. Physiological vortices in the sinuses of Valsalva: an in vitro approach for bio-prosthetic valves. J. Biomech. 49(13):2635–2643, 2016.
Van Steenhoven, A. A., and M. E. H. Van Dongen. Model studies of the closing behaviour of the aortic valve. J. Fluid. Mech. 90:21–32, 1979.
Wald, S., A. Liberzon, and I. Avrahami. A numerical study of the hemodynamic effect of the aortic valve on coronary flow. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 17:319–338, 2017.
Wei, Z. A., S. J. Sonntag, M. Toma, S. Singh-Gryzbon, and W. Sun. Computational fluid dynamics assessment associated with transcatheter heart valve prostheses: a position paper of the ISO Working Group. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 9:289–299, 2018.
Weinberg, E. J., and M. R. Kaazempur-Mofrad. Transient, three-dimensional, multiscale simulations of the human aortic valve. Cardiovasc. Eng. 7(4):140–155, 2007.
Yap, C. H., N. Saikrishnan, and A. P. Yoganathan. Experimental measurement of dynamic fluid shear stress on the ventricular surface of the aortic valve leaflet. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 11(1–2):231–244, 2012.
Yoganathan, A. P., K. B. Chandran, and F. Sotiropoulos. Flow in prosthetic heart valves: State-of-the-art and future directions. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33(12):1689–1694, 2005.
Yoganathan, A. P., Z. He, and S. Casey-Jones. Fluid mechanics of heart valves. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 6(1):331–362, 2004.