Validating indicators of interdisciplinarity: linking bibliometric measures to studies of engineering research labs

Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek—program for large network analysis. Connections, 21(2), 47–57. Carley, S., & Porter, A. L. (2012). A forward diversity index. Scientometrics. De Keulenaer, G. W., Chappell, D. C., Ishizaka, N., et al. (1998). Oscillatory and steady laminar shear stress differentially affect human endothelial redox state—role of a superoxide-producing NADH oxidase. Circulation Research, 82(10), 1094–1101. Garner, J., & Porter, A. L. (2011). Assessing the human and social dynamics program—exceptional cross-disciplinarity. Atlanta: Proceedings, Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy. Ku, D. N. (1997). Blood flow in arteries. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 29, 399–434. Levesque, M. J., & Nerem, R. M. (1985). The elongation and orientation of cultured endothelial-cells in response to shear-stress. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering Transactions of the ASME, 107(4), 341–347. Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51, 203–222. National Academies Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Committee on Science, Engineering and Ublic Policy. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington: National Academies Press. Nersessian, N. J. (2009). How do engineering scientists think? Model-based simulation in biomedical engineering research laboratories. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 730–757. Nersessian, N. J., & Patton, C. (2009). Model-based reasoning in interdisciplinary engineering. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science. Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences (pp. 687–718). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Nishida, K., Harrison, D. G., Navas, J. P., et al. (1992). Molecular-cloning and characterization of the constitutive bovine aortic endothelial-cell nitric-oxide synthase. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 90(5), 2092–2096. Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, J. D., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117–147. Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745. Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., & Heberger, A. E. (2008). How interdisciplinary is a given body of research? Research Evaluation, 17(4), 273–282. Rafols, I. (2007). Strategies for knowledge acquisition in bionanotechnology: why are interdisciplinary practices less widespread than expected? Innovation. The European Journal of Social Sciences, 20(4), 395–412. Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2007). How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics, 70(3), 633–650. Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287. Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707–719. Stokols, D., Hall, K. L., et al. (2008). The science of team science—overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2), S77–S89. Uematsu, M., Ohara, Y., Navas, J. P., et al. (1995). Regulation of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression by shear stress. American Journal of Physiology Cell Physiology, 269(6), C1371–C1378. Wagner, C. S., Roessner, J. D., Bobb, K., Klein, J. T., Boyack, K. W., Keyton, J., et al. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 14–26.