Validating Function-Based Design Methods: an Explanationist Perspective
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamson, A. (2005). Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 421–441. MIT Press.
Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R.C. (1993/2010). Discovering complexity: decomposition and localization a strategies in scientific research.
Bell, J., Snooke, N., & Price, C. (2005). Functional decomposition for interpretation of model based simulation. Proceedings of the 19th international workshop on qualitative reasoning, QR-05, 192–198.
Bell, J., Snooke, N., & Price, C. (2007). A language for functional interpretation of model based simulation. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 21, 398–409.
Carrara, M., Garbacz, P., & Vermaas, P. E. (2011). If engineering function is a family resemblance concept: Assessing three formalization strategies. Applied Ontology, 6, 141–163.
Chakrabarti, A., & Bligh, T. P. (2001). A scheme for functional reasoning in conceptual design. Design Studies, 22, 493–517.
Chandrasekaran, B., & Josephson, J. R. (2000). Function in device representation. Engineering with Computers, 16, 162–177.
Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.
Craver, C. F., & Bechtel, W. (2007). Top-down causation without top-down causes. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 547–563.
Deng, Y. M. (2002). Function and behavior representation in conceptual mechanical design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, 16, 343–362.
Erden, M. S., Komoto, H., Van Beek, T. J., D’Amelio, V., Echavarria, E., & Tomiyama, T. (2008). A Review of function modeling: Approaches and applications. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, 22, 147–169.
Gero, J. S. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11(4), 26–36.
Gervais, R., & Weber, E. (2013). Plausibility versus richness in mechanistic models. Philosophical Psychology, 26(1), 139–152.
Glennan, S. (2005). Modeling mechanisms. Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36(2), 375–388.
Goel, A. K. (2013). A 30-year case study and 15 principles: Implications of an artificial intelligence methodology for functional modeling. AI EDAM, 27(3), 203–215.
Harbecke, J. (2010). Mechanistic constitution in neurobiological explanations. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 24, 267–285.
Hawkins, P. G., & Woollons, D. J. (1998). Failure modes and effects analysis of complex engineering systems using functional models. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 12(4), 375–397.
Houkes, W., & Vermaas, P. E. (2010). Technical functions: On the use and design of artefacts. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kaplan, D., & Craver, C. (2011). The explanatory force of dynamical and mathematical models in neuroscience: A mechanistic perspective. Philosophy of Science, 78, 601–627.
Kitamura, Y., Koji, Y., & Mizoguchi, R. (2005). An ontological model of device function: Industrial deployment and lessons learned. Applied Ontology, 1, 237–262.
Kroes, P. (2003). Screwdriver philosophy; Searle’s analysis of technical functions. Techné, 6(3), 22–35.
Leuridan, B. (2010). Can mechanisms really replace laws of nature? Philosophy of Science, 77, 317–340.
Leuridan, B. (2012). Three problems for the mutual manipulability account of constitutive relevance in mechanisms. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(2), 399–427.
Levy, A., & Bechtel, W. (2013). Abstraction and the organization of mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 80, 241–261.
Machamer, P. K., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 57, 1–25.
Maier, J. R. A., & Fadel, G. M. (2009). Affordance based design: A relational theory for design. Research in Engineering Design, 20, 13–27.
Matthewson, J., & Calcott, B. (2011). Mechanistic models of population-level phenomena. Biology and Philosophy, 26(5), 737–756.
McKay Illari, P., & Williamson, J. (2010). Function and organization: Comparing the mechanisms of protein synthesis and natural selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 41, 279–291.
Nervi, M. (2010). Mechanism, malfunctions and explanation in medicine. Biology and Philosophy, 25, 215–228.
Otto, K. N., & Wood, K. L. (1998). Product evolution: A reverse engineering and redesign methodology. Research in Engineering Design, 10, 226–243.
Otto, K. N., & Wood, K. L. (2001). Product design: Techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Piccinini, G., & Craver, C.F. (2011). Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Functional analyses as mechanism sketches. 183, 283–311.
Preston, B. (1998). Why is a wing like a spoon? A pluralist theory of functions. Journal of Philosophy, 95, 215–254.
Price, C. J. (1998). Function-directed electrical design analysis. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 12(4), 445–456.
Soom, P. (2012). Mechanisms, determination and the metaphysics of neuroscience. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 655–664.
Stone, R. B., & Chakrabarti, A. (2005). Guest editorial. Special issue: Engineering applications of representations of function, part 2. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 19(3), 137.
Stone, R. B., & Wood, K. L. (2000). Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122, 359–370.
Strevens, M. (2004). The causal and unification approaches to explanation unified—causally. Noûs, 38(1), 154–176.
Strevens, M. (2008). Depth: An account of scientific explanation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
van Eck, D. (2010). On the conversion of functional models: bridging differences between functional taxonomies in the modeling of user actions. Research in Engineering Design, 21(2), 99–111.
van Eck, D. (2011). Supporting design knowledge exchange by converting models of functional decomposition. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(11-12), 839–858.
van Eck, D., & Weber, E. (2014). Function ascription and explanation: elaborating an explanatory utility desideratum for ascriptions of technical functions. Erkenntnis. doi: 10.1007/s10670-014-9605-1 .
Vermaas, P. E. (2009). The flexible meaning of function in engineering. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 09, 2, 113–124.
Vermaas PE (2011) Accepting ambiguity of engineering functional descriptions. In eProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 15–18, 2011. Design Society: 1–10
Vermaas, P. E. (2013). The coexistence of engineering meanings of function: Four responses and their methodological implications. AI EDAM, 27(3), 191–202.
Vermaas, P. E., & Eckert, C. (2013). My functional description is better! AI EDAM, 27(3), 187–190.
Vermaas, P. E., & Houkes, W. (2003). Ascribing functions to technical artefacts: A challenge to etiological accounts of functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 261–289.
Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.