Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the Measurement of Maladaptive Personality and Psychopathology

Assessment - Tập 25 Số 5 - Trang 596-607 - 2018
Jaime L. Anderson1,2, Martin Sellbom3, Randall T. Salekin2
1Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA
2University Of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
3University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Tóm tắt

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth edition ( DSM-5) Personality and Personality Disorders workgroup developed the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) for the assessment of the alternative trait model for DSM-5. Along with this measure, the American Psychiatric Association published an abbreviated version, the PID-5–Brief form (PID-5-BF). Although this measure is available on the DSM-5 website for use, only two studies have evaluated its psychometric properties and validity and no studies have examined the U.S. version of this measure. The current study evaluated the reliability, factor structure, and construct validity of PID-5-BF scale scores. This included an evaluation of the scales’ associations with Section II PDs, a well-validated dimensional measure of personality psychopathology, and broad externalizing and internalizing psychopathology measures. We found support for the reliability of PID-5-BF scales as well as for the factor structure of the measure. Furthermore, a series of correlation and regression analyses showed conceptually expected associations between PID-5-BF and external criterion variables. Finally, we compared the correlations with external criterion measures to those of the full-length PID-5 and PID-5–Short form. Intraclass correlation analyses revealed a comparable pattern of correlations across all three measures, thereby supporting the use of the PID-5-BF as a screening measure of dimensional maladaptive personality traits.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572

American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4

10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

10.1037/pas0000096

10.1177/1073191112471141

10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.007

10.1037/per0000162

10.1080/00223891.2013.825623

Ben-Porath Y. S., 2008, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation

10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Browne M. W., 1993, Alternative ways of assessing model fit: Testing structural equation models

10.1007/BF02310555

10.1037/a0034878

10.1080/00223891.2013.866569

10.1177/1073191113504984

10.1177/1073191115621793

Harkness A. R., 1994, Differentiating normal and abnormal personality, 291

10.1177/1088868310361240

10.1037/a0026656

10.1177/1073191113486286

Hyler S. E., 1994, Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire, PDQ-4+

10.1017/S0033291712002292

10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.170

10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732

10.1037/0021-843X.116.4.645

10.1037/pas0000120

10.1177/1073191113486513

Miller J. D., 2015, Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6, 32

10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182a20ea8

Muthén L. K., 2015, Mplus user’s guide, Version 7.2.

10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01047.x

10.1177/1073191113486183

10.1177/1073191113508808

10.1177/0004867413511997

10.1080/00223891.2013.825625

10.1007/BF02291170

10.1037/a0024703

10.1177/1073191112449857

10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.253

10.1037/a0027669

10.1037/a0037633

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Assessment

Tập 25 Số 5

596-607

Thông tin tác giả