Utility of balloon expulsion test in patients with constipation: Preliminary results in a single center

ADVANCES IN DIGESTIVE MEDICINE - Tập 3 - Trang 181-186 - 2016
Ching-Sheng Hsu1,2,3, Tso-Tsai Liu3,4, Chih-Hsun Yi3,4, Wei-Yi Lei3,4, Jui-Sheng Hung3,4, Chien-Lin Chen3,4
1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan
2School of Post-Baccalaureate Chinese Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
3School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
4Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan

Tóm tắt

SummaryBackgroundPelvic floor dyssynergia can be a cause of idiopathic constipation. Although pelvic floor dyssynergia can be diagnosed by rectal balloon expulsion (BE) and anorectal manometry, the utility of BE in the evaluation of constipation in clinical practice remains to be determined. To this end, we examined the role of BE among different body positions in Taiwanese people with constipation.MethodsFourteen Taiwanese adults (age range, 19–61 years), including six healthy volunteers (4 male, 2 female) and eight patients with chronic constipation (1 male, 7 female) underwent solid‐state anorectal manometry and BE. The demographic data of all individuals were recorded at enrollment.ResultsCompared to healthy volunteers, patients with chronic constipation had a numerically lower threshold for mean resting pressure (p = 0.052), squeeze pressure, maximal squeeze pressure, and lower threshold volumes for urge, but higher threshold pressures for compliance. Successful BE seemed to be associated with lower mean resting pressure (p = 0.061), lower mean threshold volumes for urge, and higher mean maximal squeeze pressure for compliance. Although patients with chronic constipation had a numerically lower successful rate of rectal BE than healthy controls, the differences did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionIn Taiwanese individuals, results of BE seems consistent with anorectal manometry parameters, and patients with chronic constipation have a trend of lower successful rate of rectal BE than healthy controls. However, future work to confirm the use of BE in differentiating subtypes of chronic constipation is needed.

Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.064 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.029 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.044 10.1007/BF02050015 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00326.x Liu T.T., 2008, Anorectal manometry in patients with chronic constipation: a single‐center experience, Hepatogastroenterology, 55, 426 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061 10.5056/jnm14068 10.1046/j.1365-2982.2002.00352.x Bansal N., 2013, Anorectal manometry: current techniques and indications, JIMSA, 26, 169 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41845.x 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2004.00526.x 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.11.001 10.1038/ajg.2012.221 Ratuapli S.K., 2013, Phenotypic identification and classification of functional defecatory disorders using high‐resolution anorectal manometry, Gastroenterology, 144, 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.049 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00827.x