Using the latent class approach to cluster firms in benchmarking: An application to the US electricity transmission industry

Zhou, 2008, A survey of Data Envelopment Analysis in energy and environmental studies, European J. Oper. Res., 189, 1, 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.04.042 Agrell PJ, Farsi M, Filippini M, Koller M. 2013. Unobserved heterogeneous effects in the cost efficiency analysis of electricity distribution systems, CER-ETH Economics working papers series 13/171, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich. Llorca M, Orea L, Pollitt MG. Efficiency and environmental factors in the US electricity transmission industry. Efficiency series papers 02/2013. Oviedo efficiency group. 2013. Haney, 2009, Efficiency analysis of energy networks: an international survey of regulators, Energy Policy, 37, 5814, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.047 Greene, 2005, Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models, J Prod Anal, 23, 7, 10.1007/s11123-004-8545-1 Greene, 2005, Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimator of the stochastic frontier model, J Econometrics, 126, 269, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.003 Beard, 1991, Finite mixture estimation of multiproduct cost functions, vol. 73(4), 654 Gropper, 1999, Estimating multiproduct cost functions over time using a mixture of normals, J Prod Anal, 11, 201, 10.1023/A:1007736003616 Battese, 2004, A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies, J Prod Anal, 21, 91, 10.1023/B:PROD.0000012454.06094.29 O’Donnell, 2008, Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios, vol. 34(2), 231 Verbeek, 2008 Koehler, 1988, A comparison of the Akaike and Schwarz criteria for selecting model order, Appl. Stat., 37, 187, 10.2307/2347338 Costello, 2005, Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis, Pract Asses Res Eval, 10, 1 Johnson, 2011, One-stage estimation of the effects of operational conditions and practices on productive performance: asymptotically normal and efficient, root-n consistent StoNEZD method, J Prod Anal, 36, 219, 10.1007/s11123-011-0231-5 Johnson, 2012, One-stage and two-stage DEA estimation of the effects of contextual variables, European J. Oper. Res., 220, 559, 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.023 Farrell, 1957, The measurement of productive efficiency, J Roy Statist Soc Ser A, 120, 253, 10.2307/2343100 Coelli, 2005 Huettner, 1978, Electric utilities: scale economies and diseconomies, Southern Economic J, 44, 883, 10.2307/1057736 Pollitt, 1995 Dismukes, 1998, Capacity and economies of scale in electric power transmission, Utilities Policy, 7, 155, 10.1016/S0957-1787(98)00010-1 Simar, 2007, Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes, J Econometrics, 136, 31, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009 Po, 2009, A new clustering approach using data envelopment analysis, European J. Oper. Res., 199, 276, 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.10.022 Kruger, 2010, Comment on “A new clustering approach using data envelopment analysis”, European J. Oper. Res., 206, 269, 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.023 Amin, 2011, Some clarifications on the DEA clustering approach, European J. Oper. Res., 215, 498, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.06.043 Moazami Goudarzi, 2012, Clustering Decision Making Units (DMUs) using Full Dimensional Efficient Facets (FDEFs) of PPS with BCC technology, Appl Math Sci, 6, 1431 Bogetoft, 2011 Kuosmanen, 2013, What is the best practice for benchmark regulation of electricity distribution? Comparison of DEA, SFA and StoNED Methods, Energy Policy, 61, 740, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.091 Wang, 2002, One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels, J Prod Anal, 18, 129, 10.1023/A:1016565719882 Kim, 2008, Valid tests of whether technical inefficiency depends on firm characteristics, J Econometrics, 144, 409, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.04.005 Ruggiero, 1998, Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis, European J. Oper. Res., 111, 461, 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00306-8 Muñiz, 2006, Evaluating alternative DEA models used to control for non-discretionary inputs, Comput. Oper. Res., 33, 1173, 10.1016/j.cor.2004.09.007 Agrell PJ, Bogetoft P. Development of benchmarking models for German electricity and gas distribution, Consultation report, Bundesnetzagentur, Bonn, Germany, 2007. Haney, 2013, International benchmarking of electricity transmission by regulators: theory and practice, Energy Policy, 62, 267, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.042 von Geymueller, 2009, Static versus dynamic DEA in electricity regulation: the case of US transmission system operators, CEJOR Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 17, 397, 10.1007/s10100-009-0099-x Jamasb, 2003, International benchmarking and regulation: an application to European electricity distribution utilities, vol. 31(15), 1609 Yu, 2009, Does weather explain cost and quality performance? An analysis of UK electricity distribution companies, Energy Policy, 37, 4177, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.030 Nillesen, 2010, Using regulatory benchmarking techniques to set company performance targets: the case of US electricity, Compet Regul Netw Indus, 11, 50 Jamasb, 2012, Estimating the marginal cost of quality improvements: the case of the UK electricity distribution companies, Energy Econ., 34, 1498, 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.022 Growitsch, 2012, Efficiency effects of observed and unobserved heterogeneity: evidence from Norwegian electricity distribution networks, Energy Econ., 34, 542, 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.013 Fonseca, 2007, Mixture-model cluster analysis using information theoretical criteria, Intelligent Data Analysis, 11, 155, 10.3233/IDA-2007-11204 Aigner, 1977, Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models, J Econometrics, 6, 21, 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5 Simar, 2010, Inferences from cross-sectional, Stochastic Frontier Models, Econometric Rev, 29, 62, 10.1080/07474930903324523