Using the Comparative Agendas Project to examine interest group behavior
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adler, E.Scott, and John D. Wilkerson. 2013. Congress and the politics of problem solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R., et al. 2014. Money, priorities, and stalemate: How lobbying affects public policy. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 13 (1): 194–209.
Baumgartner, Frank R., Suzanna De Boef, and Amber E. Boydstun. 2008. The decline of the death penalty and the discovery of innocence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R., Bryan D. Jones, and John D. Wilkerson. 2002. Studying policy dynamics. In Policy dynamics.Frank, ed. R. Baumgartner, and Bryan D. Jones. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R., Heather A. Larsen-Price, Beth L. Leech, and Paul Rutledge. 2011. Congressional and Presidential Effects on the Demand for Lobbying. Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 3–16.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 1998. Basic interests: The importance of groups in politics and in political science. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Bevan, Shaun. 2013. Continuing the collective action dilemma: The survival of voluntary associations in the United States. Political Research Quarterly 66 (3): 545–558.
Bevan, Shaun. 2019. The creation of the comparative agendas project codebook. In Comparative policy agendas: Theory, tools, data, ed. F.R. Baumgartner, C. Breunig, and E. Grossman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bevan, Shaun, and Anne Rasmussen. 2017. When does government listen to the public? Voluntary associations and dynamic agenda representation in the United States. Policy Studies Journal 00 (00): 1–22.
Crosson, Jesse M., Alexander C. Furnas, and Geoffrey C. Lorenz. 2019. “Estimating Proposal and Status Quo Locations for Legislation Using Cosponsorships, Roll-Call Votes, and Interest Group Bill Positions.” In Massachusets Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusets. https://polmeth.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/Jesse_Crosson.pdf.
Dahl, Robert Alan. 1961. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American City, 2nd ed. London: Yale University Press.
Dunlap, Riley E., and Peter J. Jacques. 2013. Climate change denial books and conservative think tanks: Exploring the connection. American Behavioral Scientist 57 (6): 699–731.
Fagan, E.J. 2019a. Information wars: Think tanks, parties and polarization in congress. Hungary: In Budapest.
Fagan, E. J. 2019b. Issue ownership and the priorities of party elites in the United States, 2004–2016. Party Politics: 1354068819839212.
Fagan, E. J., Zachary A. McGee, and Herschel F. Thomas. 2019. The power of the party: Conflict expansion and the agenda diversity of interest groups. Political Research Quarterly: 1065912919867142.
Gais, Thomas L., Mark A. Peterson, and Jack L. Walker. 1984. Interest groups, iron triangles and representative institutions in American national government. British Journal of Political Science 14 (2): 161–185.
Gilardi, Fabrizio, and Bruno Wüest. 2018. “Text-as-Data Methods for Comparative Policy Analysis.” In Amsterdam, ND, 18. https://www.fabriziogilardi.org/resources/papers/Gilardi-Wueest-TextAsData-Policy-Analysis.pdf.
Hall, Richard L., and Alan V. Deardorff. 2006. Lobbying as legislative subsidy. American Political Science Review 100 (1): 69–84.
Jones, Bryan D., and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2005. The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, Bryan D., Sean M. Theriault, and Michelle Whyman. 2019. The great broadening: How the vast expansion of the policy-making agenda transformed American politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kimball, David C., Frank R. Baumgartner, Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, Beth L. Leech, and Bryce Summary. 2012. Who cares about the lobbying agenda? Interest Groups & Advocacy. 1 (1): 5–25.
Leech, Beth L., Frank R. Baumgartner, Timothy M. La Pira, and Nicholas A. Semanko. 2005. Drawing lobbyists to washington: Government activity and the demand for advocacy. Political Research Quarterly 58 (1): 19–30.
Lewallen, Jonathan, Sean M. Theriault, and Bryan D. Jones. 2016. Congressional dysfunction: An information processing perspective: Congressional dysfunction and hearings. Regulation & Governance 10 (2): 179–190.
Lorenz, Geoffrey Miles. 2019. Prioritized interests: Diverse lobbying coalitions and congressional committee agenda-setting. The Journal of Politics. 82: 225–240.
Martin, Andrew W., Frank R. Baumgartner, and John D. McCarthy. 2005. Measuring association populations using the encyclopedia of associations: Evidence from the field of labor unions. Social Science Research 35 (3): 771–778.
McKay, Amy., Adam Chalmers, Beth Leech, Patrick Bernhagen, and Joost Berkhout. 2018. Congruence between interest groups’ agendas and the public’s agendas in four countries. Presented at the comparative agendas project conference in Amsterdam, Netherlands. July 2018.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Hinsdale, Ill: Dryden Press.
Truman, David. 1951. Governmental process: Political interests and public opinion. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
Walker, Edward T., John D. McCarthy, and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2011. Replacing members with managers? Mutualism among membership and nonmembership advocacy organizations in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 116 (4): 1284–1337.