Using social media data to estimate recreational travel costs: A case study from California

Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 2021. Sustainable recreation and transportation. Retrieved November 4, 2021, from https://eip.laketahoeinfo.org/EIPFocusArea/Detail/3. Sierra Nevada Alliance, 2021. Highlights: Officials promise to protect Lake Tahoe with $415 million. Retrieved November 5, 2021, from https://sierranevadaalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/Sierra-Resource-CO-8_23_2017.html. The Sierra Nevada Ally, 2021. Overtourism takes a toll on Lake Tahoe’s recreational resources. Retrieved November 4, 2021, from https://www.sierranevadaally.org/2021/04/29/overtourism-takes-a-toll-on-lake-tahoes-recreational-resources/. Amoako-Tuffour, 2012, Leisure and the net opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand analysis: an application to Gros Morne National Park, J. Appl. Econ., 15, 25, 10.1016/S1514-0326(12)60002-6 Baerenklau, 2010, A latent class approach to modeling endogenous spatial sorting in zonal recreation demand models, Land Econ., 86, 800, 10.3368/le.86.4.800 Balmford, 2015, Walk on the wild side: estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas, PLoS Biol., 13, e1002074, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002074 Bartczak, 2008, Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: the case of Poland, Forest Policy Econ., 10, 467, 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.04.002 Bawa, 2017, Effects of wildfire on the value of recreation in western North America, J. Sustain. For., 36, 1, 10.1080/10549811.2016.1233503 Bigirwa, 2021, Measuring the economic use values of recreation resources in protected areas, evidence from Nyerere national park in Tanzania, Am. J. Environ. Resour. Econ., 6, 54, 10.11648/j.ajere.20210602.14 Bilmes, 2019 Bowker, 2009, Estimating the net economic value of national forest recreation: an application of the national visitor use monitoring, Database, No Bratman, 2019, Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective, Sci. Adv., 5, 10.1126/sciadv.aax0903 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protections (CALFIRE) Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP), 2015. Vegetation (fveg)–CALFIRE FRAP [ds1327]. Retrieved October 21, 2021, from https://map.dfg.ca.gov/metadata/ds1327.html. California Tahoe Conservancy, 2019. Tahoe Conservancy accepts $1.95 million grant to co-manage 2.4 million-acre Tahoe-Central Sierra Initiative. Retrieved November 9, 2021, from https://tahoe.ca.gov/tahoe-conservancy-accepts-1-95-million-grant-to-co-manage-tahoe-central-sierra-initiative/. California Tahoe Conservancy, 2021. Recreation & Public Access. Retrieved November 9, 2021, from https://tahoe.ca.gov/recreation-public-access/. Ciesielski, 2021, Using Flickr data and selected environmental characteristics to analyse the temporal and spatial distribution of activities in forest areas, Forest Policy Econ., 129, 102509, 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102509 Clemente, 2019, Combining social media photographs and species distribution models to map cultural ecosystem services: The case of a Natural Park in Portugal, Ecol. Ind., 96, 59, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.043 Czajkowski, 2019, The individual travel cost method with consumer-specific values of travel time Savings, Environ. Resour. Econ., 74, 961, 10.1007/s10640-019-00355-6 Daily, 2021, The next steps for valuing nature in decision making, Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev., 63, 17, 10.1080/00139157.2021.1979858 Daily, 2022, 25 years of valuing ecosystems in decision-making, Nature, 606, 465, 10.1038/d41586-022-01480-x Dorwart, 2009, Visitors' perceptions of a trail environment and effects on experiences: a model for nature-based recreation experiences, Leis. Sci., 32, 33, 10.1080/01490400903430863 Duane, 1996, Recreation in the Sierra. In Sierra Nevada ecosystem project, final report to Congress, Vol. 2, 557 Duffield, 2013, Effects of wildfire on national park visitation and the regional economy: A natural experiment in the Northern Rockies, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 22, 1155, 10.1071/WF12170 English, 2018, Estimating the value of lost recreation days from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 91, 26, 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.06.010 English, 2020, A Review of the Forest Service's National Visitor Use Monitoring (NVUM) Program, Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev., 49, 64, 10.1017/age.2019.27 Ezebilo, 2016, Economic value of a non-market ecosystem service: an application of the travel cost method to nature recreation in Sweden, Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag., 12, 314 Fagerholm, 2021, Outdoor recreation and nature’s contribution to well-being in a pandemic situation-Case Turku, Finland, Urban Forest. Urban Green., 64, 127257, 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127257 Gellman, 2022, Wildfire, smoke, and outdoor recreation in the western United States, Forest Policy Econ., 134, 102619, 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102619 Ghermandi, 2018, Integrating social media analysis and revealed preference methods to value the recreation services of ecologically engineered wetlands, Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 351, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.012 Ghermandi, 2019, Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: A systematic map, Glob. Environ. Chang., 55, 36, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.003 Gnedenko, 2021, 545 Hale, 2019, Cultural ecosystem services provided by rivers across diverse social-ecological landscapes: A social media analysis, Ecol. Ind., 107, 105580, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105580 Hausmann, 2018, Social media data can be used to understand tourists’ preferences for nature-based experiences in protected areas, Conserv. Lett., 11, e12343, 10.1111/conl.12343 Hermes, 2018, Assessment and valuation of recreational ecosystem services of landscapes, Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 289, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.011 The White House, 2022. FACT SHEET: President Biden Signs Executive Order to Strengthen America’s Forests, Boost Wildfire Resilience, and Combat Global Deforestation. Retrieved May 1, 2022, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/04/22/fact-sheet-president-biden-signs-executive-order-to-strengthen-americas-forests-boost-wildfire-resilience-and-combat-global-deforestation/. Keeler, 2015, Recreational demand for clean water: evidence from geotagged photographs by visitors to lakes, Front. Ecol. Environ., 13, 76, 10.1890/140124 Kim, 2019, Wildfire, national park visitation, and changes in regional economic activity, J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour., 26, 34, 10.1016/j.jort.2019.03.007 Kubo, 2020, Mobile phone network data reveal nationwide economic value of coastal tourism under climate change, Tour. Manag., 77, 104010, 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104010 Lankia, 2015, Valuing recreational ecosystem service flow in Finland, J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour., 10, 14, 10.1016/j.jort.2015.04.006 Lee, 2019, Mapping cultural ecosystem services 2.0–Potential and shortcomings from unlabeled crowd sourced images, Ecol. Ind., 96, 505, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.035 Leh, 2018, Measuring recreational value using travel cost method (TCM): a number of issues and limitations, Int. J. Acad. Res. Business Social Sci., 8, 1381 Loomis, 2006, A comparison of the effect of multiple destination trips on recreation benefits as estimated by travel cost and contingent valuation methods, J. Leis. Res., 38, 46, 10.1080/00222216.2006.11950068 Loomis, 2012, Did the great recession reduce visitor spending and willingness to pay for nature-based recreation? Evidence from 2006 and 2009, Contemp. Econ. Policy., 30, 238, 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00277.x Mancini, 2018, Using social media to quantify spatial and temporal dynamics of nature-based recreational activities, PLoS One, 13, e0200565, 10.1371/journal.pone.0200565 Manley, 2022, Mapping and modeling the impact of climate change on recreational ecosystem services using machine learning and big data, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 054025, 10.1088/1748-9326/ac65a3 Manley, 2022, A review of machine learning and big data applications in addressing ecosystem service research gaps, Ecosyst. Serv., 57, 101478, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101478 Mäntymaa, 2021, Providing ecological, cultural, and commercial services in an urban park: a travel cost–contingent behavior application in Finland, Landsc. Urban Plan., 209, 104042, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104042 Mayer, 2018, Assessing and valuing the recreational ecosystem services of Germany’s national parks using travel cost models, Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 371, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.009 Montagnini, 2022, Introduction. Biodiversity Islands: strategies for conservation in human-dominated environments, 3 Muñoz, 2020, Using crowdsourced spatial data from Flickr vs. PPGIS for understanding nature's contribution to people in Southern Norway, People Nat., 2, 437, 10.1002/pan3.10083 Oteros-Rozas, 2018, Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites, Ecol. Ind., 94, 74, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.009 Paracchini, 2014, Mapping cultural ecosystem services: a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU, Ecol. Ind., 45, 371, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018 Parsons, 2003, The travel cost model, 269 Parsons, 2021, A site-portfolio model for multiple-destination recreation trips: valuing trips to national parks in the Southwestern United States, J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ., 8, 1 Quesnel Seipp, 2023, A multi-benefit framework for funding forest management in fire-driven ecosystems across the Western US, J. Environ. Manage., 344, 118270, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118270 R Core Team, 2022 Rashidi, 2017, Exploring the capacity of social media data for modelling travel behaviour: Opportunities and challenges, Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol., 75, 197, 10.1016/j.trc.2016.12.008 Remme, 2021, An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 118, 10.1073/pnas.2018472118 Richards, 2015, A rapid indicator of cultural ecosystem service usage at a fine spatial scale: content analysis of social media photographs, Ecol. Ind., 53, 187, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.034 Richards, 2018, Using image recognition to automate assessment of cultural ecosystem services from social media photographs, Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 318, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.004 Rogers, 2019, Valuing non-market economic impacts from natural hazards, Nat. Hazards, 99, 1131, 10.1007/s11069-019-03761-7 Rosenberger, 2018 Rosenberger, 1999, The value of ranch open space to tourists: combining observed and contingent behavior data, Growth Chang., 30, 366, 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1999.tb00035.x Ruiz-Frau, 2020, Using graph theory and social media data to assess cultural ecosystem services in coastal areas: method development and application, Ecosyst. Serv., 45, 101176, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101176 Russell, 2013, Humans and nature: how knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being, Annu. Rev. Env. Resour., 38, 473, 10.1146/annurev-environ-012312-110838 Sánchez, 2021, Valuing the impacts of forest disturbances on ecosystem services: An examination of recreation and climate regulation services in US national forests, Trees Forests People, 5, 100123, 10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100123 Sandifer, 2015, Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation, Ecosyst. Serv., 12, 1, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.007 Sardana, 2016, Valuing setting-based recreation for selected visitors to national forests in the southern United States, J. Environ. Manage., 183, 972, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.050 Shoam, A., 2021. What Ever Happened to Flickr? Retrieved March 2, 2022, from https://www.techspot.com/article/2384-flickr/. Shrestha, 2007, Valuing nature-based recreation in public natural areas of the Apalachicola River region, Florida, J. Environ. Manag., 85, 977, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.014 Sierra Nevada Conservancy, 2021. Tahoe-Central Sierra Initiative. Retrieved November 5, 2021, from https://sierranevada.ca.gov/what-we-do/tcsi/. Sinclair, 2018, A crowdsourced valuation of recreational ecosystem services using social media data: An application to a tropical wetland in India, Sci. Total Environ., 642, 356, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.056 Sinclair, 2020, Valuing nature-based recreation using a crowdsourced travel cost method: A comparison to onsite survey data and value transfer, Ecosyst. Serv., 45, 101165, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101165 Smith, 2018 Smith, 1983, The opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand models, Land Econ., 59, 259, 10.2307/3145728 Sonter, 2016, Spatial and temporal dynamics and value of nature-based recreation, estimated via social media, PLoS One, 11, e0162372, 10.1371/journal.pone.0162372 Teles da Mota, 2020, Using social media to assess nature-based tourism: Current research and future trends, J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour., 30, 100295, 10.1016/j.jort.2020.100295 Toivonen, 2019, Social media data for conservation science: A methodological overview, Biol. Conserv., 233, 298, 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.023 US Census Bureau, 2020. Cartographic Boundary Files – Shapefile. Retrieved March 3, 2022, from https://www.census.gov/geographies/mapping-files/time-series/geo/cartographic-boundary.2020.html. US Census Bureau, 2021. Current versus Constant (or Real) Dollars. Retrieved January 21st, 2021, from https://www.census.gov/topics/income-poverty/income/guidance/current-vs-constant-dollars.html. Ward, 1986, The travel cost demand model as an environmental policy assessment tool: a review of literature, West. J. Agric. Econ., 164 White, 2020, Research note: Quick assessment of recreation use and experience in the immediate aftermath of wildfire in a desert river canyon, J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour., 29, 100251, 10.1016/j.jort.2019.100251 Wolsko, 2019, Nature-based physical recreation leads to psychological well-being: Evidence from five studies, Ecopsychology, 11, 222, 10.1089/eco.2018.0076 Wood, 2013, Using social media to quantify nature-based tourism and recreation, Sci. Rep., 3, 1, 10.1038/srep02976 Wood, 2020, Next-generation visitation models using social media to estimate recreation on public lands, Sci. Rep., 10, 1, 10.1038/s41598-020-70829-x Zhang, 2021, Using social media to measure and map visitation to public lands in Utah, Appl. Geogr., 128, 102389, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102389