Using participatory design to integrate stakeholder voices in the creation of a culturally relevant computing curriculum

2019 2018 Alim, 2017, What is culturally sustaining pedagogy and why does it matter?, 1 Allen-Handy, 2020, Black girls steaming through dance: Inspiring STEAM literacies, STEAM identities, and positive self-concept, 198 Archer, 2014, Spheres of influence: What shapes young people’s aspirations at age 12/13 and what are the implications for education policy?, Journal of Educational Policy, 29, 58, 10.1080/02680939.2013.790079 Babbitt, 2015, Adinkra mathematics: A study of ethnocomputing in ghana, Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 5, 110, 10.17583/remie.2015.1399 Barab, 2001, Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum, Educational Technology Research Developement, 49, 71, 10.1007/BF02504948 Bjerknes, 1995, User participation and democracy: A discussion of scandinavian research on system development, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 7, 73 Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.-A. (2010). Participatory design and democratizing innovation. In Proc. 11th particip. des. conf. - PDC’10, Sydney, Australia, (pp. 41–50). Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjögren, D., & Sundblad, Y. (2000). Cooperative design - Perspectives on 20 years with the Scandinavian IT design model. In Proc. nord. 2000 (pp. 1–9). Brulé, 2019, Negotiating gender and disability identities in participatory design 2019, Computer and information technology occupations, Occupations Outlook Handbook (N.D.) Carroll, 2000, The development of cooperation: Five years of participatory design in the virtual school, 239 Coenraad, 2019, Enacting identities: Participatory design as a context for youth to reflect, project, and apply their emerging identities, 185 Coenraad, 2021, Identifying youths’ spheres of influence through participatory design, Designs for Learning, 13, 20, 10.16993/dfl.163 Cooper, 2000, Classroom conundrums: The use of a participant design methodology, Journal of Educational Technological Society, 3, 85 DiSalvo, 2014, Saving face while geeking out: Video game testing as a justification for learning computer science, Journal of Learning Science, 23, 272, 10.1080/10508406.2014.893434 Dopplick, 2014 Druin, 1999, Cooperative inquiry: Developing new technologies for children with children, 592 Druin, 2002, The role of children in the design of new technology, 1 Eglash, 2007, Ethnocomputing with native American design, 210 Eglash, 2006, Culturally situated design tools: Ethnocomputing from field site to classroom, American Anthropology, 108, 347, 10.1525/aa.2006.108.2.347 Eglash, 2013, Toward culturally responsive computing education, Commun. ACM., 56, 33, 10.1145/2483852.2483864 Eglash, 2013, Culturally responsive computing in urban, after-school contexts: Two approaches, Urban Educations, 48, 629, 10.1177/0042085913499211 Fails, 2012, Methods and techniques for involving children in the design of new technology for children, Foundations on Trends Human–Computer Interactions, 6, 85, 10.1561/1100000018 Franklin, 2020, An analysis of use-modify-create pedagogical approach’s success in balancing structure and student agency, 14 Franklin, 2011, Animal tlatoque: Attracting middle school students to computing through culturally-relevant themes, 453 Franklin, 2020, Scratch encore: The design and pilot of a culturally-relevant intermediate scratch curriculum Gay, 2000 Goode, 2011, Exploring computer science, ACM Transactions on Computational Education, 11, 1, 10.1145/1993069.1993076 Guha, 2013, Cooperative inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design, International Journal of Child-Computer Interactions, 1, 14, 10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.003 Gutiérrez, 2017, Understanding identity sampling and cultural repertoires: Advancing a historicizing and syncretic system of teaching and learning in justice pedagogies, 247 Hansen, 2016, Supporting teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge of fractions through co-designing a virtual manipulative, Journal of Mathematics Teaching Education, 19, 205, 10.1007/s10857-016-9344-0 Holbert, 2016, Leveraging cultural values and ways of knowing to increase diversity in maker activities, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 9–10, 33, 10.1016/j.ijcci.2016.10.002 Hundal, 2014, Lessons of researcher-teacher co-design of an environmental health afterschool club curriculum, International Journal of Science Education, 36, 1510, 10.1080/09500693.2013.844377 Iversen, O. S., Kanstrup, A. M., & Petersen, M. G. (2004). A visit to the New Utopia. In Proc. third nord. conf. human-computer interact. (pp. 171–179). Iversen, 2017, Child as protagonist: Expanding the role of children in participatory design, 27 Kafai, 2019, Stitching the loop with electronic textiles promoting equity in high school students’ competencies and perceptions of computer science, 1176 Kensing, 1998, Participatory design: Issues and concerns, Computers Supporting Cooperational Workers, 7, 167, 10.1023/A:1008689307411 Kyza, 2014, Developing in-service science teachers’ ownership of the PROFILES pedagogical framework through a technology- supported participatory design approach to professional development, Science Educational International, 25, 186 Ladson-Billings, 1995, Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy, American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465, 10.3102/00028312032003465 Ladson-Billings, 2009 Ladson-Billings, 2014, Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a the remix, Harvard Educational Review, 84, 74, 10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751 Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310 Lee, 2011, Computational thinking for youth in practice, ACM Inroads, 2, 32, 10.1145/1929887.1929902 Lee, 2016, None but ourselves can free our minds: Critical computational literacy as a pedagogy of resistance, Equity Excellence Education, 49, 480, 10.1080/10665684.2016.1227157 Lee, 2018, Beyond coding: Using critical computational literacy to transform tech, Texas Educational Review, 6, 10 Lui, 2014, Immersive simulations for smart classrooms: Exploring evolutionary concepts in secondary science, Technology Pedagog Education, 23, 57, 10.1080/1475939X.2013.838452 Magerko, 2016, Earsketch: A STEAM-based approach for underrepresented populations in high school computer science education, ACM Transactions on Computational Education, 16, 14:1, 10.1145/2886418 Maloney, 2010, The scratch programming language and environment, ACM Transactions on Computational Educations, 10, 1, 10.1145/1868358.1868363 Margolis, 2008 Mejias, 2018, The partnership for early engagement in computer science (PEECS) program: Facilitating the diversification of d.c.’s tech workforce, 141 Miaskiewicz, 2011, Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes?, Design Studies, 32, 417, 10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003 Moll, 1992, Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms, Theory Practices, 31, 132, 10.1080/00405849209543534 Muller, 1993, Participatory design, Communations on ACM, 36, 24, 10.1145/153571.255960 Papert, 1980 Paris, 2012, Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice, Educational Research, 41, 93, 10.3102/0013189X12441244 Penuel, 2007, Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process, Research Practice Technology Enhancement Learning, 02, 51, 10.1142/S1793206807000300 Proctor, 2019, Unfold studio: Supporting critical literacies of text and code, Information Learning Sciences, 120, 285, 10.1108/ILS-05-2018-0039 Resnick, 2009, Scratch: Programming for all, Communations on ACM, 52, 60, 10.1145/1592761.1592779 Restuccia, D., Liu, P.-C., & Williams, Z. (2017). In Rebooting jobs: How computer science skills spread in the job market, Boston, MA. Roschelle, 2006, Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics, 606 Saldaña, 2015 Sanders, 2008, Co-creation and the new landscapes of design, CoDesign, 4, 5, 10.1080/15710880701875068 Santo, R., Vogel, S., & Ching, D. (2019). CS for what?: diverse visions of computer science education in practice. New York, NY:. Scott, 2015, Culturally responsive computing: a theory revisited, Learning Media Technology, 40, 412, 10.1080/17439884.2014.924966 Smith, 2016, Computer science for all, White House Blog Tissenbaum, 2021, The case for alternative endpoints in computing education, British Journal of Educational Technology, 1 Vee, 2017 Wang, 2017, Diversity barriers in K–12 computer science education: Structural and social, 615 Zhang, 2010, Deconstructing and reconstructing: Transforming primary science learning via a mobilized curriculum, Computers Education, 55, 1504, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.016