Using data envelope analysis to compare project efficiency in a multi-project environment

Braglia, 1999, Evaluating and selecting investments in industrial robots, Int J Prod Res, 37, 4157, 10.1080/002075499189718 Charnes, 1978, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, Eur J Oper Res, 2, 429, 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 Cook, 2000, Project prioritization: a resource constrained data envelope analysis approach, Socio-Economic Planning Sci, 34, 85, 10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00020-8 Cooper, 2001, Comparison and evaluations of alternative approaches to the treatment of congestion in DEA, Eur J Oper Res, 132, 62, 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00113-2 Dixon, 2000 Friedman, 1997, Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context, Eur J Oper Res, 100, 629, 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)84108-2 Federal Aviation Administration. Federal Aviation Administration Standard Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), Version 3.2. Washington (DC): Federal Aviation Administration; 2003. Heragu, 1997 Jenkins, 2003, A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis, Eur J Oper Res, 147, 51, 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00243-6 Lock, 1987 Maital, 2000, Data envelope analysis with resource constraints: an alternative model with non-discretionary factors, Eur J Oper Res, 128, 206, 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00352-5 Mayor, 2003 Meredith, 2003 Park, 2000, The efficiency of conventional fuel power plants in South Korea: a comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches, Int J Econ, 63, 59 Project Management Institute, 2004 Rozenes, 2004, MPCS: Multidimensional Project Control System, Int J Project Manage, 22, 109, 10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00002-4 Shtub, 2005 Thamassoulis, 2001 US Department of Defense. Performance measurement for selected acquisitions, DOD 7000.2. Washington (DC): US Department of Defense; 1997.