Using an integrated discourse analysis approach to analyze a group's collaborative argumentation

Andriessen, 2006, Arguing to learn, 443 Angermuller, 2015, Discourse studies, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd edition), 6, 510, 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03216-5 Aouine, 2019, A workflow-based solution to support the assessment of collaborative activities in e-learning: A design founded on IMS-LD meta-model, The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36, 124, 10.1108/IJILT-01-2018-0004 Baker, 2009, Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge, 127 Baker, 2019, Collaborative argumentation-based learning, The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education, 76, 10.4324/9780429441677-8 Barzilai, 2020, Dealing with disagreement: The roles of topic familiarity and disagreement explanation in evaluation of conflicting expert claims and sources, Learning and Instruction, 69, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101367 Berland, 2009, Making sense of argumentation and explanation, Science Education, 93, 26, 10.1002/sce.20286 Billig, 1987 Bishop, 2021, Responsiveness and intellectual work: Features of mathematics classroom discourse related to student achievement, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30, 466, 10.1080/10508406.2021.1922413 Brown, 2006, Positioning students as actors and authors: A chronotopic analysis of collaborative learning activities, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13, 247, 10.1207/s15327884mca1303_6 Callanan, 2011, Informal learning. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews, Cognitive Science, 2, 646 Cavagnetto, 2010, Argument to foster scientific literacy: A review of argument interventions in K-12 science contexts, Review of Educational Research, 80, 336, 10.3102/0034654310376953 Chen, 2017, Two tales of time: Uncovering the significance of sequential patterns among contribution types in knowledge-building discourse, Interactive Learning Environments, 25, 162, 10.1080/10494820.2016.1276081 Chinn, 2013, Learning through collaborative argumentation, 314 Chiu, 2014, Statistical Discourse Analysis: A method for modeling online discussion processes, Journal of Learning Analytics, 1, 61, 10.18608/jla.2014.13.5 Coffin, 2009, Argument reconceived?, Educational Review, 61, 301, 10.1080/00131910903045948 Csanadi, 2018, When coding-and-counting is not enough: Using epistemic network analysis (ENA) to analyze verbal data in CSCL research, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13, 419, 10.1007/s11412-018-9292-z Damşa, 2014, The multi-layered nature of small-group learning: Productive interactions in object-oriented collaboration, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 247, 10.1007/s11412-014-9193-8 De Laat, 2004, It's not so easy: Researching the complexity of emergent participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions: Participant roles in asynchronous networked learning discussions, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 165, 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00085.x De Wever, 2007, Applying multilevel modelling to content analysis data: Methodological issues in the study of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups, Learning and Instruction, 17, 436, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.001 Dillenbourg, 2002, Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design, 61 Dobie, 2015, Interaction in teacher communities: Three forms teachers use to express contrasting ideas in video clubs, Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 230, 10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.003 Elorriaga, 2013, Collaborative concept mapping activities in a classroom scenario, Behaviour & Information Technology, 32, 1292, 10.1080/0144929X.2011.632649 Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge. Felton, 2015, Arguing to agree: Mitigating my-side bias through consensus-seeking dialogue, Written Communication, 32, 317, 10.1177/0741088315590788 Fiore, 2010, Toward an understanding of macrocognition in teams: Developing and defining complex collaborative processes and products, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 11, 250, 10.1080/14639221003729128 Gee, 2004 Giri, 2020, Effect of scientific argumentation on the development of critical thinking, Science & Education, 29, 673, 10.1007/s11191-020-00120-y Governor, 2021, Negotiations in scientific argumentation: An interpersonal analysis, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58, 1389, 10.1002/tea.21713 Ho, 2019, Above- and below-average students think differently: Their scientific argumentation patterns, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 34, 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100607 Järvelä, 2013, New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL, Educational Psychologist, 48, 25, 10.1080/00461520.2012.748006 Jeong, 2008, How day of posting affects level of critical discourse in asynchronous discussions and computer-supported collaborative argumentation, British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 875, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00789.x Jeong, 2006, The effects of conversational language on group interaction and group performance in computer-supported collaborative argumentation, Instructional Science, 34, 367, 10.1007/s11251-006-0002-2 Jeong, 2017, A sequential analysis of responses in online debates to postings of students exhibiting high versus low grammar and spelling errors, Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 1175, 10.1007/s11423-016-9501-2 Joiner, 2003, The effects of communication medium on argumentation and the development of critical thinking, International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 861, 10.1016/j.ijer.2004.11.008 Jonassen, 2010, Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines, Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 439, 10.1007/s11423-009-9143-8 Kapon, 2021, Forms of participation in an engineering maker-based inquiry in physics, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58, 249, 10.1002/tea.21654 Kapur, 2011, Temporality matters: Advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 39, 10.1007/s11412-011-9109-9 Karasavvidis, 2000, Investigating how secondary school students learn to solve correlational problems: Quantitative and qualitative discourse approaches to the development of self-regulation, Learning and Instruction, 10, 267, 10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00030-4 Knight, 2017, Time for change: Why learning analytics needs temporal analysis, Journal of Learning Analytics, 4, 7, 10.18608/jla.2017.43.2 Kramarski, 2006, Online discussion and self-regulated learning: Effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy, The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 218, 10.3200/JOER.99.4.218-231 Ku, 2014, Epistemological beliefs and the effect of authority on argument–counterargument integration: An experiment, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 67, 10.1016/j.tsc.2014.03.004 Labrie, 2015, Quantifying doctors' argumentation in general practice consultation through content analysis: Measurement development and preliminary results, Argumentation, 29, 33, 10.1007/s10503-014-9331-5 Latifi, 2020, Worked example or scripting? Fostering students' online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning, Interactive Learning Environments, 1 Lämsä, 2020, The potential of temporal analysis: Combining log data and lag sequential analysis to investigate temporal differences between scaffolded and non-scaffolded group inquiry-based learning processes, Computers and Education, 143, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103674 Lin, 2020, The influence of a web-based learning environment on low achievers' science argumentation, Computers & Education, 151, 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103860 Lobczowski, 2020, An exploration of social regulation of learning during scientific argumentation discourse, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101925 Ouyang, F., Hu, Y., Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., & Yang, Y. (2021). In-service teachers’ knowledge building during face-to-face collaborative learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, 103479,1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103479. Johnson, M.N., & McLean, E. (2020). Discourse analysis. International encyclopedia of human geography (2nd edition): 3 (pp. 377–383). doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10814-5.Elsevier. Marquart, C.L., Hinojosa, C., Swiecki, Z., Eagan, B., & Shaffer, D.W. (2018). Epistemic network analysis [Software] Version 1.6.0. epist emicn etwork.org. Mason, 2004, Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 103, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.001 Mercier, 2017, The influence of achievement goals on collaborative interactions and knowledge convergence, Learning and Instruction, 50, 31, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.006 Noroozi, 2012, Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research, Educational Research Review, 7, 79, 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006 Noroozi, 2013, Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL, Computers & Education, 61, 59, 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.013 Nussbaum, 2005, The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing, Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 157, 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.157 Omarchevska, 2022, It takes two to tango: How scientific reasoning and self-regulation processes impact argumentation quality, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31, 237, 10.1080/10508406.2021.1966633 Ouyang, 2019, The relationship between social participatory role and cognitive engagement level in online discussions, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 1396, 10.1111/bjet.12647 Ouyang, 2022, Using a three-layered social-cognitive network analysis framework to understand online collaborative discussions, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 164 Park, 2015, Does it matter if the teacher is there?: A teacher's contribution to emerging patterns of interactions in online classroom discussions, Computers & Education, 82, 315, 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.019 Pozzi, 2011, The impact of scripted roles on online collaborative learning processes, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 471, 10.1007/s11412-011-9108-x Puntambekar, 2013, Chapter 12 Mixed methods for analyzing collaborative learning, 187 Reimann, 2009, Time is precious: Variable-and event-centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 239, 10.1007/s11412-009-9070-z Rudsberg, 2017, Students' meaning making in classroom discussions: The importance of peer interaction, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12, 709, 10.1007/s11422-015-9721-5 Rudsberg, 2013, Analyzing students' learning in classroom discussions about socioscientific issues, Science Education, 97, 594, 10.1002/sce.21065 Scardamalia, 2006, Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology, 97 Schellens, 2007, Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups?, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 225, 10.1007/s11412-007-9016-2 Schneider, 2021, Collaboration analytics—current state and potential futures, Journal of Learning Analytics, 8, 1, 10.18608/jla.2021.7447 Shaffer, 2016, A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data, Journal of Learning Analytics, 3, 9, 10.18608/jla.2016.33.3 Soysal, 2021, Talking science; argument-based inquiry, teachers' talk moves, and students' critical thinking in the classroom, Science & Education, 30, 33, 10.1007/s11191-020-00163-1 Stegmann, 2012, Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment, Instructional Science, 40, 297, 10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5 Strijbos, 2010, Emerging and scripted roles in computer-supported collaborative learning, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 491, 10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.006 Su, 2021, Is the text-based cognitive tool more effective than the concept map on improving the pre-service teachers' argumentation skills?, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100862 Tang, 2016, A study of non-native discourse in an online community of practice (CoP) for teacher education, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 8, 48, 10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.002 Tsovaltzi, 2017, Leveraging social networking sites for knowledge co-construction: Positive effects of argumentation structure, but premature knowledge consolidation after individual preparation, Learning and Instruction, 52, 161, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.06.004 van Amelsvoort, 2007, Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 485, 10.1080/10508400701524785 van Eemeren, 1987, Teaching argumentation analysis and critical thinking in the Netherlands, Informal Logic, 9, 57, 10.22329/il.v9i2.2662 Vygotsky, 1978 Walker, 2013, Learning to argue and arguing to learn: Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate chemistry students learn how to construct arguments and engage in argumentation during a laboratory course, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 561, 10.1002/tea.21082 Weinberger, 2006, A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning, Computers and Education, 46, 71, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003 Winne, 2015, What is the state of the art in self-, co-and socially shared regulation in CSCL?, Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 628, 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.007 Winter, 2018, Analysis of knowledge construction during group space activities in a flipped learning course, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34, 720, 10.1111/jcal.12279 Wise, 2011, Analyzing temporal patterns of knowledge construction in a role-based online discussion, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 445, 10.1007/s11412-011-9120-1 Wise, 2021, Collaborative learning analytics, 425 Wu, 2011, High school students' informal reasoning regarding a socio-scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures, International Journal of Science Education, 33, 371, 10.1080/09500690903505661 Zuloaga, 2021, The role of immersion and non-immersion contexts in L2 acquisition: A study based on the analysis of interactional discourse markers, Corpus Pragmatics, 5, 121, 10.1007/s41701-020-00093-x