Using Signals for appropriate feedback: Perceptions and practices

Computers & Education - Tập 57 - Trang 2414-2422 - 2011
Zeynep Tanes1, Kimberly E. Arnold2, Abigail Selzer King1, Mary Ann Remnet2
1Purdue University, Department of Communication, Beering Hall of Liberal Arts and Education, Room 2114, 100 North University Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2098, United States
2Purdue University, Academic Technologies, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams, 2007 Baralt, 2011, Comparing learners’ state anxiety during task-based interaction in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication, Language Teaching Research, 15, 201, 10.1177/0265532210388717 Biesinger, 2010, The effects of feedback protocol on self-regulated learning in a web-based worked example learning environment, Computers & Education, 55, 1470, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.013 Bracken, 2004, Criticism or praise? The impact of verbal versus text-only computer feedback on social presence, intrinsic motivation, and recall, Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 7, 349, 10.1089/1094931041291358 Bryant, 2002 Chen, 2001, Trends in augmented feedback research and tips for the practitioner. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 72, 32, 10.1080/07303084.2001.10605817 Chen, 2009, Mobile formative assessment tool based on data mining techniques for supporting web-based learning, Computers & Education, 52, 256, 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.005 Costa, 2010, A web-based formative assessment tool for Masters students: a pilot study, Computers & Education, 54, 1248, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.011 Csikszentmihalyi, 2000 Denton, 2008, Students responses to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: a comparative case study, British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 486, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00745.x Desuvire, 2004, Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games, Paper presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems. van Dijk, 1999, Not having what you want versus having what you do not want: the impact of type of negative outcome on the experience of disappointment and related emotions, Cognition and Emotion, 13, 129, 10.1080/026999399379302 2006 Fredenburg, 2001, The effects of augmented feedback on students’ perception and performance, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 232, 10.1080/02701367.2001.10608956 Garris, 2002, Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model, Simulation Gaming, 33, 441, 10.1177/1046878102238607 Gordijn, 2002, Effects of complex feedback on computer-assisted modular instruction, Computers & Education, 39, 183, 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00025-8 Groen, 2007, Physiological correlates of learning by performance feedback in children: a study of EEG event-related potentials and evoked heart rate, Biological Psychology, 76, 174, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.07.006 Higgins, 2002, The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning, Studies in Higher Education, 27, 53, 10.1080/03075070120099368 Li, 2007, Examining the relationships between students’ implicit theories of ability, goal orientations and the preferred type of augmented feedback, Journal of Sport Behavior, 30, 280 Loewen, 2006, Corrective feedback in the chatroom: an experimental study, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19, 1, 10.1080/09588220600803311 London, 1999, Relationships between feedback and self-development, Group and Organizational Management, 24, 5, 10.1177/1059601199241002 Merrill, 2002, First principles of instruction, Educational Technology Research & Development, 50, 43, 10.1007/BF02505024 McCune, 2005, The development of students’ ways of thinking and practicing in three final-year biology courses, Higher Education, 49, 255, 10.1007/s10734-004-6666-0 Noels, 1999, Perceptions of teachers’ communicative style and students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, The Modern Language Journal, 83, 23, 10.1111/0026-7902.00003 Owen, 2007, A content analysis of the treatment of informative and reinforcing feedback in Contemporary communication Theory Textbooks, American Communication Journal, 9 Patton, 2002 Rieber, 1996, Animation as feedback in a computer-based simulation: representation matters, Educational Technology Research & Development, 44, 5, 10.1007/BF02300323 Smith, 2005 Spink, 1997, Information science: A third feedback framework, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 728, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199708)48:8<728::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-U Stewart, 1993 Terzis, 2011, The acceptance and use of computer based assessment, Computers & Education, 56, 1032, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017 Thelwall, 2000, Computer-based assessment: a versatile educational tool, Computers & Education, 34, 37, 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00037-8 Tunstall, 1996, Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: a typology, British Educational Research Journal, 22, 389, 10.1080/0141192960220402 Van Eck, 2006, Digital game-based learning: It's not just the digital natives who are restless, Educause(March/April), 16 Walther, 2002, Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: computer-mediated communication and relationships Watts, 2007, Evaluative feedback: perspectives on media effects, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 384, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00330.x Wierinck, 2005, Effect of augmented visual feedback from a virtual reality simulation system on manual dexterity training, European Journal of Dental Education, 9, 10, 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2004.00351.x Yun, 2008, Improving recall and transfer skills through vocabulary building in web-based second language learning: an examination by item and feedback type, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11, 158