Using ChatGPT-3 as a writing tool: an educational assistant or a moral hazard? Current ChatGPT-3 media representations compared to Plato’s critical stance on writing in Phaedrus

Alouani, N.: Why you’re the biggest loser in the AI wars. Geek Culture. https://medium.com/geekculture/why-youre-the-biggest-loser-in-the-ai-wars-62824a5f1786 (2023). Accessed 16 June 2023

Alkaissi, H., McFarlane, S.I.: Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: implications in scientific writing. Cureus 15(2). https://www.cureus.com/articles/138667-artificial-hallucinations-in-chatgpt-implications-in-scientific-writing (2023). Accessed 16 June 2023

Bender, E.M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., Shmitchell, S.: On the dangers of stochastic parrots. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 610–623, ACM (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Bent, M., Stubbings R.: The SCONUL seven pillars of information literacy: core model for higher education. SCONUL. https://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf (2011). Accessed 16 June 2023

Brauner, P., Hick, A., Philipsen, R., Ziefle, M.: What does the public think about artificial intelligence?—a criticality map to understand bias in the public perception of AI. Front. Comput. Sci. 5(111), 3903 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1113903

Brey, P.: Theories of technology as extension of the human body. In: Mitcham, C. (ed.) Research in Philosophy and Technology, vol. 19, pp. 59–78. JAI Press, Greenwich (2000)

Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P.A., Shipway, J.R.: Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 61, 11–12 (2023)

Döbeli Honegger, B.: Warum soll ich lernen, was die Maschine (besser) kann? http://blog.doebe.li/Blog/. Accessed 12 Mar 2023

Editorials, N.: Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature 10, 612–613 (2023). https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00191-1

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S.K., Noroozi, O., Wals, A.: A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: implications for educational practice and research. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Firat, M.: What ChatGPT means for universities: perceptions of scholars and students. J. Appl. Learn. Teach. 6(1), 57–63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22

Fütterer, T., Fischer, C., Alekseeva, A., Chen, X., Tate, T., Warschauer, M., Gerjets, P.: ChatGPT in education: global reactions to AI innovations. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 15310 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42227-6

Heitsch, E.: Platon. Phaedrus, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen (1997)

Grunwald, A.: Technology assessment for responsible innovation. In: Responsible innovation 1: innovative solutions for global issues, pp. 15–31. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)

Hubig, C.: Mittel. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld (2002)

Jernite, Y., Nguyen, H., Biderman, S., Rogers, A., Masoud, M., Danchev, V., Mitchell, M.: Data governance in the age of large-scale data-driven language technology. In: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 2206–2222 (2022)

Jonas, H.: Technology and responsibility: reflections on the new task of ethics. Soc. Res. 40, 31–54 (1973)

Khalil, M., Er, E.: Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of plagiarism detection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04335 (2023). Accessed 16 June 2023

Kikerpill, K., Siibak, A.: App-hazard disruption: an empirical investigation of media discourses on ChatGPT in educational contexts. Comput. Sch. 40(4), 334–355 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2023.2244941

King, M.R.: ChatGPT: a conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 16(1), 1–2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8

Knapp, M., Brower, S.: The ACRL framework for information literacy in higher education: implications for health sciences librarianship. Med. Ref. Serv. Q 33(4), 460–468 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2014.957098

Kooli, C.: Chatbots in education and research: a critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability 15(7), 5614 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075614

Lametti, D.: ChatGPT won’t kill the college essay. https://slate.com/technology/2022/12/chatgpt-college-essay-plagiarism.html (2022). Accessed 16 June 2023

Lawson, C.L.I.V.E.: Technology and the extension of human capabilities. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 21, 8308 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00428.x

Lear, J.: Radical Hope: Ethics in the Face of Cultural Devastation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2006)

Li, L., Ma, Z., Fan, L., Lee, S., Yu, H., Hemphill, L.: ChatGPT in education: A discourse analysis of worries and concerns on social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02201 (2023). Accessed 16 June 2023

Loos, E., Gröpler, J., Goudeau, M.L.S.: Using ChatGPT in Education: Human Reflection on ChatGPT’s Self-Reflection. Societies 13(8), 196 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13080196

Loos, E., Ivan, L., Sourbati, M.: Asking ChatGPT How to Fight Visual Ageism on Websites: Pitfall or Opportunity? In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 33–247). Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham (accepted)

Lupton, D.: ‘Not the real me’: social imaginaries of personal data profiling. Cult. Sociol. 15(1), 3–21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/174997552093977

Mackey, T.P., Jacobson, T.E.: Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy. Coll. Res. Libr. 72(1), 62–78 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-76r1

McLuhan, M.: Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill, New York (1964)

Mahmood, K.: Do people overestimate their information literacy skills? A systematic review of empirical evidence on the Dunning-Kruger effect. Commun. Inf. Lit. 10(2), 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.24

Marche, S.: The College Essay Is Dead. The Atlantic, 6 Dec (2022)

Ong, W.: Orality and Literacy. Routledge, Milton Park (2002)

Ord, T.: The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. Bloombury, London (2020)

Polonsky, M.J., Rotman, J.D.: Should artificial intelligent agents be your co-author? Arguments in favour informed by ChatGPT. Australas. Mark. J. 31(2), 91–96 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582231167882

Platonis Opera, vol. II I. Burnet (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford Classical Texts, Oxford (1901)

Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Heathcote, L.: The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. J. Appl. Learn. Teach. 6(1) (2023). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., Tan, S.: ChatGPT: bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? J. Appl. Learn. Teach. (2023). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Sheffield, F.C.C.: Plato’s Symposium: The Ethics of Desire. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

Szlezák, T.A.: Platon: Meisterdenker der Antike. CH Beck, München (2021)

Sier, K.: Die Rede der Diotima. Untersuchungen zum platonischen Symposium. Stuttgart/Leipzig (1997)

Stokel-Walker, C.: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature 613(7945), 620–621 (2023)

Tajik, E., Tajik, F.: A comprehensive examination of the potential application of Chat GPT in higher education institutions. https://www.techrxiv.org/articles/preprint/A_comprehensive_Examination_of_the_potential_application_of_Chat_GPT_in_Higher_Education_Institutions/22589497/1 (2023). Accessed 16 June 2023

Tate, T.P., Doroudi, S., Ritchie, D., Xu, Y., Warschauer, M.: Educational research and AI-generated writing: confronting the coming Tsunami [Preprint]. EdArXiv. (2023). https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/4mec3

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M.A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D.T., Huang, R., Agyemang, B.: What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learn. Environ. 10(1), 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Trust, T., Whalen, J., Mouza, C.: Editorial: ChatGPT: challenges, opportunities, and implications for teacher education. Contemp. Issues Technol. Teacher Educ. 23(1), 1–23 (2013)

Vagle, J.L.: Cybersecurity and moral hazard. Stanf. Technol. Law Rev. 23, 71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3055231

Van Es, K., Schäfer, M.T., Wieringa, M.: Tool criticism and the computational turn. A “methodological moment” in media and communication studies. Medien. Kommun. 69(1), 46–64 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2021-1-46