User anonymity versus identification in computer-supported collaborative learning: Comparing learners' preferences and behaviors

van Aalst, 2009, Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 259, 10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5 Abedin, 2011, Enhancing non-task sociability of asynchronous CSCL environments, Computers & Education, 57, 2535, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.002 Aggarwal, 2008, Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 255, 10.1177/0273475308322283 Ainsworth, 2011, Anonymity in classroom voting and debating, Learning and Instruction, 21, 365, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.001 Armstrong, 2020, The accuracy of interrater reliability estimates found using a subset of the total data sample: A bootstrap analysis, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society - Annual Meeting, 64, 1377, 10.1177/1071181320641329 Bagustari, 2019, Anonymity supporting tool for community of inquiry-based platform in encouraging people to share knowledge: A case study of pusilkom universitas Indonesia, 4th International Conference on Information Technology (InCIT), 12 Barron, 2003, When smart groups fail, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307, 10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1 van den Bos, 2019, Effects of anonymity on online peer review in second-language writing, Computers & Education, 142, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103638 Chester, 1998, Online teaching: Encouraging collaboration through anonymity, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4, JCMC424 Christopherson, 2007, The positive and negative implications of anonymity in internet social interactions: “On the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.”, Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 3038, 10.1016/j.chb.2006.09.001 Daft, 1984 Davis, 2007, Impact of anonymity of input in next-generation classroom networks, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning - CSCL’07 Dubrovsky, 1991, The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups, Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119, 10.1207/s15327051hci0602_2 Flanagin, 2002, Computer-mediated group work: The interaction of sex and anonymity, Communication Research, 29, 66, 10.1177/0093650202029001004 Hadwin, 2017, Self-regulation, Co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments, 83 Hara, 2018, Multi-level de-anonymisation for initially anonymous discussion systems in a self-regulated learning environment, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 302–307, 10.5220/0006760403020307 Hernández-Sellés, 2019, Computer-supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools, Computers & Education, 138, 1, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.012 Hoadley, 2000, Teaching science through online, peer discussions: SpeakEasy in the knowledge integration environment, International Journal of Science Education, 22, 839, 10.1080/095006900412301 Hod, 2018, Co-development patterns of knowledge, experience, and self in humanistic knowledge building communities, Instructional Science, 46, 593, 10.1007/s11251-018-9459-z Howard, 2010, Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers' comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43, 89, 10.2190/EC.43.1.f Järvelä, 2013, New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL, Educational Psychologist, 48, 25, 10.1080/00461520.2012.748006 Järvenoja, 2017, Supporting groups' emotion and motivation regulation during collaborative learning, Learning and Instruction, 101090 Kobayashi, 2020, Does anonymity matter? Examining quality of online peer assessment and students' attitudes, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 10.14742/ajet.4694 Kreijns, 2018, Extending the SIPS-model: A research framework for online collaborative learning, 11082, 277 Kreijns, 2003, Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research, Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335, 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2 Kreijns, 2013, Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework, Educational Psychologist, 48, 229, 10.1080/00461520.2012.750225 Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310 Latané, 1979, Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822 Lea, 2001, Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 526, 10.1177/0146167201275002 Lea, 2007, Visibility and anonymity effects on attraction and group cohesiveness: Visibility and anonymity effects, European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 761, 10.1002/ejsp.398 Lee, 2004, Effects of visual representation on social influence in computer-mediated communication, Human Communication Research, 30, 234 Le, 2018, Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration, Cambridge Journal of Education, 48, 103, 10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389 Lin, 2018, Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system, Computers & Education, 116, 81, 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010 Martin, 2015, Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math?, Journal of School Psychology, 53, 359, 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.07.001 Miyazoe, 2011, Anonymity in blended learning: Who would you like to be?, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14, 175 Muñoz-Carril, 2021, Factors influencing students' perceived impact of learning and satisfaction in computer supported collaborative learning, Computers & Education, 174, 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104310 Näykki, 2014, Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning—a process-oriented case study in a higher education context, International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 1, 10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001 Northrup, 2001, A framework for designing interactivity into web-based instruction, Educational Technology, 41, 31 O'Sullivan, 2003, Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages, New Media & Society, 5, 69, 10.1177/1461444803005001908 Panadero, 2019, An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44, 1253, 10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186 Panadero, 2023, A systematic review on peer assessment: Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–23 Postmes, 2002, Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality?, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1073, 10.1177/01461672022811006 Roberts, 2013, “I'd be so much more comfortable posting anonymously”: Identified versus anonymous participation in student discussion boards, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 10.14742/ajet.452 Rotsaert, 2018, Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: Its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students' perceptions about peer assessment skills, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, 75, 10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8 Sassenberg, 2002, Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: Effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence, British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 463, 10.1348/014466602760344313 Spears, 2017, Social identity model of deindividuation effects, 1 Spears, 2015, Group identity, social influence, and collective action online: Extensions and applications of the SIDE model, 23 Stahl, 2014, 20 Strauß, 2021, Problematic interaction patterns during online-collaboration. A library and a survey Vanderhoven, 2015, What if pupils can assess their peers anonymously? A quasi-experimental study, Computers & Education, 81, 123, 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.001 Vogler, 2019, LOLsquared: When laughing-out-loud and learning-on-line intermingle in a computer-mediated classroom discussion, Computers & Education, 140, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103597 Wodzicki, 2011, Does the type of anonymity matter? The impact of visualization on information sharing in online groups, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 157, 10.1089/cyber.2009.0383 Woodrich, 2017, Google Docs as a tool for collaborative writing in the middle school classroom, Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 391, 10.28945/3870